Paper · 2015 · Archives of applied science research

Isolation and characterization of heavy metal resistant PGPR and their role in enhancement of growth of wheat plant under metal (cadmium) stress condition

Chhaya Verma; Pooja Singh; Rajesh Kumar

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In present time excessive use of chemical fertilizers in agricultural field causes the environmental hazards and affects the human and animal health. There is an urgent need to reduce the application of chemical fertilizers. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) is the best alternative of chemical fertilizers, present in root zone of plant and enhanced the plant growth in stress as well as the normal condition. This study was done on heavy metal resistant PGPR, isolated from heavy metal contaminated soil of industrial and agricultural area of Lucknow, Kanpur and Ambedkar Nagar. Out of 27 isolates only 6 were grown on high concentration of cadmium metal. Isolate PBB1 showed 1000 ppm MIC of cadmium and remaining isolates namely PP3, PP2, SNA3, and SNA5 were grown on 800 ppm MIC of cadmium. PGPR screening was done for selection of best PGPR to enhance the growth of wheat plant by production of IAA, ammonia and phosphate solubilization. The pot study was done with 100 ppm cadmium amended soil. When cadmium resistant PGPR were applied on seeds of wheat the growth and germination of plants were enhanced. On comparison of finding result with literature, it may be possible that all the isolates may be fluorescent pseudomonads. The result of pot study showed that the Pseudomonas sp. SNA5 gave the best result in comparison of other isolates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six of 27 isolates grew at high cadmium concentration.

Outcome
isolatese0
Value
6e0
Qualifier
high concentration of cadmium metale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Out of 27 isolates only 6 were grown on high concentration of cadmium metal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–667 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBB1 tolerated 1000 ppm cadmium MIC.

Material
PBB1e0
Outcome
MIC of cadmiume0
Value
1000 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolate PBB1 showed 1000 ppm MIC of cadmium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PP3, PP2, SNA3, and SNA5 grew at 800 ppm cadmium MIC.

Material
PP3, PP2, SNA3, and SNA5e0
Outcome
MIC of cadmiume0
Value
800 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“remaining isolates namely PP3, PP2, SNA3, and SNA5 were grown on 800 ppm MIC of cadmium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying cadmium resistant PGPR to wheat seed enhanced plant growth and germination.

Treatment
cadmium resistant PGPR were applied on seedse0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
growth and germinatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When cadmium resistant PGPR were applied on seeds of wheat the growth and germination of plants were enhanced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas sp. SNA5 performed best among the isolates in the pot study.

Interactor
Pseudomonas sp. SNA5e0symbiont
Outcome
best resulte0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
other isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The result of pot study showed that the Pseudomonas sp. SNA5 gave the best result in comparison of other isolates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1359 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–109 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

110 papers: 20 positive, 90 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 90 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.