Paper · 2017 · Revista de Biología Tropical

Stomatal density, leaf area and plant size variation of Rhizophora mangle (Malpighiales: Rhizophoraceae) along a salinity gradient in the Mexican Caribbean

Joanne R. Peel; Maria C. Mandujano Sanchez; Jorge Lopez Portillo; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In community ecology, the knowledge of abiotic factors, that determine intraspecific variability in ecophysiological and functional traits, is important for addressing major questions, such as plant community assembly and ecosystem functioning. Mangroves have several mechanisms of resistance to salinity and most species exhibit some xeromorphic features in order to conserve water. Leaf area and stomatal density play an important role in maintaining water balance, and gas exchange is regulated by their aperture and density, two traits that vary intraspecifically in response to environmental conditions, such as water stress and salinity. In this study, we evaluated the effects of salinity on stomatal density, leaf area and plant size in R. mangle and we tested for associations among the three variables, across three sites along a natural salinity gradient in the Xel-Há Park, Quintana Roo, Mexico. We hypothesized that high salinity sites would produce smaller plants, with smaller leaves, and fewer stomata. Three sampling sites with different environmental conditions were chosen and salinities were monitored monthly. A total of 542 plants were tagged and tree heights and diameters were measured for each individual within each of the three sampling sites. Three leaves from 20 trees from each site were measured to determine leaf area. Stomatal densities were determined in each leaf using nail polish casts, examining ten 1 mm squares per leaf under an optical microscope. A principal component analysis was used to assess association between tree height, leaf area, and stomatal density for each plot. The salinity gradient was reflected in plant size, producing smaller plants at the higher salinity site. The largest leaves were found at the low salinity site (51.2 ± 24.99 cm2). Leaf length was not correlated to plant size (LL vs. tree height: r= 0.02, P= 0.8205; LL vs. trunk diameter: r= 0.03, P= 0.7336), so we concluded that leaf length is an environmentally plastic trait of red mangroves that may vary as a function of environmental conditions, such as hydric stress caused by elevated salinity. The larger leaves from the low salinity site had lower densities of stomata (65.0 stomata.mm2 SD= 12.3), and increasing salinities did not decrease stomatal density (intermediate salinity site: 73.4 stomata.mm2 SD= 13.5; high salinity site: 74.8 stomata.mm2 SD= 17.3). Our results confirm that stomatal density is inversely related to leaf area (r= -0.29, P < 0.001), especially leaf width (r= -0.31, P < 0.001), and that salinity may increase stomatal density by causing reduction of leaf size.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants were smaller at the higher salinity site.

Taxon
Rhizophora mangleRhizophora manglet0
Outcome
plant sizee0
Direction
smallere0
Setting
higher salinity sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizophora mangle
Rhizophora mangle · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The salinity gradient was reflected in plant size, producing smaller plants at the higher salinity site.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizophora mangle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Largest leaves occurred at the low salinity site, measuring 51.2 ± 24.99 cm2.

Taxon
Rhizophora mangleRhizophora manglet0
Outcome
leavese0
Direction
largeste0
Value
51.2 ± 24.99 cm2e0
Setting
low salinity sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizophora mangle
Rhizophora mangle · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest leaves were found at the low salinity site (51.2 ± 24.99 cm2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizophora mangle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf length was not correlated with tree height.

Taxon
Rhizophora mangleRhizophora manglet0
Outcome
Leaf lengthe0
Direction
not correlatede0
Value
r= 0.02, P= 0.8205e0
Comparator
tree heighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizophora mangle
Rhizophora mangle · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf length was not correlated to plant size (LL vs. tree height: r= 0.02, P= 0.8205; LL vs. trunk diameter: r= 0.03, P= 0.7336)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1799–1927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizophora mangle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf length was not correlated with trunk diameter.

Taxon
Rhizophora mangleRhizophora manglet0
Outcome
Leaf lengthe0
Direction
not correlatede0
Value
r= 0.03, P= 0.7336e0
Comparator
trunk diametere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizophora mangle
Rhizophora mangle · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf length was not correlated to plant size (LL vs. tree height: r= 0.02, P= 0.8205; LL vs. trunk diameter: r= 0.03, P= 0.7336)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1799–1927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizophora mangle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larger leaves at low salinity had lower stomatal density of 65.0 stomata.mm2.

Taxon
Rhizophora mangleRhizophora manglet0
Outcome
densities of stomatae0
Direction
lowere0
Value
65.0 stomata.mm2e0
Setting
low salinity sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizophora mangle
Rhizophora mangle · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The larger leaves from the low salinity site had lower densities of stomata (65.0 stomata.mm2 SD= 12.3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2123–2226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizophora mangle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity did not decrease stomatal density.

Taxon
Rhizophora mangleRhizophora manglet0
Outcome
stomatal densitye0
Direction
did not decreasee0
Setting
intermediate salinity sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizophora mangle
Rhizophora mangle · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing salinities did not decrease stomatal density (intermediate salinity site: 73.4 stomata.mm2 SD= 13.5; high salinity site: 74.8 stomata.mm2 SD= 17.3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2232–2390 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizophora mangle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal density was inversely related to leaf area (r= -0.29, P < 0.001).

Taxon
Rhizophora mangleRhizophora manglet0
Organ / stage
leaf areae0
Outcome
stomatal densitye0
Direction
inversely relatede0
Value
r= -0.29, P < 0.001e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizophora mangle
Rhizophora mangle · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stomatal density is inversely related to leaf area (r= -0.29, P < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2417–2489 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizophora mangle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal density was inversely related to leaf width (r= -0.31, P < 0.001).

Taxon
Rhizophora mangleRhizophora manglet0
Organ / stage
leaf widthe0
Outcome
stomatal densitye1
Direction
inversely relatede1
Value
r= -0.31, P < 0.001e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizophora mangle
Rhizophora mangle · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“especially leaf width (r= -0.31, P < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2491–2534 · show in text ↑
e1

“stomatal density is inversely related to leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2417–2467 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizophora mangle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑