Paper · 2017 · Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia)

Yield components of sweet corn (Zea mays) and some soil physical properties towards different tillage methods and plant population

Shamsabadi, Hossein-Ali Tash; Ahmad, Desa; Azmi, Yahya; et al.

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of three tillage systems and three corn plant populations on selected soil physical properties and yield components of sweet corn for Serdang soil series (Typic Paleodults) at the research farm of University Putra Malaysia (UPM) in Malaysia. The experimental design with three replications was a 2×3 factorial treatments based on randomized complete block design (RCBD) for soil analysis and a 3×3 factorial treatments based on RCBD for yield and yield components analysis of sweet corn (Zea mays). The three tillage systems were moldboard plow followed by once disc harrowing (MPD), disc plow followed by once disc harrowing (DPD) and rotary cultivator (RC) only, as control on soil physical properties at two depths of 0-10 cm and 20-30 cm; and also their effects on yield and selected yield components of sweet corn at three seeding rates or seed spacing of 20, 30 and 40 cm. The results showed that the measured soil physical properties were homogeneous at three plots and the two depths. Although WI (water infiltration) was higher and resistance to penetration (RP) was lower in RC plot at the upper layer, this condition had no influence on crop yield. The highest and minimum value of crop yield at given seed spacing occurred in DPD plot and MPD and RC plots, respectively. Interaction effects of the two factors, tillage and planting density were found to be significant on row length of kernels on cob corn, yield of sweet corn and total weight of dry matter.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Measured soil physical properties were homogeneous across three plots and two depths.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Outcome
soil physical propertiese0

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the measured soil physical properties were homogeneous at three plots and the two depths.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water infiltration was higher in the rotary cultivator plot at the upper soil layer.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
rotary cultivator (RC)e1
Outcome
water infiltratione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
upper layere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“WI (water infiltration) was higher and resistance to penetration (RP) was lower in RC plot at the upper layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1171 · show in text ↑
e1

“rotary cultivator (RC) only, as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance to penetration was lower in the rotary cultivator plot at the upper soil layer.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
rotary cultivator (RC)e1
Outcome
resistance to penetration (RP)e0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
upper layere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“resistance to penetration (RP) was lower in RC plot at the upper layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1171 · show in text ↑
e1

“rotary cultivator (RC) only, as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The upper layer soil infiltration and penetration differences had no influence on sweet corn yield.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
RC plote1
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
no influencee0

Verbatim

e0

“this condition had no influence on crop yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1219 · show in text ↑
e1

“WI (water infiltration) was higher and resistance to penetration (RP) was lower in RC plot at the upper layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the given seed spacing, the disc plow and disc harrow plot had the highest sweet corn yield.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
disc plow followed by once disc harrowinge1
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
MPD and RC plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest and minimum value of crop yield at given seed spacing occurred in DPD plot and MPD and RC plots, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1342 · show in text ↑
e1

“disc plow followed by once disc harrowing (DPD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the given seed spacing, moldboard plow and disc harrow plots had minimum sweet corn yield.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
moldboard plow followed by once disc harrowinge1
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
DPD plote0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest and minimum value of crop yield at given seed spacing occurred in DPD plot and MPD and RC plots, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1342 · show in text ↑
e1

“moldboard plow followed by once disc harrowing (MPD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the given seed spacing, rotary cultivator plots had minimum sweet corn yield.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
rotary cultivator (RC) onlye1
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
DPD plote0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest and minimum value of crop yield at given seed spacing occurred in DPD plot and MPD and RC plots, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1342 · show in text ↑
e1

“rotary cultivator (RC) only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage and planting density had a significant interaction effect on kernel row length on the cob.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
tillage and planting densitye0
Outcome
row length of kernels on cob corne0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effects of the two factors, tillage and planting density were found to be significant on row length of kernels on cob corn, yield of sweet corn and total weight of dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage and planting density had a significant interaction effect on sweet corn yield.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
tillage and planting densitye0
Outcome
yield of sweet corne0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effects of the two factors, tillage and planting density were found to be significant on row length of kernels on cob corn, yield of sweet corn and total weight of dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage and planting density had a significant interaction effect on total dry matter weight.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
tillage and planting densitye0
Outcome
total weight of dry mattere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effects of the two factors, tillage and planting density were found to be significant on row length of kernels on cob corn, yield of sweet corn and total weight of dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 · show in text ↑

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 5 positive, 8 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.