Paper · 2017 · 3 Biotech

Plant regeneration from cell suspension culture in Saccharum officinarum L. and ascertaining of genetic fidelity through RAPD and ISSR markers

Avinash S. Thorat; Nishant A. Sonone; Vrushali V. Choudhari; et al.

16
claims
31
verbatim quotes
44
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of this study was to produce sugarcane plantlets from cell suspension culture and study its genetic fidelity using molecular markers. The study was carried out using sugarcane varieties Co 86032 and Q117. Callus cultures of both the varieties were optimized using six different callus induction media. After screening the growth response of callus on six different callus induction media, it was observed that medium no. VI supplemented with 500 mg l−1 of each PVP, Casein hydrolysate and MES buffer showed high amounts of callus in Co 86032 (79.66 ± 0.44%) and Q117 (82.83 ± 1.69%). Addition of PEG 8000 at 2.5% to this medium had a profound impact on inducing somatic embryogenesis in Co 86032 (54.66 ± 1.76%) and Q117 (66.66 ± 2.60%) as compare to control (24.33 ± 1.76%) and (27.33 ± 2.73%), respectively. Cell suspension cultures were established by culturing embryogenic calli in liquid medium showed well established suspension cultures with fever cell aggregates. There was negligible cell division during initial 2 days of incubation and cell count increased rapidly between 2 and 8 days. Further incubation beyond 8 days resulted in a decrease in cell viability. Enhanced callus proliferation in Q117 while enhanced shoot regeneration in Co 86032 was observed from cell suspension culture. The clonal fidelity of in vitro regenerated plants was assessed by using RAPD and ISSR markers. Analysis of the ten RAPD markers indicated that 90.48 and 86.95% true-to-type regenerated plantlets in Co 86032 and Q117, respectively. However, in the ISSR markers, Co 86032 did not show any polymorphism and in the Q117, 92.18% true-to-type plantlets were found. These results confirmed that somaclonal variation occurs during the process of indirect organogenesis and RAPD and ISSR marker based molecular analysis is a suitable method for an early detection of variation in sugarcane.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium VI yielded high callus formation in Co 86032 at 79.66 ± 0.44%.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Material
Co 86032e0
Treatment
medium no. VI supplemented with 500 mg l−1 of each PVP, Casein hydrolysate and MES buffere0
Outcome
calluse0
Direction
highe0
Value
79.66 ± 0.44%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“medium no. VI supplemented with 500 mg l−1 of each PVP, Casein hydrolysate and MES buffer showed high amounts of callus in Co 86032 (79.66 ± 0.44%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saccharum officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium VI yielded high callus formation in Q117 at 82.83 ± 1.69%.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Material
Q117e0
Treatment
medium no. VI supplemented with 500 mg l−1 of each PVP, Casein hydrolysate and MES buffere0
Outcome
calluse0
Direction
highe0
Value
82.83 ± 1.69%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“medium no. VI supplemented with 500 mg l−1 of each PVP, Casein hydrolysate and MES buffer showed high amounts of callus in Co 86032 (79.66 ± 0.44%) and Q117 (82.83 ± 1.69%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saccharum officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 2.5% PEG 8000 increased somatic embryogenesis in Co 86032 to 54.66 ± 1.76% versus 24.33 ± 1.76% in control.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Material
Co 86032e0
Treatment
Addition of PEG 8000 at 2.5%e0
Outcome
somatic embryogenesise0
Value
54.66 ± 1.76%e0
Qualifier
24.33 ± 1.76%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of PEG 8000 at 2.5% to this medium had a profound impact on inducing somatic embryogenesis in Co 86032 (54.66 ± 1.76%) and Q117 (66.66 ± 2.60%) as compare to control (24.33 ± 1.76%) and (27.33 ± 2.73%), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saccharum officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 2.5% PEG 8000 increased somatic embryogenesis in Q117 to 66.66 ± 2.60% versus 27.33 ± 2.73% in control.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Material
Q117e0
Treatment
Addition of PEG 8000 at 2.5%e0
Outcome
somatic embryogenesise0
Value
66.66 ± 2.60%e0
Qualifier
27.33 ± 2.73%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of PEG 8000 at 2.5% to this medium had a profound impact on inducing somatic embryogenesis in Co 86032 (54.66 ± 1.76%) and Q117 (66.66 ± 2.60%) as compare to control (24.33 ± 1.76%) and (27.33 ± 2.73%), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saccharum officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid culture of embryogenic calli established suspension cultures with fewer cell aggregates.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
culturing embryogenic calli in liquid mediume0
Outcome
well established suspension cultures with fever cell aggregatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cell suspension cultures were established by culturing embryogenic calli in liquid medium showed well established suspension cultures with fever cell aggregates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saccharum officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cell division was negligible during the initial two days of incubation.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Outcome
cell divisione0
Direction
negligiblee0
Qualifier
initial 2 days of incubatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was negligible cell division during initial 2 days of incubation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saccharum officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cell count rose rapidly between days 2 and 8.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Outcome
cell counte0
Direction
increased rapidlye0
Qualifier
between 2 and 8 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cell count increased rapidly between 2 and 8 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saccharum officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incubation beyond eight days reduced cell viability.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Outcome
cell viabilitye0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
beyond 8 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further incubation beyond 8 days resulted in a decrease in cell viability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saccharum officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Q117 showed enhanced callus proliferation from suspension culture.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Material
Q117e0
Treatment
cell suspension culturee0
Outcome
callus proliferatione0
Direction
Enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhanced callus proliferation in Q117 while enhanced shoot regeneration in Co 86032 was observed from cell suspension culture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saccharum officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co 86032 showed enhanced shoot regeneration from suspension culture.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Material
Co 86032e0
Treatment
cell suspension culturee0
Outcome
shoot regeneratione0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhanced callus proliferation in Q117 while enhanced shoot regeneration in Co 86032 was observed from cell suspension culture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saccharum officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD markers identified 90.48% true-to-type regenerated Co 86032 plantlets.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Material
Co 86032e0
Outcome
true-to-type regenerated plantletse0
Value
90.48e0
Qualifier
ten RAPD markerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of the ten RAPD markers indicated that 90.48 and 86.95% true-to-type regenerated plantlets in Co 86032 and Q117, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saccharum officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD markers identified 86.95% true-to-type regenerated Q117 plantlets.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Material
Q117e0
Outcome
true-to-type regenerated plantletse0
Value
86.95%e0
Qualifier
ten RAPD markerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of the ten RAPD markers indicated that 90.48 and 86.95% true-to-type regenerated plantlets in Co 86032 and Q117, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saccharum officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ISSR markers found no polymorphism in regenerated Co 86032 plants.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Material
Co 86032e0
Outcome
did not show any polymorphisme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the ISSR markers, Co 86032 did not show any polymorphism and in the Q117, 92.18% true-to-type plantlets were found.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saccharum officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ISSR markers found 92.18% true-to-type Q117 plantlets.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Material
Q117e0
Outcome
true-to-type plantletse0
Value
92.18%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the ISSR markers, Co 86032 did not show any polymorphism and in the Q117, 92.18% true-to-type plantlets were found.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saccharum officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Somaclonal variation occurred during indirect organogenesis.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Outcome
somaclonal variatione0
Qualifier
during the process of indirect organogenesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“somaclonal variation occurs during the process of indirect organogenesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Saccharum officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD and ISSR molecular analysis was suitable for early detection of variation in sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
early detection of variatione0
Value
suitable methode0

Verbatim

e0

“RAPD and ISSR marker based molecular analysis is a suitable method for an early detection of variation in sugarcane.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1890 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 7 positive, 37 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.