Paper · 2016 · Tropical Agriculture

Comparative evaluation of animal manures on soil properties growth and yield of sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220

D. F. Uwah; U. L. Undie; Nkereuwem Michael John

14
claims
24
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Alternative sources of plant nutrients have now become imperative especially for vegetable crop production in Nigeria because of the escalating costs of inorganic fertilizers with the attendant environmental and health problems associated with excessive use of these inputs on continuously cropped fields. A two-year field experiment was conducted during the early planting seasons from March to June of 2011 and 2012 on the acidic coastal plain soils at Calabar, to evaluate the combined effects of four rates each (0, 5, 10 and 15 t/ha) of poultry manure (PM) and goat manure (GM) on soil chemical properties and agronomic performance of sweet maize (Zea mays L. saccharata Strut.). Factorial combinations of the treatments were fitted into a randomized complete block design with three replications. The application of the manures significantly (P <= 0.05) raised the soil pH, organic matter content, total N, available P and exchangeable K, Ca and Mg status of the soil. Except for pH, total N, and available P contents, GM had superior responses for all other chemical properties than PM. The 15 t/ha rate of both manures maximized sweet maize growth attributes, total dry matter (TDM) and grain yields and also hastened days to 50% tasselling. On average, the application of 5, 10 and 15 t/ha PM rates, increased TDM by 8.5, 35.1 and 53.9%, whereas the corresponding values for GM were 15.6, 27.8 and 33.2% respectively compared with the unamended control plots. The grain yield increases at 15 t/ha PM and GM were 11.2, 59.8 and 126.9% ; and 4.2, 20.0 and 45.8% respectively, above the 10, 5 and 0 t/ha rates of both manures. The growth and yield attributes showed greater responses to PM than GM in terms of the values obtained. The co-application of PM at 15 t/ha and GM at 10 t/ha had the best effects on TDM and grain yield and is thus recommended for sweet maize production in this agro-ecology.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure application raised soil pH, organic matter and total N.

Taxon
sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220t0
Treatment
manurese0
Outcome
soil pH, organic matter content, total Ne0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the manures significantly (P <= 0.05) raised the soil pH, organic matter content, total N, available P and exchangeable K, Ca and Mg status of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure application raised available P and exchangeable K and Ca.

Taxon
sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220t0
Treatment
manurese0
Outcome
available P and exchangeable K, Cae0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the manures significantly (P <= 0.05) raised the soil pH, organic matter content, total N, available P and exchangeable K, Ca and Mg status of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure application raised exchangeable Mg.

Taxon
sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220t0
Treatment
manurese0
Outcome
Mg status of the soile0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the manures significantly (P <= 0.05) raised the soil pH, organic matter content, total N, available P and exchangeable K, Ca and Mg status of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat manure gave superior responses to poultry manure for soil chemical properties except pH, total N and available P.

Taxon
sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220t0
Treatment
GMe0
Outcome
all other chemical propertiese0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
Except for pH, total N, and available P contentse0
Comparator
PMe0

Verbatim

e0

“Except for pH, total N, and available P contents, GM had superior responses for all other chemical properties than PM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 15 t/ha, both manures maximized growth attributes and total dry matter.

Taxon
sweet maizee0
Treatment
15 t/ha rate of both manurese0
Outcome
growth attributes, total dry matter (TDM)e0
Direction
maximizede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The 15 t/ha rate of both manures maximized sweet maize growth attributes, total dry matter (TDM) and grain yields and also hastened days to 50% tasselling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 15 t/ha, both manures maximized grain yields.

Taxon
sweet maizee0
Treatment
15 t/ha rate of both manurese0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
maximizede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The 15 t/ha rate of both manures maximized sweet maize growth attributes, total dry matter (TDM) and grain yields and also hastened days to 50% tasselling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 15 t/ha, both manures hastened 50% tasselling.

Taxon
sweet maizee0
Treatment
15 t/ha rate of both manurese0
Outcome
days to 50% tassellinge0
Direction
hastenede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The 15 t/ha rate of both manures maximized sweet maize growth attributes, total dry matter (TDM) and grain yields and also hastened days to 50% tasselling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure increased total dry matter by 8.5, 35.1 and 53.9% at 5, 10 and 15 t/ha, respectively.

Taxon
sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220t0
Treatment
5, 10 and 15 t/ha PM ratese0
Outcome
TDMe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.5, 35.1 and 53.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 5, 10 and 15 t/ha PM rates, increased TDM by 8.5, 35.1 and 53.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat manure increased total dry matter by 15.6, 27.8 and 33.2% at corresponding rates.

Taxon
sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220t0
Treatment
GMe0
Value
15.6, 27.8 and 33.2%e0
Comparator
unamended control plotse0

Not reportedOutcomeDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the corresponding values for GM were 15.6, 27.8 and 33.2% respectively compared with the unamended control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 15 t/ha, poultry manure grain yield exceeded 10, 5 and 0 t/ha by 11.2, 59.8 and 126.9%, respectively.

Taxon
sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220t0
Treatment
15 t/ha PMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
11.2, 59.8 and 126.9%e0
Comparator
10, 5 and 0 t/ha ratese0

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield increases at 15 t/ha PM and GM were 11.2, 59.8 and 126.9% ; and 4.2, 20.0 and 45.8% respectively, above the 10, 5 and 0 t/ha rates of both manures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1631 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 15 t/ha, goat manure grain yield exceeded 10, 5 and 0 t/ha by 4.2, 20.0 and 45.8%, respectively.

Taxon
sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220t0
Treatment
GMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
4.2, 20.0 and 45.8%e0
Comparator
10, 5 and 0 t/ha ratese0

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield increases at 15 t/ha PM and GM were 11.2, 59.8 and 126.9% ; and 4.2, 20.0 and 45.8% respectively, above the 10, 5 and 0 t/ha rates of both manures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1631 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and yield attributes responded more to poultry than goat manure.

Taxon
sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220t0
Treatment
PMe0
Outcome
growth and yield attributese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
GMe0

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and yield attributes showed greater responses to PM than GM in terms of the values obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1735 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 15 t/ha poultry manure and 10 t/ha goat manure had the best total dry matter and grain yield effects.

Taxon
sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220t0
Treatment
co-application of PM at 15 t/ha and GM at 10 t/hae0
Outcome
TDM and grain yielde0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The co-application of PM at 15 t/ha and GM at 10 t/ha had the best effects on TDM and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1834 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet maizeZea mays L saccharata Strut 220”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend that manure combination for sweet maize production in this agro-ecology.

Taxon
sweet maizee0
Outcome
co-application of PM at 15 t/ha and GM at 10 t/hae0
Qualifier
this agro-ecologye0

Verbatim

e0

“The co-application of PM at 15 t/ha and GM at 10 t/ha had the best effects on TDM and grain yield and is thus recommended for sweet maize production in this agro-ecology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1906 · show in text ↑

fertilization · phenology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 45 positive, 4 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.