Paper · 2017 · Comparative Cytogenetics

Karyotype characterization and comparison of three hexaploid species of Bromus Linnaeus, 1753 (Poaceae)

Leonardo Luís Artico; Ana Cristina Mazzocato; Juliano Lino Ferreira; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Chromosome morphometry and nuclear DNA content are useful data for cytotaxonomy and to understand the evolutionary history of different taxa. For the genus Bromus Linnaeus, 1753, distinct ploidy levels have been reported, occurring from diploid to duodecaploid species. The geographic distribution of Bromus species has been correlated with chromosome number and ploidy level. In this study, the aims were to determine the nuclear genome size and characterize the karyotype of the South American Bromus species: Bromus auleticus Trinius ex Nees, 1829, Bromus brachyanthera Döll, 1878 and Bromus catharticus Vahl, 1791. The mean nuclear 2C value ranged from 2C = 12.64 pg for B. catharticus to 2C = 17.92 pg for B. auleticus, meaning a maximum variation of 2C = 5.28 pg, equivalent to 41.70%. Despite this significant difference in 2C value, the three species exhibit the same chromosome number, 2n = 6x = 42, which confirms their hexaploid origin. Corroborating the genome size, the chromosome morphometry (total, short- and long-arm length) and, consequently, the class differed among the karyotypes of the species. Based on the first karyograms for these Bromus species, some morphologically similar and several distinct chromosome pairs were found. Therefore, the karyotype characterization confirmed the hexaploid origin of the studied Bromus species, which differ in relation to the karyogram and the nuclear 2C value. Considering this, cytogenetics and flow cytometry can be used to discriminate Bromus species, contributing to taxonomy and systematic studies and providing information on the evolutionary history of this taxa.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. catharticus had a mean nuclear 2C value of 12.64 pg.

Taxon
B. catharticusBromus catharticuse0
Outcome
mean nuclear 2C valuee0
Value
12.64 pge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bromus catharticus
Bromus catharticus · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean nuclear 2C value ranged from 2C = 12.64 pg for B. catharticus to 2C = 17.92 pg for B. auleticus, meaning a maximum variation of 2C = 5.28 pg, equivalent to 41.70%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–791 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. auleticus had a mean nuclear 2C value of 17.92 pg.

Taxon
B. auleticusBromus auleticuse0
Outcome
mean nuclear 2C valuee0
Value
17.92 pge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bromus auleticus
Bromus auleticus · TaxonANDRÉS GONZÁLEZ · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean nuclear 2C value ranged from 2C = 12.64 pg for B. catharticus to 2C = 17.92 pg for B. auleticus, meaning a maximum variation of 2C = 5.28 pg, equivalent to 41.70%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–791 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three Bromus species had a maximum nuclear 2C variation of 5.28 pg.

Taxon
Bromus speciesBromust0
Outcome
maximum variatione0
Value
5.28 pge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bromus
Bromus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean nuclear 2C value ranged from 2C = 12.64 pg for B. catharticus to 2C = 17.92 pg for B. auleticus, meaning a maximum variation of 2C = 5.28 pg, equivalent to 41.70%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“South American Bromus species:”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–511 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum variation in nuclear 2C value was 41.70%.

Taxon
Bromus speciesBromust0
Outcome
maximum variatione0
Value
41.70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bromus
Bromus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean nuclear 2C value ranged from 2C = 12.64 pg for B. catharticus to 2C = 17.92 pg for B. auleticus, meaning a maximum variation of 2C = 5.28 pg, equivalent to 41.70%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“South American Bromus species:”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–511 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three species shared chromosome number 2n = 6x = 42.

Taxon
Bromus speciesBromust0
Outcome
same chromosome numbere0
Value
2n = 6x = 42e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bromus
Bromus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the three species exhibit the same chromosome number, 2n = 6x = 42, which confirms their hexaploid origin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“South American Bromus species:”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–511 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromosome arm dimensions and karyotype classes differed among the species.

Taxon
Bromus speciesBromust0
Outcome
chromosome morphometry (total, short- and long-arm length) and, consequently, the classe0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bromus
Bromus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the chromosome morphometry (total, short- and long-arm length) and, consequently, the class differed among the karyotypes of the species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“South American Bromus species:”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–511 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Karyograms showed some similar and several distinct chromosome pairs.

Taxon
Bromus speciesBromust0
Outcome
some morphologically similar and several distinct chromosome pairse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bromus
Bromus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some morphologically similar and several distinct chromosome pairs were found.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“South American Bromus species:”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–511 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cytogenetics and flow cytometry can discriminate the Bromus species.

Taxon
Bromus speciesBromuse0
Outcome
discriminate Bromus speciese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bromus
Bromus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cytogenetics and flow cytometry can be used to discriminate Bromus species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1516 · show in text ↑