Paper · 1999 · UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa)

Planting Method and Fertilization Timing Effects on Ridge-Till Corn

Keith A. Kohler; Mohammadreza Ghaffarzadeh; Richard M. Cruse

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Fertilizer application technology has improved fertilizer use efficiency in ridge-till systems, but little work on planting methods and application timing within these systems has been done. A study was conducted to evaluate corn (Zea mays 1.) response to injected nitrogen (N) fertilizer applied to different planting methods at common application times. The performance of the late spring soil nitrate and the basal stalk nitrate tests was examined within these systems. A continuous corn and a corn-soybean [Glycine max (1) Merr.] rotation were used in 1989-1991 at two Iowa locations on Nicolett and Monona series soils, line-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludolls and line-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludolls, respectively. Whole plot treatments were: 1) till planting with fertilizer N applied at layby; 2) slot planting with fertilizer N applied at planting; and 3) slot planting with fertilizer N applied at layby. Subplot treatments (0, 22, 45, 90, 157, and 224 kg N ha-1) were imposed on the whole-plots. The late spring soil nitrate test had consistently low values relative to the scale used for N fertilizer recommendations. The basal stalk nitrate test identified optima nitrate concentrations relating to N fertilizer rates which produced maximum yields. Whole plot treatments generally did not differ significantly in grain yield. Alternative methods of fertilizing corn, such as the use of point injection application equipment, provide opportunities in fertilizer N management that current recommendation tools may enhance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The late spring soil nitrate test had consistently low values relative to the fertilizer recommendation scale.

Outcome
late spring soil nitrate teste0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
the scale used for N fertilizer recommendationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“The late spring soil nitrate test had consistently low values relative to the scale used for N fertilizer recommendations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1136 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The basal stalk nitrate test identified optimum nitrate concentrations associated with rates producing maximum corn yields.

Outcome
basal stalk nitrate teste0
Value
maximum yieldse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“The basal stalk nitrate test identified optima nitrate concentrations relating to N fertilizer rates which produced maximum yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole plot planting and fertilization treatments generally did not differ significantly in corn grain yield.

Treatment
Whole plot treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
Whole plot treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“Whole plot treatments generally did not differ significantly in grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1345 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Point injection application equipment may offer opportunities for improved fertilizer nitrogen management.

Treatment
point injection application equipmente0
Outcome
opportunities in fertilizer N managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“Alternative methods of fertilizing corn, such as the use of point injection application equipment, provide opportunities in fertilizer N management that current recommendation tools may enhance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1540 · show in text ↑