Paper · 2015 · Universal Journal of Plant Science

Response of Cowpea to Symbiotic Microorganisms Inoculation (Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Rhizobium) in Cultivated Soils in Senegal

Francis Augustin Do Rego; Ibou Diop; Oumar Sadio; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The response of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (Walp. (L.)] to inoculation with symbiotic microorganisms (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and rhizobium) was investigated on cultivated vertisoils (known locally as Dek) and arenosoils (known locally as Dior) in three geographic sites in Senegal. On the basis of soil physico-chemical characteristics, of most probable number (MPN) of indigenous rhizobia and of yields, a hierarchical analysis showed that the sites were grouped in three clusters. Some soils initially considered as Dek were grouped with Dior, so that all of Dior soils were grouped in the same cluster. No significant increasing in shoot biomass or yield was observed when cowpea was inoculated with fungi alone, whatever soil type. However, a significant or noticeable improvement in cowpea seeds production was obtained by rhizobium inoculation. It appeared that cowpea response to inoculation depended on geographical site and were often observed in sandy arenosoils (Dior type) or in loamy sand vertisoils (Dek type) with at least 15mgkg-1 of available phosphorus level.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation of cowpea with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alone gave no significant increase in shoot biomass or yield, whatever the soil type.

Treatment
inoculated with fungi alonee3
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal funguse0symbiont
Outcome
shoot biomass or yielde3
Direction
No significant increasinge3
Qualifier
whatever soil typee3
Setting
three geographic sites in Senegale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (Walp. (L.)] to inoculation with symbiotic microorganisms (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and rhizobium) was investigated on cultivated vertisoils (known locally as Dek) and arenosoils (known locally as Dior) in three geographic sites in Senegal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–286 · show in text ↑
e3

“No significant increasing in shoot biomass or yield was observed when cowpea was inoculated with fungi alone, whatever soil type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–740 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation gave a significant or noticeable improvement in cowpea seed production.

Treatment
rhizobium inoculatione4
Interactor
rhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
seeds productione4
Direction
improvemente4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (Walp. (L.)] to inoculation with symbiotic microorganisms (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and rhizobium) was investigated on cultivated vertisoils (known locally as Dek) and arenosoils (known locally as Dior) in three geographic sites in Senegal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–286 · show in text ↑
e4

“a significant or noticeable improvement in cowpea seeds production was obtained by rhizobium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–855 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cowpea response to inoculation depended on geographical site.

Outcome
response to inoculatione5
Setting
geographical sitee5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (Walp. (L.)] to inoculation with symbiotic microorganisms (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and rhizobium) was investigated on cultivated vertisoils (known locally as Dek) and arenosoils (known locally as Dior) in three geographic sites in Senegal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–286 · show in text ↑
e5

“It appeared that cowpea response to inoculation depended on geographical site and were often observed in sandy arenosoils (Dior type) or in loamy sand vertisoils (Dek type) with at least 15mgkg-1 of available phosphorus level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1082 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cowpea response to inoculation was often observed in sandy arenosoils or loamy sand vertisoils with at least 15 mg/kg available phosphorus.

Outcome
response to inoculatione5
Qualifier
at least 15mgkg-1 of available phosphorus levele5
Setting
sandy arenosoils (Dior type)e5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (Walp. (L.)] to inoculation with symbiotic microorganisms (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and rhizobium) was investigated on cultivated vertisoils (known locally as Dek) and arenosoils (known locally as Dior) in three geographic sites in Senegal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–286 · show in text ↑
e5

“It appeared that cowpea response to inoculation depended on geographical site and were often observed in sandy arenosoils (Dior type) or in loamy sand vertisoils (Dek type) with at least 15mgkg-1 of available phosphorus level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1082 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A hierarchical analysis grouped the sites into three clusters on soil characteristics, rhizobia counts and yields.

Outcome
grouped in three clusterse1
Qualifier
hierarchical analysise1
Setting
three geographic sites in Senegale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (Walp. (L.)] to inoculation with symbiotic microorganisms (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and rhizobium) was investigated on cultivated vertisoils (known locally as Dek) and arenosoils (known locally as Dior) in three geographic sites in Senegal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“a hierarchical analysis showed that the sites were grouped in three clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–487 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some soils initially considered as Dek were grouped with Dior, and all Dior soils fell in one cluster.

Outcome
grouped with Diore2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (Walp. (L.)] to inoculation with symbiotic microorganisms (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and rhizobium) was investigated on cultivated vertisoils (known locally as Dek) and arenosoils (known locally as Dior) in three geographic sites in Senegal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–286 · show in text ↑
e2

“Some soils initially considered as Dek were grouped with Dior, so that all of Dior soils were grouped in the same cluster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–610 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 99 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

inoculation · Rhizobium · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.