Abstract
블루베리에서의 갈색날개매미충 산란특성과 산란량 감소를 위한 황색끈끈이 트랩의 효과를 조사하였다. 수관상부, 중부, 하부에서의 갈색날개매미충 난괴 발생율은 각각 56.6~60.2%, 23.8~28.1%, 11.7~19.7%로 반 이상이 상부에 집중 분포하였다. 난괴가 한 개만 발생한 가지비율이 50.9%로 가장 높았으며 난괴수가 2개인 가지비율은 20.5%로 다음으로 높았고, 3개와 4개 이상인 가지비율은 각각 14.6%, 14.0%였다. 황색끈끈이트랩을 1개월간 설치한 결과 갈색날개매미충 유살량은 트랩 당 평균 17.1마리였고, 주당 난괴수는 트랩처리구와 무처리구 각각 0.4, 1.3으로 황색끈끈이트랩을 설치 할 경우 무처리구에 비해 산란량이 1/3로 감소하였다. 즉 황색끈끈이트랩 설치로 갈색날개매미충 산란량을 줄일 수 있을 것으로 기대된다. This study was conducted to investigate the characteristics of oviposition and the effect of density suppression by yellow-colored sticky trap on Ricania shantungensis in blueberry. The occurrence of an egg mass of R. shantungensis in the upper, middle and lower region were 56.6~60.2%, 23.8~28.1% and 11.7~19.7%, respectively. The number of egg masses in the branch was investigated. Percentage of the branch with one egg mass was greatest (50.9%) than with two (20.5%), three (14.6%) and over four (14.0%). The effect of yellow-colored sticky trap to reduce the number of R. shantungensis egg masses in blueberry was also investigated. In a month after yellow sticky trap installation, 17.1 adults of R. shantungensis were attracted per trap. Moreover, the number of egg masses on a tree in yellow-colored sticky trap plot was much lower (0.4) than control (1.3). Consequently, this result shows that use of yellow-colored sticky trap may contribute to decrease ovipisotion rate of R. shantungensis in blueberry.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Ricania egg masses occurred on upper, middle and lower canopy regions at 56.6~60.2%, 23.8~28.1% and 11.7~19.7%, respectively.
- Taxon
- Blueberryt0
- Interactor
- R. shantungensis
Pochazia shantungensise0pest - Outcome
- occurrence of an egg mass of R. shantungensise0
- Value
- 56.6~60.2%, 23.8~28.1% and 11.7~19.7%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The occurrence of an egg mass of R. shantungensis in the upper, middle and lower region were 56.6~60.2%, 23.8~28.1% and 11.7~19.7%, respectively.”
t0“Blueberry”
Claim · model-written summary
Branches with one, two, three, and over four egg masses comprised 50.9%, 20.5%, 14.6%, and 14.0%.
Verbatim
e0“Percentage of the branch with one egg mass was greatest (50.9%) than with two (20.5%), three (14.6%) and over four (14.0%).”
t0“Blueberry”
Claim · model-written summary
Sticky traps attracted 17.1 Ricania adults per trap after one month.
- Taxon
- Blueberryt0
- Treatment
- yellow sticky trap installatione0
- Interactor
- R. shantungensisPochazia shantungensise0pest
- Outcome
- adults of R. shantungensis were attracted per trape0
- Value
- 17.1 adultse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In a month after yellow sticky trap installation, 17.1 adults of R. shantungensis were attracted per trap.”
t0“Blueberry”
Claim · model-written summary
Sticky trap plots had fewer Ricania egg masses per tree than controls, 0.4 versus 1.3.
Verbatim
e0“the number of egg masses on a tree in yellow-colored sticky trap plot was much lower (0.4) than control (1.3).”
t0“Blueberry”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude yellow sticky traps may reduce Ricania oviposition in blueberry.
- Taxon
- blueberrye0
- Interactor
- R. shantungensisPochazia shantungensise0pest
- Outcome
- use of yellow-colored sticky trap may contribute to decrease ovipisotion ratee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“use of yellow-colored sticky trap may contribute to decrease ovipisotion rate of R. shantungensis in blueberry.”
The same questions in other papers
trap barrier · pest · VacciniumResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.