Paper · 2006 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Seeding rate and row spacing effect on weed competition, yield and quality of hemp in the Parkland region of Saskatchewan

C. L. Vera; S. M. Woods; J. P. Raney

8
claims
22
verbatim quotes
41
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted on a Black Chernozem silty loam soil at Melfort, Saskatchewan, Canada, from 2000 to 2002, to determine the effect of seeding rate and row spacing on weed competition, as well as on seed, shoot biomass production and seed q uality attributes of industrial hemp ( Cannabis sativa L. ‘Fasamo’ and ‘Finola’). Increasing seeding rate from 20 to 60 or 80 kg ha -1 decreased weed density in all years (average of 33%) and reduced weed size (34%) in 2000. It also increased hemp plant density, biomass and seed yield (average of 174, 23 and 34%, respectively). Seed weight and protein were not affected by seeding rates, but seed oil content increased 1% in one year, when seeding rate increased from 20 to 60 kg ha -1 . Row spacing (18 and 36 cm) had little or no definite effect on most of the parameters studied. Key words: Biomass, cultivar, hemp, protein content, oil content, organic farming, row spacing, seeding rate, weed competition

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seeding rate from 20 kg ha-1 decreased weed density (average 33%) in all years.

Treatment
Increasing seeding rate from 20 to 60 or 80 kg ha -1e1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed densitye1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
33%e1
Qualifier
in all yearse1
Comparator
from 20e1
Setting
Melfort, Saskatchewane3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing seeding rate from 20 to 60 or 80 kg ha -1 decreased weed density in all years (average of 33%) and reduced weed size (34%) in 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–479 · show in text ↑
e3

“Melfort, Saskatchewan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seeding rate from 20 kg ha-1 reduced weed size (34%) in 2000.

Treatment
Increasing seeding rate from 20 to 60 or 80 kg ha -1e1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed sizee1
Direction
reducede1
Value
34%e1
Qualifier
in 2000e1
Comparator
from 20e1
Setting
Melfort, Saskatchewane3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing seeding rate from 20 to 60 or 80 kg ha -1 decreased weed density in all years (average of 33%) and reduced weed size (34%) in 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–479 · show in text ↑
e3

“Melfort, Saskatchewan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seeding rate from 20 kg ha-1 increased hemp plant density (174).

Treatment
Increasing seeding rate from 20 to 60 or 80 kg ha -1e2
Outcome
plant densitye4
Direction
increasede4
Value
174e4
Comparator
from 20e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increasing seeding rate from 20 to 60 or 80 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–390 · show in text ↑
e4

“It also increased hemp plant density, biomass and seed yield (average of 174, 23 and 34%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seeding rate from 20 kg ha-1 increased hemp biomass (23%).

Treatment
Increasing seeding rate from 20 to 60 or 80 kg ha -1e2
Outcome
biomasse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
23e4
Comparator
from 20e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increasing seeding rate from 20 to 60 or 80 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–390 · show in text ↑
e4

“It also increased hemp plant density, biomass and seed yield (average of 174, 23 and 34%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seeding rate from 20 kg ha-1 increased hemp seed yield (34%).

Treatment
Increasing seeding rate from 20 to 60 or 80 kg ha -1e2
Outcome
seed yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Value
34%e4
Comparator
from 20e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increasing seeding rate from 20 to 60 or 80 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–390 · show in text ↑
e4

“It also increased hemp plant density, biomass and seed yield (average of 174, 23 and 34%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed weight and protein of hemp were not affected by seeding rate.

Treatment
seeding ratese5
Outcome
Seed weight and proteine5
Direction
not affectede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–82 · show in text ↑
e5

“Seed weight and protein were not affected by seeding rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed oil content of hemp increased by 1% in one year when seeding rate increased from 20 kg ha-1.

Treatment
seeding rate increased from 20 to 60 kg ha -1e6
Outcome
seed oil contente6
Direction
increasede6
Value
1%e6
Qualifier
in one yeare6
Comparator
from 20e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–82 · show in text ↑
e6

“but seed oil content increased 1% in one year, when seeding rate increased from 20 to 60 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing of 18 and 36 cm had little or no definite effect on most parameters of hemp.

Treatment
Row spacinge7
Outcome
most of the parameters studiede7
Direction
little or no definite effecte7
Setting
Melfort, Saskatchewane3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–82 · show in text ↑
e7

“Row spacing (18 and 36 cm) had little or no definite effect on most of the parameters studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–839 · show in text ↑
e3

“Melfort, Saskatchewan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–94 · show in text ↑

density · weed · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

density · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

density · yield · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.