Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Productivity potential and economic feasibility of sesame (Sesamum indicum) based intercropping system with different planting patterns on rainfed upland

R.K. SARKAR; G.C. MALlK; S. GOSWAMI r

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Afield experiment was conducted during the rainy season of 2000 and 2001 to determine productivity and eco nomic feasibility of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) based intercropping system on Gangetic alluvial rainfed up land. All the intercropping systems registered significant and appreciable increase in total productivity in terms of sesame equivalent yield over sole sesame. Among different intercropping patterns of sesame with pulse and oil seed crops, paired row planted sesame (30160 cm) 1 row groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) resulted in maximum sesame equivalent yield (1,654 kglha), net return (Rs 9,414 kglha), land equivalent ratio (1.59), monetary advan tage (Rs 6,751 kg/ha), and indicated a modest aggressivity index (k0.29) owing to minimum competition between crops. This system, thus, proved most efficient and sustainable on rainfed upland ecosystem.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All intercropping systems significantly increased sesame-equivalent yield over sole sesame.

Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Outcome
sesame equivalent yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
sole sesamee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the intercropping systems registered significant and appreciable increase in total productivity in terms of sesame equivalent yield over sole sesame.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired-row sesame with groundnut had maximum sesame-equivalent yield of 1,654 kglha.

Treatment
paired row planted sesame (30160 cm) 1 row groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)e0
Outcome
sesame equivalent yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1,654 kglhae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“paired row planted sesame (30160 cm) 1 row groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) resulted in maximum sesame equivalent yield (1,654 kglha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The paired-row sesame–groundnut pattern had net return of Rs 9,414 kglha.

Treatment
groundnute1
Outcome
net returne0
Value
Rs 9,414 kglhae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net return (Rs 9,414 kglha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame (Sesamum indicum) based intercropping system with different planting patterns on rainfed upland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“paired row planted sesame (30160 cm) 1 row groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The paired-row sesame–groundnut pattern had land-equivalent ratio of 1.59.

Treatment
groundnute1
Outcome
land equivalent ratioe0
Value
1.59e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“land equivalent ratio (1.59)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame (Sesamum indicum) based intercropping system with different planting patterns on rainfed upland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“paired row planted sesame (30160 cm) 1 row groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The paired-row sesame–groundnut pattern had monetary advantage of Rs 6,751 kg/ha.

Treatment
groundnute1
Outcome
monetary advan tagee0
Value
Rs 6,751 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“monetary advan tage (Rs 6,751 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame (Sesamum indicum) based intercropping system with different planting patterns on rainfed upland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“paired row planted sesame (30160 cm) 1 row groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–529 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The paired-row system had a modest aggressivity index, attributed to minimum crop competition.

Outcome
modest aggressivity indexe0
Value
k0.29e0
Qualifier
minimum competition between cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indicated a modest aggressivity index (k0.29) owing to minimum competition between crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame (Sesamum indicum) based intercropping system with different planting patterns on rainfed upland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–153 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The paired-row sesame–groundnut system was judged most efficient and sustainable on rainfed upland.

Outcome
most efficient and sustainable on rainfed upland ecosysteme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This system, thus, proved most efficient and sustainable on rainfed upland ecosystem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame (Sesamum indicum) based intercropping system with different planting patterns on rainfed upland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–153 · show in text ↑

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.