Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Soil Acidity Management and an Economics Response of Lime and Sulfur on Sesame in an Alley Cropping System

Sandeep Kumar; Ram Swaroop Meena; Achyutanand Pandey; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
36
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to evaluate the economic aspects of sesame cultivation in acidic soil and its management with the application of sulfur and lime during the summer (Kharif) seasons of 2014. The experiment was laid out in factorial randomize block design with four levels of sulfur (0, 15, 30 and 45 kg ha‑1) and four doses of lime (CaCO3) (0, 100, 250 and 350 kg ha‑1). The results indicated that at P=0.05 significantly higher seed (285.75 and 286.08 kg ha‑1) and stalk (359.84 and 358.28 kg ha‑1) yield of sesame was noted with the sulfur and lime level of 30 and 250 kg ha‑1, respectively. The considerably more net return (Rs.18660.89) and B: C ratio (3.65) of sesame was recorded under sesame + guava alley system with application of 30 kg S ha-1 over the sole cropping of sesame. Similarly, on lime levels, the higher net returns (Rs.19642.72) and B: C ratio (3.81) of sesame was observed under sesame + guava alley system with application of 250 kg lime ha-1. Although, under alley system the seed yield, stalk yield, net return, and B: C ratio of the sulfur and lime levels of 30 and 250 kg ha‑1were at par with 45 kg S and 350 kg lime ha-1, respectively. Sesame + guava alley system had a more monetary advantage over sole cropping of sesame.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur at 30 kg ha‑1 produced significantly higher sesame seed yield of 285.75 kg ha‑1.

Treatment
sulfur and lime level of 30 and 250 kg ha‑1e0
Outcome
seede0
Direction
highere0
Value
285.75e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher seed (285.75 and 286.08 kg ha‑1) and stalk (359.84 and 358.28 kg ha‑1) yield of sesame was noted with the sulfur and lime level of 30 and 250 kg ha‑1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime at 250 kg ha‑1 produced significantly higher sesame seed yield of 286.08 kg ha‑1.

Treatment
sulfur and lime level of 30 and 250 kg ha‑1e0
Outcome
seede0
Direction
highere0
Value
286.08 kg ha‑1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher seed (285.75 and 286.08 kg ha‑1) and stalk (359.84 and 358.28 kg ha‑1) yield of sesame was noted with the sulfur and lime level of 30 and 250 kg ha‑1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur at 30 kg ha‑1 produced higher stalk yield of 359.84 kg ha‑1.

Treatment
sulfur and lime level of 30 and 250 kg ha‑1e0
Outcome
stalke0
Direction
highere0
Value
359.84e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher seed (285.75 and 286.08 kg ha‑1) and stalk (359.84 and 358.28 kg ha‑1) yield of sesame was noted with the sulfur and lime level of 30 and 250 kg ha‑1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime at 250 kg ha‑1 produced higher stalk yield of 358.28 kg ha‑1.

Treatment
sulfur and lime level of 30 and 250 kg ha‑1e0
Outcome
stalke0
Direction
highere0
Value
358.28 kg ha‑1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher seed (285.75 and 286.08 kg ha‑1) and stalk (359.84 and 358.28 kg ha‑1) yield of sesame was noted with the sulfur and lime level of 30 and 250 kg ha‑1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame plus guava with sulfur returned Rs.18660.89 net over sole sesame.

Treatment
sesame + guava alley system with application of 30 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
moree0
Value
Rs.18660.89e0
Comparator
sole cropping of sesamee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more net return (Rs.18660.89) and B: C ratio (3.65) of sesame was recorded under sesame + guava alley system with application of 30 kg S ha-1 over the sole cropping of sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame plus guava with sulfur had a benefit-cost ratio of 3.65 over sole sesame.

Treatment
sesame + guava alley system with application of 30 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
moree0
Value
3.65e0
Comparator
sole cropping of sesamee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more net return (Rs.18660.89) and B: C ratio (3.65) of sesame was recorded under sesame + guava alley system with application of 30 kg S ha-1 over the sole cropping of sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame plus guava with lime returned Rs.19642.72 net.

Treatment
sesame + guava alley system with application of 250 kg lime ha-1e0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs.19642.72e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher net returns (Rs.19642.72) and B: C ratio (3.81) of sesame was observed under sesame + guava alley system with application of 250 kg lime ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame plus guava with lime had a benefit-cost ratio of 3.81.

Treatment
sesame + guava alley system with application of 250 kg lime ha-1e0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.81e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher net returns (Rs.19642.72) and B: C ratio (3.81) of sesame was observed under sesame + guava alley system with application of 250 kg lime ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30 kg sulfur, sesame yield and economic outcomes were at par with 45 kg sulfur.

Treatment
sulfur and lime levels of 30 and 250 kg ha‑1e0
Outcome
seed yield, stalk yield, net return, and B: C ratioe0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
45 kg S and 350 kg lime ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield, stalk yield, net return, and B: C ratio of the sulfur and lime levels of 30 and 250 kg ha‑1were at par with 45 kg S and 350 kg lime ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame plus guava alley cropping had a monetary advantage over sole sesame.

Treatment
Sesame + guava alley systeme0
Outcome
monetary advantagee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
sole cropping of sesamee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sesame + guava alley system had a more monetary advantage over sole cropping of sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results differ

51 papers: 49 positive, 2 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Psidium guajava · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lime · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.