Paper · 2016 · Università degli Studi di Bari

TRIALS FOR THE CONTROL OF THE CITRUS MEALYBUG IN CITRUS ORCHARDS BY AUGMENTATIVE RELEASE OF TWO ENCYRTID PARASITOIDS

Mendel, Z.; Gross, S.; Steinberg, S.; et al.

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

TRIALS FOR THE CONTROL OF THE CITRUS MEALYBUG IN CITRUS ORCHARDS BY AUGMENTATIVE RELEASE OF TWO ENCYRTID PARASITOIDS. Since the 1980s, the citrus mealybug Planococcus citri (Risso) has become a key pest in Israel, owing to intensive planting of highly susceptible varieties, the introduction of Insect Growth Regulators (which adversely affect coccinellids) and the development of resistance to chlorpyrifos. Management of the mealybug populations in citrus orchards by augmentative releases of parasitoids was investigated between 1993 and 1996 in a series of tests involving the release of 5,000-10,000 Leptomastix dactylopii (Howard) (Encyrtidae) per hectare. Results showed no significant effect on the density of the mealybug on the fruits. In general, the establishment of L. dactylopii was poor and population levels were inferior to those of the naturally occurring Anagyrus pseudococci (Girault) (Encyrtidae). In 1996-1997, augmentative early-spring releases of A. pseudococci at the rates of 10,000-50,000 individuals per hectare markedly increased the population density of A. pseudococci during April and June but had no significant effect on either the mealybug infestation or on fruit damage caused by the pest and its fruit moth associates. Key words: grapefruit, persimmon, custard apple, coffee, cacao, Citrus, Diospyros, Annona, life cycle, damage, Coccidoxenoides peregrinus, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, Sympherobius sanctus, mass rearing, cork ring, potato sprout, potato trap, low temperatures, fruit moths.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Releases of Leptomastix dactylopii had no significant effect on mealybug density on citrus fruits

Taxon
citrusCitruse0
Treatment
release of 5,000-10,000 Leptomastix dactylopiie1
Interactor
Planococcus citriPlanococcus citrie0pest
Second interactor
Leptomastix dactylopiiLeptomastix dactylopiie1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
density of the mealybug on the fruitse2
Direction
no significant effecte2
Setting
citrus orchardse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Planococcus citri
Planococcus citri · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKatja Schulz from Washington, D. C., USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Since the 1980s, the citrus mealybug Planococcus citri (Risso) has become a key pest in Israel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Management of the mealybug populations in citrus orchards by augmentative releases of parasitoids was investigated between 1993 and 1996 in a series of tests involving the release of 5,000-10,000 Leptomastix dactylopii (Howard) (Encyrtidae) per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–661 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results showed no significant effect on the density of the mealybug on the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-spring releases of A. pseudococci markedly increased its population density in April and June

Taxon
citrusCitruse0
Treatment
augmentative early-spring releases of A. pseudococcie3
Interactor
A. pseudococciAnagyrus pseudococcie3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
population density of A. pseudococcie3
Direction
markedly increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Since the 1980s, the citrus mealybug Planococcus citri (Risso) has become a key pest in Israel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–212 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 1996-1997, augmentative early-spring releases of A. pseudococci at the rates of 10,000-50,000 individuals per hectare markedly increased the population density of A. pseudococci during April and June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-spring releases of A. pseudococci had no significant effect on mealybug infestation

Taxon
citrusCitruse0
Treatment
augmentative early-spring releases of A. pseudococcie3
Interactor
Planococcus citriPlanococcus citrie0pest
Outcome
mealybug infestatione4
Direction
no significant effecte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Planococcus citri
Planococcus citri · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKatja Schulz from Washington, D. C., USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Since the 1980s, the citrus mealybug Planococcus citri (Risso) has become a key pest in Israel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–212 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 1996-1997, augmentative early-spring releases of A. pseudococci at the rates of 10,000-50,000 individuals per hectare markedly increased the population density of A. pseudococci during April and June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1121 · show in text ↑
e4

“had no significant effect on either the mealybug infestation or on fruit damage caused by the pest and its fruit moth associates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-spring releases of A. pseudococci had no significant effect on fruit damage caused by the pest

Taxon
citrusCitruse0
Treatment
augmentative early-spring releases of A. pseudococcie3
Interactor
Planococcus citriPlanococcus citrie0pest
Outcome
fruit damage caused by the peste4
Direction
no significant effecte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Planococcus citri
Planococcus citri · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKatja Schulz from Washington, D. C., USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Since the 1980s, the citrus mealybug Planococcus citri (Risso) has become a key pest in Israel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–212 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 1996-1997, augmentative early-spring releases of A. pseudococci at the rates of 10,000-50,000 individuals per hectare markedly increased the population density of A. pseudococci during April and June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1121 · show in text ↑
e4

“had no significant effect on either the mealybug infestation or on fruit damage caused by the pest and its fruit moth associates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1254 · show in text ↑

Leptomastix dactylopii · Planococcus citri · CitrusPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.