Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Jasmonic Acid (JA) and Glutamine on Callus Induction of Madagascar Periwinkle Plant (Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush) by in vitro Culture

Ekhlas Meteab Ahmed Al Zuhairi; Nadhm Salim Ghanm

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The current study was conducted to examine the role of Jasmonic acid and Glutamine in callus growth and multiplication. Seeds were germinated after disinfect by NaOCl at 4.5% for 20 min and cultured on full strength Murashige and Skoog (1962)(MS) medium. callus was initiated from Cotyledons explants taken from seeding were cultured growth on MS medium supplemented with different concentration of growth hormone include the Cytokinins Benzyl Amino Purine (BAP) at concentration (0.0,2.0) mg/l. and Auxin Naphthalene Acetic Acid (NAA) at concentration (0.0,1.0,2.0,4.0) mg/l for both growth regulators. Depending upon the result of chemical analysis, the combination of BAP at 2.0 Mg/L with NAA at1.0 Mg/L choised and used Jasmonic acid and Glutamine with different concentration of Jasmonic acid at concentration (0.0, 4.0) mg/l and Glutamine at concentration (250,300,350,400) Mg/L for 8 week culture period in callus induction. The results showed the presence of significant differences between the treatments in the fresh and dry weight of callus after five weeks from culture. 2.0 mg/l BAP treatment was significantly superior on control treatment in fresh and dry weight of callus, which reached 0.335 and 0.160 mg, respectively. Also, the two concentrations of NAA (1.0 mg/l) were significantly superior on control treatment in the same of two characteristics (0.332 and 0.150 mg fresh weight, and dry weight, respectively). The treatment of interaction between BAP and NAA (0.2+1.0 mg.L-1) has given the highest significant difference in fresh and dry weight reached 0.483 and 0.215 mg, respectively. While less fresh and dry weight when treatment was control treatment, which reached 0.0 mg. The 4.0 mg/l Glutamine treatment was significantly superior on control treatment in fresh and dry weight of callus, which reached 290.42 and 40.855 mg, respectively. Also, the 350 mg/l concentration of Glutamine was significantly superior on control treatment in the same of two characteristics (286.38 and 54.664 mg fresh and dry weight). The treatment of interaction between Jasmonic acid and Glutamine (4.0 mg/l + 300 mg/l) has given the highest significant difference in fresh and dry weight reached 345.35 and 54.664 mg, respectively. While less fresh and dry weight when treatment 0 Jasmonic acid + 250 Glutamine mg/l concentrations, which reached 184.47 and 10.18 mg, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus fresh and dry weights differed significantly among treatments after five weeks.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink BlushCatharanthus roseust0
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of calluse0
Qualifier
after five weeks from culturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences between the treatments in the fresh and dry weight of callus after five weeks from culture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BAP treatment increased callus fresh weight relative to control to 0.335 mg.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink BlushCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
2.0 mg/l BAP treatmente0
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of calluse0
Direction
superiore0
Value
0.335e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2.0 mg/l BAP treatment was significantly superior on control treatment in fresh and dry weight of callus, which reached 0.335 and 0.160 mg, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BAP treatment increased callus dry weight relative to control to 0.160 mg.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink BlushCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
2.0 mg/l BAP treatmente0
Outcome
dry weight of calluse0
Direction
superiore0
Value
0.160 mge0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2.0 mg/l BAP treatment was significantly superior on control treatment in fresh and dry weight of callus, which reached 0.335 and 0.160 mg, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA treatment increased callus fresh weight over control to 0.332 mg.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink BlushCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
NAA (1.0 mg/l)e0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
superiore0
Value
0.332e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two concentrations of NAA (1.0 mg/l) were significantly superior on control treatment in the same of two characteristics (0.332 and 0.150 mg fresh weight, and dry weight, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1432 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA treatment increased callus dry weight over control to 0.150 mg.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink BlushCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
NAA (1.0 mg/l)e0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
superiore0
Value
0.150 mge0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two concentrations of NAA (1.0 mg/l) were significantly superior on control treatment in the same of two characteristics (0.332 and 0.150 mg fresh weight, and dry weight, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1432 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined BAP and NAA gave the highest callus fresh weight, 0.483 mg.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink BlushCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
BAP and NAA (0.2+1.0 mg.L-1)e0
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.483e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction between BAP and NAA (0.2+1.0 mg.L-1) has given the highest significant difference in fresh and dry weight reached 0.483 and 0.215 mg, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined BAP and NAA gave the highest callus dry weight, 0.215 mg.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink BlushCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
BAP and NAA (0.2+1.0 mg.L-1)e0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.215 mge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction between BAP and NAA (0.2+1.0 mg.L-1) has given the highest significant difference in fresh and dry weight reached 0.483 and 0.215 mg, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control treatment had the lowest callus fresh and dry weight, 0.0 mg.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink BlushCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
lesse0
Value
0.0 mge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less fresh and dry weight when treatment was control treatment, which reached 0.0 mg.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1701 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported 4.0 mg/l Glutamine treatment raised callus fresh weight over control to 290.42 mg.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink BlushCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
4.0 mg/l Glutamine treatmente0
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of calluse0
Direction
superiore0
Value
290.42e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4.0 mg/l Glutamine treatment was significantly superior on control treatment in fresh and dry weight of callus, which reached 290.42 and 40.855 mg, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1706–1867 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported 4.0 mg/l Glutamine treatment raised callus dry weight over control to 40.855 mg.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink BlushCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
4.0 mg/l Glutamine treatmente0
Outcome
dry weight of calluse0
Direction
superiore0
Value
40.855 mge0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4.0 mg/l Glutamine treatment was significantly superior on control treatment in fresh and dry weight of callus, which reached 290.42 and 40.855 mg, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1706–1867 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutamine at 350 mg/l raised callus fresh weight over control to 286.38 mg.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink BlushCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
350 mg/l concentration of Glutaminee0
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
superiore0
Value
286.38e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“350 mg/l concentration of Glutamine was significantly superior on control treatment in the same of two characteristics (286.38 and 54.664 mg fresh and dry weight).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–2041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutamine at 350 mg/l raised callus dry weight over control to 54.664 mg.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink BlushCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
350 mg/l concentration of Glutaminee0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
superiore0
Value
54.664 mge0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“350 mg/l concentration of Glutamine was significantly superior on control treatment in the same of two characteristics (286.38 and 54.664 mg fresh and dry weight).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–2041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Jasmonic acid with glutamine gave the highest callus fresh weight, 345.35 mg.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink BlushCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
Jasmonic acid and Glutamine (4.0 mg/l + 300 mg/l)e0
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
345.35e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction between Jasmonic acid and Glutamine (4.0 mg/l + 300 mg/l) has given the highest significant difference in fresh and dry weight reached 345.35 and 54.664 mg, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2059–2241 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Jasmonic acid with glutamine gave the highest callus dry weight, 54.664 mg.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink BlushCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
Jasmonic acid and Glutamine (4.0 mg/l + 300 mg/l)e0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
54.664 mge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction between Jasmonic acid and Glutamine (4.0 mg/l + 300 mg/l) has given the highest significant difference in fresh and dry weight reached 345.35 and 54.664 mg, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2059–2241 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero jasmonic acid with 250 glutamine gave lower callus fresh weight, 184.47 mg.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink BlushCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
0 Jasmonic acid + 250 Glutamine mg/l concentrationse0
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
lesse0
Value
184.47e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less fresh and dry weight when treatment 0 Jasmonic acid + 250 Glutamine mg/l concentrations, which reached 184.47 and 10.18 mg, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2248–2390 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero jasmonic acid with 250 glutamine gave lower callus dry weight, 10.18 mg.

Taxon
Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink BlushCatharanthus roseust0
Treatment
0 Jasmonic acid + 250 Glutamine mg/l concentrationse0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
lesse0
Value
10.18 mge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Catharanthus roseus
Catharanthus roseus · Taxonimbeaul · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less fresh and dry weight when treatment 0 Jasmonic acid + 250 Glutamine mg/l concentrations, which reached 184.47 and 10.18 mg, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2248–2390 · show in text ↑
t0

“Catharanthus roseus L. cv. Nirvana Pink Blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–140 · show in text ↑

jasmonic acid · growth · Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar periwinkle)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar periwinkle)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar periwinkle)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.