Paper · 2023 · Agricultural Water Management

Pod quality, yields responses and water productivity of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) as affected by plant growth regulators and deficit irrigation

G.C. Wakchaure; P.S. Minhas; Satish Kumar; et al.

17
claims
31
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Water scarcity severely impacts agricultural productivity and quality in arid and semi–arid regions. Specific elicitors like plant growth regulators (PGRs) and bio–stimulants as well as deficit irrigation (DI) practices have been put forward to alleviate the effect of resultant water stress and enhance crop productivity. Hence, a field experiment was conducted for two years (2020–2022) to elucidate the effects of PGRs and bio–stimulants of organic and chemical origins under variable deficit irrigation levels on okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.), a major crop grown in the semi–arid region of peninsular India. Treatments included combinations of the foliar sprays with PGRs i.e. irradiated chitosan (IC, 5 ml L–1), sea weed extracts (SWE, 5 ml L–1), thio–urea (TU, 600 ppm), salicylic acid (SA, 20 µM), bacterial biopolymer (BP, 5 ml L–1) along with control (no PGR) and DI levels i.e. equalling 100 %, 75 %, 50 % and 25 % of the crop evapotranspiration (ETc). Irrigation levels were maintained using line source sprinkler (LSS) system. Reductions in pod yield (PY) and above ground biomass (AGB) ranged between 12 and 83 and 20–79 % with DI of 0.75–0.25 ETc. Exogenous foliar application of PGRs improved plant growth, physiological traits and thereby increased PY by 6.1–19.2 %. Beneficial role of PGRs for mitigating water stress was associated with cooler canopy temperatures, maintenance of higher leaf relative water content by modulating stomatal conductance, enhanced plant vigour and photosynthetically active surface. The lower values of yield response factors viz., KSWE ≤ 1 with SWE further indicated increased tolerance of okra to water stress. The maximum crop water productivity (CWP) was 3.43–3.79 kg m–3 with PGRs as compared with 3.32 kg m–3 without PGR. Especially PGRs of organic origin (SWE and IC) were more effective under medium to severe water stress conditions. The response to BP, bio-stimulant of bacterial origin was almost at par with SA. DI reduced physical quality attributes such as mean pod weight and pod length but firmness and seed/peel ratio got improved; the maximum being with 75 % ETc. Improved rehydration quality and higher accumulation of total soluble solids, dry matter, protein, total phenolics, and flavonoids that potentially affect enzymatic activity were monitored with PGRs. It is concluded that the exogenous foliar application of PGRs from organic origins such as SWE and IC in combination with low to moderate DI (50–75 % ETc) is optimal for improving production and post–harvest quality of okra grown in water–scarce areas of peninsular India.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced okra pod yield by 12–83%.

Treatment
DI of 0.75–0.25 ETce0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
Reductionse0
Value
12 and 83e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions in pod yield (PY) and above ground biomass (AGB) ranged between 12 and 83 and 20–79 % with DI of 0.75–0.25 ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced okra aboveground biomass by 20–79%.

Treatment
DI of 0.75–0.25 ETce0
Outcome
above ground biomasse0
Direction
Reductionse0
Value
20–79 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions in pod yield (PY) and above ground biomass (AGB) ranged between 12 and 83 and 20–79 % with DI of 0.75–0.25 ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar growth regulators increased okra pod yield by 6.1–19.2%.

Treatment
Exogenous foliar application of PGRse0
Outcome
PYe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.1–19.2 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exogenous foliar application of PGRs improved plant growth, physiological traits and thereby increased PY by 6.1–19.2 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar growth regulators improved okra growth and physiological traits.

Treatment
Exogenous foliar application of PGRse0
Outcome
plant growth, physiological traitse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exogenous foliar application of PGRs improved plant growth, physiological traits and thereby increased PY by 6.1–19.2 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators were associated with cooler canopies and higher leaf relative water content in water-stressed okra.

Treatment
PGRse0
Outcome
canopy temperatures, maintenance of higher leaf relative water contente0
Direction
coolere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beneficial role of PGRs for mitigating water stress was associated with cooler canopy temperatures, maintenance of higher leaf relative water content by modulating stomatal conductance, enhanced plant vigour and photosynthetically active surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1531 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seaweed extract had a yield response factor no greater than one, indicating greater water-stress tolerance in okra.

Treatment
SWEe0
Outcome
yield response factorse0
Value
KSWE ≤ 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower values of yield response factors viz., KSWE ≤ 1 with SWE further indicated increased tolerance of okra to water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators produced maximum okra crop water productivity of 3.43–3.79 kg m–3 compared with 3.32 kg m–3 without them.

Treatment
PGRse0
Outcome
crop water productivitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.43–3.79 kg m–3e0
Qualifier
3.32 kg m–3e0
Comparator
without PGRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum crop water productivity (CWP) was 3.43–3.79 kg m–3 with PGRs as compared with 3.32 kg m–3 without PGR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1776 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seaweed extract was more effective under medium to severe water stress.

Treatment
SWEe0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Qualifier
medium to severe water stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Especially PGRs of organic origin (SWE and IC) were more effective under medium to severe water stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–1891 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated chitosan was more effective under medium to severe water stress.

Treatment
ICe0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Qualifier
medium to severe water stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Especially PGRs of organic origin (SWE and IC) were more effective under medium to severe water stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–1891 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial biopolymer response was nearly equal to salicylic acid response in okra.

Treatment
BPe0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
almost at pare0
Comparator
SAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response to BP, bio-stimulant of bacterial origin was almost at par with SA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1893–1972 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced okra pod weight and pod length.

Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
mean pod weight and pod lengthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DI reduced physical quality attributes such as mean pod weight and pod length but firmness and seed/peel ratio got improved; the maximum being with 75 % ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1974–2130 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation improved okra pod firmness and seed-to-peel ratio, maximally at 75% ETc.

Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
firmness and seed/peel ratioe0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
75 % ETce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DI reduced physical quality attributes such as mean pod weight and pod length but firmness and seed/peel ratio got improved; the maximum being with 75 % ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1974–2130 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators improved okra rehydration quality.

Treatment
PGRse0
Outcome
rehydration qualitye0
Direction
Improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improved rehydration quality and higher accumulation of total soluble solids, dry matter, protein, total phenolics, and flavonoids that potentially affect enzymatic activity were monitored with PGRs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2132–2330 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators increased okra soluble solids, dry matter and protein.

Treatment
PGRse0
Outcome
total soluble solids, dry matter, proteine0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improved rehydration quality and higher accumulation of total soluble solids, dry matter, protein, total phenolics, and flavonoids that potentially affect enzymatic activity were monitored with PGRs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2132–2330 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators increased okra total phenolics and flavonoids.

Treatment
PGRse0
Outcome
total phenolics, and flavonoidse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improved rehydration quality and higher accumulation of total soluble solids, dry matter, protein, total phenolics, and flavonoids that potentially affect enzymatic activity were monitored with PGRs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2132–2330 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend seaweed extract with 50–75% ETc irrigation to improve okra production and postharvest quality.

Treatment
SWEe0
Outcome
improving production and post–harvest qualitye0
Setting
peninsular Indiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is concluded that the exogenous foliar application of PGRs from organic origins such as SWE and IC in combination with low to moderate DI (50–75 % ETc) is optimal for improving production and post–harvest quality of okra grown in water–scarce areas of peninsular India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2332–2603 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend irradiated chitosan with 50–75% ETc irrigation to improve okra production and postharvest quality.

Treatment
ICe0
Outcome
improving production and post–harvest qualitye0
Setting
peninsular Indiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is concluded that the exogenous foliar application of PGRs from organic origins such as SWE and IC in combination with low to moderate DI (50–75 % ETc) is optimal for improving production and post–harvest quality of okra grown in water–scarce areas of peninsular India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2332–2603 · show in text ↑

class · quality: protein · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

class · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

class · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

irrigation · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 20 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

irrigation · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 48 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

application · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 75 positive, 2 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

application · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 112 positive, 3 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.