Abstract
The field experiment was conducted during summer 2015 and 2016 under irrigated condition to study the effect of land configurations and deficit irrigation on maize at the Main Agriculture Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka. The treatments include land configurations (Broad bed and furrow; BBF, corrugated furrow and ridges and furrow methods) and irrigation levels (Irrigation once in ten days, irrigation at 40, 50 and 60 per cent depletion). Results revealed that, ridges and furrow (70.6 q ha-1) and corrugated furrow method (68.9 q ha-1) produced significantly higher and on par grain yield as compared to BBF method of planting (60.9 q ha-1). Whereas, irrigation at 50 per cent (69.7 q ha-1) and 40 per cent (69.6 q ha-1) depletion recorded significantly higher and at par grain yield over other irrigation levels. The combined effect of corrugated furrow method with irrigation at 50 depletion (grain yield of 74.9 q ha-1) and ridges and furrow method with irrigation at 40 (grain yield of 72.8 q ha-1) as well as irrigation at 50 per cent depletion significantly enhanced the growth and yield attributes as compared to the rest of the treatment combinations. BBF method with irrigation at 60 per cent depletion recorded significantly lowest growth and yield parameters of maize.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Ridges and furrow planting gave significantly higher grain yield than BBF.
- Treatment
- ridges and furrowe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 70.6 q ha-1e0
- Qualifier
- 60.9 q ha-1e0
- Comparator
- BBF method of plantinge0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“ridges and furrow (70.6 q ha-1) and corrugated furrow method (68.9 q ha-1) produced significantly higher and on par grain yield as compared to BBF method of planting (60.9 q ha-1)”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Corrugated furrow planting gave significantly higher grain yield than BBF.
- Treatment
- corrugated furrow methode0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 68.9 q ha-1e0
- Qualifier
- 60.9 q ha-1e0
- Comparator
- BBF method of plantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“ridges and furrow (70.6 q ha-1) and corrugated furrow method (68.9 q ha-1) produced significantly higher and on par grain yield as compared to BBF method of planting (60.9 q ha-1)”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Ridges and corrugated furrow methods yielded on par.
- Outcome
- on par grain yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“ridges and furrow (70.6 q ha-1) and corrugated furrow method (68.9 q ha-1) produced significantly higher and on par grain yield”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 50 percent depletion yielded significantly more grain than other irrigation levels.
- Treatment
- irrigation at 50 per cente0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 69.7 q ha-1e0
- Comparator
- other irrigation levelse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“irrigation at 50 per cent (69.7 q ha-1) and 40 per cent (69.6 q ha-1) depletion recorded significantly higher and at par grain yield over other irrigation levels”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 40 percent depletion yielded significantly more grain than other irrigation levels.
- Treatment
- 40 per cente0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 69.6 q ha-1e0
- Comparator
- other irrigation levelse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“irrigation at 50 per cent (69.7 q ha-1) and 40 per cent (69.6 q ha-1) depletion recorded significantly higher and at par grain yield over other irrigation levels”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 50 and 40 percent depletion gave at-par grain yields.
- Outcome
- at par grain yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“irrigation at 50 per cent (69.7 q ha-1) and 40 per cent (69.6 q ha-1) depletion recorded significantly higher and at par grain yield”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Corrugated furrows with irrigation at 50 depletion enhanced growth and yield attributes over other combinations, with grain yield of 74.9 q ha-1.
- Treatment
- corrugated furrow method with irrigation at 50 depletione0
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributese0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 74.9 q ha-1e0
- Comparator
- the rest of the treatment combinationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“corrugated furrow method with irrigation at 50 depletion (grain yield of 74.9 q ha-1) and ridges and furrow method with irrigation at 40 (grain yield of 72.8 q ha-1) as well as irrigation at 50 per cent depletion significantly enhanced the growth and yield attributes as compared to the rest of the treatment combinations”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Ridges and furrows with irrigation at 40 enhanced growth and yield attributes over other combinations, with grain yield of 72.8 q ha-1.
- Treatment
- ridges and furrow method with irrigation at 40e0
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributese0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 72.8 q ha-1e0
- Comparator
- the rest of the treatment combinationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“corrugated furrow method with irrigation at 50 depletion (grain yield of 74.9 q ha-1) and ridges and furrow method with irrigation at 40 (grain yield of 72.8 q ha-1) as well as irrigation at 50 per cent depletion significantly enhanced the growth and yield attributes as compared to the rest of the treatment combinations”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
BBF with irrigation at 60 percent depletion gave the lowest maize growth and yield parameters.
- Treatment
- BBF method with irrigation at 60 per cent depletione0
- Outcome
- growth and yield parameterse0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“BBF method with irrigation at 60 per cent depletion recorded significantly lowest growth and yield parameters of maize”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,012 papers more in this group
See all 1,016 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.