Abstract
A study was undertaken at ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Research Centre, Ranchi during 2006 with the objective to differentiate the litchi genotypes statistically, based on content of different biochemical constituents. Leaf samples collected from 25 genotypes of 25 year old litchi trees at 2 stages from fruit set to maturity were analyzed for content of Total free amino acid, total soluble protein, total phenol and total carbohydrate. At both the stages of observation, significant differences among the genotypes could be recorded for all the four parameters. During both the stage of observation, the content of total free amino acids was found to be the maximum in genotype Purbi whereas the genotype CHL-3 contained the maximum leaf carbohydrate content at both the stages of observation. Cluster analysis presented at as dendrograms based on Euclidean Distance coefficients resulted in grouping the entire genotypes in to 5 primary clusters. Although the phenotypically similar genotypes were present in the first cluster, a number of phenotypically distinct genotypes were also found under the same cluster. The genotypes Shahi and China which are distinct from each other in terms of morphological as well as phenological characters, were found to have close affinity. However, the cultivar Swarna Roopa which is phenotypically distinct from other genotypes was found as single member in a different cluster. Hence, classification of genotypes through D2-analysis based on leaf biochemical characters like total free amino acid, total phenol, total soluble protein and total carbohydrate was found to be insufficient, although the method holds promise by inclusion of more number of biochemical parameters.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Litchi genotypes differed significantly in four leaf biochemical parameters at both stages.
- Outcome
- all the four parameterse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“At both the stages of observation, significant differences among the genotypes could be recorded for all the four parameters.”
t0“litchi genotypes”
Claim · model-written summary
Purbi had the maximum total free amino acid content at both stages.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the content of total free amino acids was found to be the maximum in genotype Purbi”
t0“litchi genotypes”
Claim · model-written summary
CHL-3 had the maximum leaf carbohydrate content at both stages.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the genotype CHL-3 contained the maximum leaf carbohydrate content at both the stages of observation”
t0“litchi genotypes”
Claim · model-written summary
Euclidean-distance clustering grouped the genotypes into five primary clusters.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cluster analysis presented at as dendrograms based on Euclidean Distance coefficients resulted in grouping the entire genotypes in to 5 primary clusters.”
t0“litchi genotypes”
Claim · model-written summary
The first cluster contained phenotypically similar and distinct genotypes.
- Outcome
- phenotypically distinct genotypes were also found under the same clustere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Although the phenotypically similar genotypes were present in the first cluster, a number of phenotypically distinct genotypes were also found under the same cluster.”
t0“litchi genotypes”
Claim · model-written summary
Shahi and China showed close affinity despite morphological and phenological differences.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The genotypes Shahi and China which are distinct from each other in terms of morphological as well as phenological characters, were found to have close affinity.”
t0“litchi genotypes”
Claim · model-written summary
Swarna Roopa formed a single-member cluster.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the cultivar Swarna Roopa which is phenotypically distinct from other genotypes was found as single member in a different cluster.”
t0“litchi genotypes”
Claim · model-written summary
Classification from the four leaf biochemical traits was insufficient.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“classification of genotypes through D2-analysis based on leaf biochemical characters like total free amino acid, total phenol, total soluble protein and total carbohydrate was found to be insufficient”
t0“litchi genotypes”