Paper · 2017 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Soil residual water and nutrients explain about 30% of the rotational effect in 4-year pulse-intensified rotation systems

Yining Niu; Luke Bainard; Manjula Sarath Bandara; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Diverse crop rotations enable the best use of residual soil water and nutrients, thus decreasing necessary production inputs. Here, we determined the effect of cropping sequences on soil residual water and nutrients and the performance of subsequent wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Nine rotation systems were evaluated at Swift Current, SK, and Brooks, AB, from 2010 to 2014. Pea (P, Pisum sativum L.) and lentil (L, Lens culinaris Medik.) as preceding crops before wheat (W) or the rotation systems with pea (P–P–P–W) or lentil (L–L–L–W) included more than once in the 4-yr rotations had the highest residual soil water and N in the 30–90 cm depth and continuous wheat (W–W–W–W) had the lowest. Preceding pea and lentil increased the grain yield of the subsequent wheat by 26% and 18%, respectively, as compared with continuous wheat. Variance partitioning of redundancy analysis revealed that soil residual water and residual N explained 12.4%–42.7% (average 30%) of the yield variation observed in the subsequent wheat, with the rest of the rotational benefits unexplainable by soil residual water and residual nutrients. Investigation of the factors other than soil water and nutrients that contribute to the succeeding wheat yield may further enhance the rotational effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated pea rotation had among the highest residual soil water and nitrogen.

Treatment
pea (P–P–P–W)e0
Outcome
residual soil water and Ne0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rotation systems with pea (P–P–P–W) or lentil (L–L–L–W) included more than once in the 4-yr rotations had the highest residual soil water and N in the 30–90 cm depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“subsequent wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–278 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated lentil rotation had among the highest residual soil water and nitrogen.

Treatment
lentil (L–L–L–W)e0
Outcome
residual soil water and Ne0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rotation systems with pea (P–P–P–W) or lentil (L–L–L–W) included more than once in the 4-yr rotations had the highest residual soil water and N in the 30–90 cm depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“subsequent wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–278 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous wheat had the lowest residual soil water and nitrogen.

Treatment
continuous wheat (W–W–W–W)e0
Outcome
loweste0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous wheat (W–W–W–W) had the lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea preceding wheat raised subsequent grain yield by 26% relative to continuous wheat.

Treatment
Preceding peae0
Outcome
grain yield of the subsequent wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26%e0
Comparator
continuous wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preceding pea and lentil increased the grain yield of the subsequent wheat by 26% and 18%, respectively, as compared with continuous wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil preceding wheat raised subsequent grain yield by 18% relative to continuous wheat.

Treatment
lentile0
Outcome
grain yield of the subsequent wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18%e0
Comparator
continuous wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preceding pea and lentil increased the grain yield of the subsequent wheat by 26% and 18%, respectively, as compared with continuous wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–832 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soil water and nitrogen explained 12.4%–42.7% of wheat yield variation, averaging 30%.

Compound
residual Ne0
Outcome
yield variation observed in the subsequent wheate0
Value
12.4%–42.7%e0
Qualifier
average 30%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil residual water and residual N explained 12.4%–42.7% (average 30%) of the yield variation observed in the subsequent wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1019 · show in text ↑

Lens culinaris · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.