Abstract
In our trial eight different varieties of sweet and sour cherry rootstocks were examined in three different spacing, what was carried out in Experimental and Research Farm of Corvinus University of Budapest. The aim was to find rootstocks with drought tolerance in different vigorous for the ‘Kantorjanosi 3’, which a wide-spread sour cherry variety at Hungary. The rootstocks were tested (P. mahaleb: ‘CEMA’ and ‘Korponay’ seedlings, ‘SL 64’, ‘Bogdany’ and ‘Magyar’; P. fruticosa: ‘Prob’; Prunus hybrids: ‘Colt’ and ‘Pi-Ku 2’ vegetative propagated) in variant spacing (4x2,5; 4x2; 4x1,5 m). Trees were formed to slender spindle, what is suitable for modern fruit growing. Our results show that this type of crown can be applied at medium and strong vigorous rootstocks in different spacing. In extensive condition, large spacing (4x2-2.5 m) with strong vigorous rootstocks (Prunus mahaleb varieties) are recommended. ‘Magyar’ is also suitable under these conditions, and the spacing can be reduced to 4x1.75 m. The vigour of ‘Prob’ is not enough to the applied spacing. Under these conditions, it is difficult to keep the slender spindle form. Trees on these rootstocks with Zahn-spindle form in higher density could be efficient with modern irrigation, fertilization and training system. The ‘Prob’ rootstock resulted one of the best fruit size. Based on our results we do not recommend for ‘Kantorjanosi 3’ ‘Colt’ and ‘Pi-Ku 2’. The branches died and leaves turned yellow on ‘Pi-Ku 2’. ‘CEMA’ and ‘Korponay’ with strong vigorous gave better yield. Medium vigorous ‘Magyar’ was also suitable in higher tree density. Compared the data we can see that using larger spacing increases the yield significantly. On the other hand the specific yield index does not show significantly difference at the different spacing. Summarizing our results we can state that increasing the density in the orchard, the yield does not decrease significantly. We can reduce spacing as long as the vigorous of rootstocks-scion combination can allow it.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Slender spindle crowns were applicable on medium and strong rootstocks across spacings.
- Taxon
- SOUR CHERRY
Prunus cerasust0 - Outcome
- this type of crown can be appliede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOUR CHERRY”
e0“this type of crown can be applied at medium and strong vigorous rootstocks in different spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend large spacing with vigorous Prunus mahaleb rootstocks under extensive conditions.
- Taxon
- SOUR CHERRYPrunus cerasust0
- Outcome
- large spacing (4x2-2.5 m) with strong vigorous rootstocks (Prunus mahaleb varieties) are recommendede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOUR CHERRY”
e0“In extensive condition, large spacing (4x2-2.5 m) with strong vigorous rootstocks (Prunus mahaleb varieties) are recommended”
Claim · model-written summary
Magyar was suitable under extensive conditions at reduced spacing.
- Taxon
- SOUR CHERRYPrunus cerasust0
- Material
- ‘Magyar’e0
- Outcome
- suitable under these conditionse0
- Value
- 4x1.75 me0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOUR CHERRY”
e0“‘Magyar’ is also suitable under these conditions, and the spacing can be reduced to 4x1.75 m”
Claim · model-written summary
Prob lacked sufficient vigour for the applied spacing and slender spindle training.
- Taxon
- SOUR CHERRYPrunus cerasust0
- Material
- ‘Prob’e0
- Outcome
- vigour of ‘Prob’ is not enoughe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOUR CHERRY”
e0“The vigour of ‘Prob’ is not enough to the applied spacing. Under these conditions, it is difficult to keep the slender spindle form”
Claim · model-written summary
Prob produced one of the best fruit sizes.
- Taxon
- SOUR CHERRYPrunus cerasust0
- Material
- ‘Prob’e0
- Outcome
- fruit sizee0
- Direction
- beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOUR CHERRY”
e0“The ‘Prob’ rootstock resulted one of the best fruit size”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors do not recommend Colt for Kantorjanosi 3.
- Taxon
- SOUR CHERRYPrunus cerasust0
- Material
- ‘Colt’e0
- Outcome
- do not recommende0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOUR CHERRY”
e0“we do not recommend for ‘Kantorjanosi 3’ ‘Colt’ and ‘Pi-Ku 2’”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors do not recommend Pi-Ku 2 for Kantorjanosi 3.
- Taxon
- SOUR CHERRYPrunus cerasust0
- Material
- ‘Pi-Ku 2’e0
- Outcome
- do not recommende0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOUR CHERRY”
e0“we do not recommend for ‘Kantorjanosi 3’ ‘Colt’ and ‘Pi-Ku 2’”
Claim · model-written summary
Branches died and leaves yellowed on Pi-Ku 2.
- Taxon
- SOUR CHERRYPrunus cerasust0
- Material
- ‘Pi-Ku 2’e0
- Outcome
- branches died and leaves turned yellowe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOUR CHERRY”
e0“The branches died and leaves turned yellow on ‘Pi-Ku 2’”
Claim · model-written summary
CEMA gave better yield.
- Taxon
- SOUR CHERRYPrunus cerasust0
- Material
- ‘CEMA’e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- bettere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOUR CHERRY”
e0“‘CEMA’ and ‘Korponay’ with strong vigorous gave better yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Korponay gave better yield.
- Taxon
- SOUR CHERRYPrunus cerasust0
- Material
- ‘Korponay’e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- bettere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOUR CHERRY”
e0“‘CEMA’ and ‘Korponay’ with strong vigorous gave better yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Magyar was suitable at higher tree density.
- Taxon
- SOUR CHERRYPrunus cerasust0
- Material
- ‘Magyar’e0
- Outcome
- suitable in higher tree densitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOUR CHERRY”
e0“Medium vigorous ‘Magyar’ was also suitable in higher tree density”
Claim · model-written summary
Larger spacing significantly increased yield.
- Taxon
- SOUR CHERRYPrunus cerasust0
- Treatment
- larger spacinge0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOUR CHERRY”
e0“using larger spacing increases the yield significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Specific yield index did not differ significantly across spacings.
- Taxon
- SOUR CHERRYPrunus cerasust0
- Treatment
- different spacinge0
- Outcome
- specific yield indexe0
- Direction
- does not show significantly differencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOUR CHERRY”
e0“specific yield index does not show significantly difference at the different spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing orchard density did not significantly decrease yield.
- Taxon
- SOUR CHERRYPrunus cerasust0
- Treatment
- increasing the densitye0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- does not decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOUR CHERRY”
e0“increasing the density in the orchard, the yield does not decrease significantly”