Paper · 1944 · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University)

Hemp production experiments cultural practices and soil requirements

C. P. Wilsie; C. A. Black; Andrew R. Aandahl

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Experiments on the rate of seeding hemp in two locations in 1942 indicated that no significant differences in the yield of retted straw were obtained when the seeding rate was varied from 3 to 5 pecks per acre. The percentage of fiber, however, appeared to increase slightly with an increase in the seeding rate, indicating that a higher total yield of fiber might be expected when the higher seeding rates were used. In 1943, studies on stand in four locations showed that the total stand of plants and the stand of small and dead plants increased rapidly with an increase in rate of seeding, while the stand o desirable plants (4 feet or more in height) increased at a much slower rate. Where there was an excess of nitrogen and the hemp grew extremely tall and rank, much self-thinning occurred, resulting in a relatively thin stand of coarse stalks, a condition not desirable for the production of high quality fiber. In general, in 1943 as in 1942, there were no significant differences in the yield of retted straw when the seeding rate was varied within rather wide limits. At Kanawha the 5-peck rate outyielded other seeding rates, but there was no definite trend in yield as affected by rate of seeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rates from 3 to 5 pecks per acre did not significantly change retted straw yield in 1942.

Treatment
seeding rate was varied from 3 to 5 pecks per acree0
Outcome
yield of retted strawe0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
3 to 5 pecks per acree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences in the yield of retted straw were obtained when the seeding rate was varied from 3 to 5 pecks per acre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–209 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber percentage appeared to rise slightly as seeding rate increased.

Treatment
seeding ratee0
Outcome
percentage of fibere0
Direction
increase slightlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of fiber, however, appeared to increase slightly with an increase in the seeding rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–311 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total stand and the stand of small and dead plants rose rapidly as seeding rate increased.

Treatment
rate of seedinge0
Outcome
total stand of plants and the stand of small and dead plantse0
Direction
increased rapidlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total stand of plants and the stand of small and dead plants increased rapidly with an increase in rate of seeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stand of desirable plants increased more slowly with seeding rate.

Outcome
stand o desirable plantse0
Direction
increased at a much slower ratee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the stand o desirable plants (4 feet or more in height) increased at a much slower rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess nitrogen and extremely tall growth caused self-thinning and a thin stand of coarse stalks.

Treatment
excess of nitrogene0
Outcome
much self-thinning occurrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Where there was an excess of nitrogen and the hemp grew extremely tall and rank, much self-thinning occurred, resulting in a relatively thin stand of coarse stalks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Across broad seeding rates in 1943, retted straw yield had no significant differences.

Treatment
seeding rate was varied within rather wide limitse0
Outcome
yield of retted strawe0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant differences in the yield of retted straw when the seeding rate was varied within rather wide limits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Kanawha, the 5-peck rate outyielded other seeding rates.

Treatment
5-peck ratee0
Outcome
outyieldede0
Direction
outyieldede0
Comparator
other seeding ratese0
Setting
Kanawhae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Kanawha the 5-peck rate outyielded other seeding rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.