Paper · 2015 · INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS

Private and social cost of use of fertilizer and drip system in agriculture - A study on 'fertilizer and drip subsidy' in sugarcane cultivation in Tamil Nadu, India

P. ASHA PRIYANKA; M. CHANDRASEKARAN

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The demand for fertilizers in India is being supplied with humongous import of fertilizer apart domestic production. The price of fertilizers both controlled (Urea 'N') and decontrolled (phosphorus 'P' and Potash 'K') are regularised by the Government with subsidy. Around 30 per cent of total subsidy bill in Union Budget (2014-15) is allocated for fertilizer subsidy in India. The study has the objective to impart the importance of fertilizer subsidy bill in India with reference to farmers and production of sugarcane. The study with the carefully forged research, attempted to find the private cost, social cost of fertilizer, Resource Use Efficiency (RUE) of essential nutrients with and without subsidy; and production loss when the subsidy is withdrawn by the Government. The fourth advances estimate of India on sugarcane production is 350.02 m. tones but when the subsidy bill on fertilizer is withdrawn then our production will be short by around 53 m. tonnes. To substantiate, the RUE will decline when fertilizer subsidy is withdrawn. Likewise, adoption per cent of drip irrigation will decline when micro-irrigation subsidy is withdrawn by the Government.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated sugarcane production would fall by about 53 m. tonnes if fertilizer subsidy were withdrawn.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
subsidy bill on fertilizer is withdrawne0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
shorte0
Value
53 m. tonnese0
Comparator
350.02 m. tonese0
Setting
Indiae0

Verbatim

e0

“The fourth advances estimate of India on sugarcane production is 350.02 m. tones but when the subsidy bill on fertilizer is withdrawn then our production will be short by around 53 m. tonnes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Resource use efficiency was projected to decline with withdrawal of fertilizer subsidy.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
fertilizer subsidy is withdrawne0
Outcome
RUEe0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the RUE will decline when fertilizer subsidy is withdrawn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation adoption was projected to decline after micro-irrigation subsidy withdrawal.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
micro-irrigation subsidy is withdrawne0
Outcome
adoption per cent of drip irrigatione0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“adoption per cent of drip irrigation will decline when micro-irrigation subsidy is withdrawn by the Government.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–143 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 312 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.