Paper · 2017 · The Plant Journal

Simultaneous modification of three homoeologs of TaEDR1 by genome editing enhances powdery mildew resistance in wheat

Yunwei Zhang; Yang Bai; Guangheng Wu; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
521
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) incurs significant yield losses from powdery mildew, a major fungal disease caused by Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici (Bgt). enhanced disease resistance1 (EDR1) plays a negative role in the defense response against powdery mildew in Arabidopsis thaliana; however, the edr1 mutant does not show constitutively activated defense responses. This makes EDR1 an ideal target for approaches using new genome-editing tools to improve resistance to powdery mildew. We cloned TaEDR1 from hexaploid wheat and found high similarity among the three homoeologs of EDR1. Knock-down of TaEDR1 by virus-induced gene silencing or RNA interference enhanced resistance to powdery mildew, indicating that TaEDR1 negatively regulates powdery mildew resistance in wheat. We used CRISPR/Cas9 technology to generate Taedr1 wheat plants by simultaneous modification of the three homoeologs of wheat EDR1. No off-target mutations were detected in the Taedr1 mutant plants. The Taedr1 plants were resistant to powdery mildew and did not show mildew-induced cell death. Our study represents the successful generation of a potentially valuable trait using genome-editing technology in wheat and provides germplasm for disease resistance breeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three wheat EDR1 homoeologs were highly similar.

Gene
EDR1e0
Outcome
high similarity among the three homoeologs of EDR1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“found high similarity among the three homoeologs of EDR1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silencing TaEDR1 increased wheat resistance to powdery mildew.

Treatment
Knock-down of TaEDR1 by virus-induced gene silencing or RNA interferencee0
Gene
TaEDR1e0
Outcome
resistance to powdery mildewe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Knock-down of TaEDR1 by virus-induced gene silencing or RNA interference enhanced resistance to powdery mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TaEDR1 negatively regulates wheat resistance to powdery mildew.

Gene
TaEDR1e0
Outcome
powdery mildew resistancee0
Direction
negatively regulatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TaEDR1 negatively regulates powdery mildew resistance in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The edited Taedr1 wheat plants had no detected off-target mutations.

Material
Taedr1 mutant plantse0
Outcome
No off-target mutations were detectede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No off-target mutations were detected in the Taedr1 mutant plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Taedr1 wheat plants resisted powdery mildew.

Material
Taedr1 plantse0
Outcome
resistant to powdery mildewe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Taedr1 plants were resistant to powdery mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Taedr1 wheat plants showed no mildew-induced cell death.

Material
Taedr1 plantse0
Outcome
did not show mildew-induced cell deathe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Taedr1 plants were resistant to powdery mildew and did not show mildew-induced cell death”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑

loss of function · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 81 positive, 96 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 96 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

173 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.