Abstract
In order to investigation of safflower cultivars reaction to different fertilizer, an experimental was carried out in a split plot design based on RCBD with three replications for 2011-2012 year in research farm of Islamic Azad University of saveh, Iran. Treatments were included different fertilizer(bio and chemical fertilizer) in six levels as main plots and spring planting (25 March) and winter safflower varieties as sub plots in three levels (Varamin295, Zarghan279, Goldasht).The result showed that all treatment except than harvest index significant in main factor levels (fertilizers). High plant and seed yield was significant in sub-factor levels (varieties). The result of interaction effect showed that highest seed yield to obtain of Varamin295 variety (3512 kg.ha-1 in a5b3 treatment).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Biological and chemical fertilizer treatments significantly affected the agronomic traits of safflower, except harvest index
- Taxon
- safflower
Carthamus tinctoriuse0 - Treatment
- different fertilizer(bio and chemical fertilizer)e4
- Outcome
- all treatment except than harvest indexe1
- Setting
- research farm of Islamic Azad University of saveh, Irane6
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“investigation of safflower cultivars reaction to different fertilizer”
e1“all treatment except than harvest index significant in main factor levels (fertilizers)”
e4“different fertilizer(bio and chemical fertilizer) in six levels”
e6“in research farm of Islamic Azad University of saveh, Iran”
Claim · model-written summary
Harvest index of safflower was not significantly affected by biological and chemical fertilizer
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriuse0
- Treatment
- different fertilizer(bio and chemical fertilizer)e4
- Outcome
- harvest indexe1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“investigation of safflower cultivars reaction to different fertilizer”
e1“all treatment except than harvest index significant in main factor levels (fertilizers)”
e4“different fertilizer(bio and chemical fertilizer) in six levels”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant and seed yield of safflower differed significantly among the varieties
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriuse0
- Material
- Varamin295, Zarghan279, Goldashte5
- Outcome
- plant and seed yielde2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“investigation of safflower cultivars reaction to different fertilizer”
e2“High plant and seed yield was significant in sub-factor levels (varieties)”
e5“winter safflower varieties as sub plots in three levels (Varamin295, Zarghan279, Goldasht)”
Claim · model-written summary
Varamin295 gave the highest seed yield, 3512 kg/ha, in the a5b3 treatment
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriuse0
- Material
- Varamin295e3
- Treatment
- a5b3e3
- Outcome
- seed yielde3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 3512 kg.ha-1e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“investigation of safflower cultivars reaction to different fertilizer”
e3“highest seed yield to obtain of Varamin295 variety (3512 kg.ha-1 in a5b3 treatment)”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results differ
71 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
68 papers more in this group
See all 72 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.