Paper · 2017 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Impact of crop rotation sequences on potato in fields inoculated with bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum

Peter Mwaniki; I. N. Wagara; Rhoda Birech; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The potato industry in Kenya is threatened by bacterial wilt because most production areas are infested with the wilt-causing Ralstonia solanacearum and over 50% yield losses have been reported. Continuous cultivation causes soil physical and biological constrains that greatly affect the crop performance and increase proliferation of the bacterium. Rotation with non-host or suppressant plant species could contribute to considerable reduction of bacterial wilt in the subsequent potato crops. This study tested the effect of different crop sequences on R. solanacearum population in the soil, wilting incidence and yield of potato. Two season field experiments were conducted at two sites (Egerton University, Njoro and National Agricultural Research Laboratories (NARL), Kabete) with 17 different crop sequences. Rotations involving brassica and legumes with potato gave a higher emergence percentage compared to the other sequences. The bacterial population was significantly influenced by the different environments from the first season to the third season; F (1, 102) =53.2, P<0.001, F (1, 102) =12.5, P< 0.001 and F (1, 102) =236.8, P<0.001 respectively. There was a significant effect F(16,119)=7.063, P<0.001 of the crop rotation sequences on the wilting incidence of potato. Pre cropping potato with spring onion and barley resulted to a significantly lower wilting incidence compared to all the other crop rotation sequences with a mean of 8.3% across sites. The results showed that Potato-Lablab-Potato and Cabbage-Lablab had the highest yield with 19.9 and of 19.7 tons/ha in the one crop rotations and pre crops to potato respectively. A Genotype x Environmental means versus IPCA scores showed that the yield due to barley-spring onion, spring onion-barley and wheat-spring onion as pre crops were more stable in both locations compared to the other cropping sequences. The study indicates that rotations involving spring onion with the locally grown cereals such as barley and wheat can be utilized in curbing bacterial wilt. Rotations involving lablab and cabbage may also be used to increase the yield of potato in bacterial wilt infested fields. These crops should be used in rotations involving more seasons so as to achieve better effects. Key words: Bacterial wilt, crop rotation, potato yield, Ralstonia solanacearum, wilting incidence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brassica and legume rotations gave higher potato emergence than other sequences.

Treatment
Rotations involving brassica and legumese1
Outcome
emergence percentagee1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
the other sequencese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potato in fields inoculated with bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rotations involving brassica and legumes with potato gave a higher emergence percentage compared to the other sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–936 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial populations varied significantly by environment over the three seasons.

Outcome
bacterial populatione1
Setting
different environmentse1

Not reportedInteractorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potato in fields inoculated with bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“The bacterial population was significantly influenced by the different environments from the first season to the third season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1063 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation sequences significantly affected potato wilting incidence.

Treatment
crop rotation sequencese1
Outcome
wilting incidence of potatoe1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potato in fields inoculated with bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a significant effect F(16,119)=7.063, P<0.001 of the crop rotation sequences on the wilting incidence of potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring onion and barley precrops produced lower potato wilting incidence than all other sequences, averaging 8.3%.

Treatment
spring onion and barleye1
Outcome
wilting incidencee1
Direction
lowere1
Value
8.3%e1
Comparator
all the other crop rotation sequencese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potato in fields inoculated with bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pre cropping potato with spring onion and barley resulted to a significantly lower wilting incidence compared to all the other crop rotation sequences with a mean of 8.3% across sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato-Lablab-Potato gave the highest yield among one-crop rotations at 19.9 tons/ha.

Treatment
Potato-Lablab-Potatoe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
19.9e1
Comparator
one crop rotationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potato in fields inoculated with bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potato-Lablab-Potato and Cabbage-Lablab had the highest yield with 19.9 and of 19.7 tons/ha in the one crop rotations and pre crops to potato respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabbage-Lablab gave the highest potato yield among precrops at 19.7 tons/ha.

Treatment
Cabbage-Lablabe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
19.7 tons/hae1
Comparator
pre crops to potatoe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potato in fields inoculated with bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potato-Lablab-Potato and Cabbage-Lablab had the highest yield with 19.9 and of 19.7 tons/ha in the one crop rotations and pre crops to potato respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley-spring onion precrops gave more stable potato yield across both locations.

Treatment
barley-spring onione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
more stablee1
Comparator
the other cropping sequencese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potato in fields inoculated with bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“the yield due to barley-spring onion, spring onion-barley and wheat-spring onion as pre crops were more stable in both locations compared to the other cropping sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring onion-barley precrops gave more stable potato yield across both locations.

Treatment
spring onion-barleye1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
more stablee1
Comparator
the other cropping sequencese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potato in fields inoculated with bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“the yield due to barley-spring onion, spring onion-barley and wheat-spring onion as pre crops were more stable in both locations compared to the other cropping sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat-spring onion precrops gave more stable potato yield across both locations.

Treatment
wheat-spring onione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
more stablee1
Comparator
the other cropping sequencese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potato in fields inoculated with bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“the yield due to barley-spring onion, spring onion-barley and wheat-spring onion as pre crops were more stable in both locations compared to the other cropping sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1885 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend spring onion rotations with barley and wheat to curb bacterial wilt.

Outcome
curbing bacterial wilte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potato in fields inoculated with bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“rotations involving spring onion with the locally grown cereals such as barley and wheat can be utilized in curbing bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1912–2042 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend lablab and cabbage rotations to increase potato yield.

Outcome
increase the yield of potatoe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potato in fields inoculated with bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rotations involving lablab and cabbage may also be used to increase the yield of potato in bacterial wilt infested fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2165 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend testing these crops in rotations over more seasons.

Outcome
rotations involving more seasonse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potato in fields inoculated with bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“These crops should be used in rotations involving more seasons so as to achieve better effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2167–2261 · show in text ↑

Hordeum vulgare · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Allium cepa · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Allium cepa · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

rotation · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.