Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zero tillage with sprinkler irrigation at branching and pod formation increased maize yield by 33.1% compared with conventional tillage and flood irrigation.

A claim from Conservation tillage and sprinkler irrigation for sustainable water management and enhanced crop yields in maize and field pea cropping system · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with sprinkler irrigation at branching and pod formation increased maize yield by 33.1% compared with conventional tillage and flood irrigation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
ZT with sprinkler irrigation at branching + pod formation stagese1
Outcome
maize yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
33.1% (CI 95%)e1
Comparator
CT and flood irrigatione1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in a maize (Zea mays L.) and field pea (Pisum sativum L.) cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–689
e1

“The ZT with sprinkler irrigation at branching + pod formation stages significantly increased field pea yield by 70% (CI 95%) and maize yield by 33.1% (CI 95%) compared with CT and flood irrigation (conventional practice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1342

Title

Conservation tillage and sprinkler irrigation for sustainable water management and enhanced crop yields in maize and field pea cropping system

Raghavendra Singh; C. P. Nath; C. S. Praharaj; et al. Scientific Reports 2026. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-39809-5

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-dae0d3c4a32caa7bd138f4f525cc02b42f94f84d1611a6fd02f3f8665c7d3b19 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this claim · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,007 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.