Paper · 2008 · Legume Research - An International Journal

YIELD OF SESAME (SESAMUM INDICUM) AND GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA) AS INFLUENCED BY DIFFERENT INTERCROPPING RATIOS AND SULPHUR LEVELS

Mahesh Mahale; V.B. Nevase; P.G. Chavan

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the performance of sesame (Sesamum indicum) + groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) intercropping system under different levels of sulphur on the yield of component crops. The experiment was laid out in split plot design during Kharif season of 2005–06. The results indicated that the treatment sesame + groundnut in 3:1 ratio recorded significantly higher yield, that was at par with sesame + groundnut in 1:2 ratio and sesame + groundnut in 1:3 ratio, whereas, the application of sulphur did not influence the yield attributes of both the crops however, application of 30 kg S/ha registered higher grain yields of sesame, which was at par with 60 kg S/ha and significantly superior over the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3:1 sesame-groundnut ratio had significantly higher yield, comparable to 1:2 and 1:3 ratios.

Treatment
sesame + groundnut in 3:1 ratioe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sesame + groundnut in 1:2 ratio and sesame + groundnut in 1:3 ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment sesame + groundnut in 3:1 ratio recorded significantly higher yield, that was at par with sesame + groundnut in 1:2 ratio and sesame + groundnut in 1:3 ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–485 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur did not influence yield attributes of either crop.

Treatment
application of sulphure0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of sulphur did not influence the yield attributes of both the crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–579 · show in text ↑
e1

“sesame (Sesamum indicum) + groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty kg S/ha gave higher sesame grain yield, similar to 60 kg S/ha and above control.

Treatment
30 kg S/hae0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 30 kg S/ha registered higher grain yields of sesame, which was at par with 60 kg S/ha and significantly superior over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–733 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results differ

51 papers: 49 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.