Paper · 2015 · Environment Technology Resources Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference

Investigation of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) crop weediness

Zofija Jankauskienė; Elvyra Gruzdevienė; Natalija Burbulis; et al.

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The investigation of hemp crop weediness was carried out at the Upytė Experimental Station of the Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry in 2014. Bi-factorial trial was carried out: Factor A – variety (A1 – USO 31; A2 – Bialobrzeskie); Factor B – sowing rate (B1 – 45 kg ha-1; B2 – 70 kg ha-1). Data showed that seed rate had a significant influence on crop density at full hemp emergence as well as at harvesting time. Rainy vegetation period was favourable not only for hemp growing, but for weeds as well. Crop density (resulted by seed rate) had a significant influence on crop weediness – significantly more weeds (in average 166 plants m-2) were found in the plots with seed rate of 45 kg ha-1, consequently at lower crop density, and under 140 weed plants m-2 were found in the plots with seed rate of 70 kg ha-1, consequently at higher crop density. Hemp crop weediness at harvesting time was much lower than that at the beginning of vegetation; reduction of weediness over the vegetation period was close to 87-90 percent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed rate significantly affected hemp density at full emergence.

Treatment
seed ratee0
Outcome
crop density at full hemp emergencee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Data showed that seed rate had a significant influence on crop density at full hemp emergence as well as at harvesting time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed rate significantly affected hemp density at harvest.

Treatment
seed ratee0
Outcome
crop densitye0
Qualifier
harvesting timee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Data showed that seed rate had a significant influence on crop density at full hemp emergence as well as at harvesting time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–436 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rainy vegetation period favored hemp growth.

Outcome
hemp growinge0
Direction
favourablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rainy vegetation period was favourable not only for hemp growing, but for weeds as well.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–525 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rainy vegetation period also favored weeds in hemp.

Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
favourablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rainy vegetation period was favourable not only for hemp growing, but for weeds as well.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 45 kg ha-1, hemp plots had significantly more weeds, averaging 166 plants m-2, than at 70 kg ha-1.

Treatment
seed rate of 45 kg ha-1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
moree0
Value
166 plants m-2e0
Comparator
seed rate of 70 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly more weeds (in average 166 plants m-2) were found in the plots with seed rate of 45 kg ha-1, consequently at lower crop density, and under 140 weed plants m-2 were found in the plots with seed rate of 70 kg ha-1, consequently at higher crop density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 70 kg ha-1, hemp plots had under 140 weed plants m-2.

Treatment
seed rate of 70 kg ha-1e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed plantse0
Value
under 140 weed plants m-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under 140 weed plants m-2 were found in the plots with seed rate of 70 kg ha-1, consequently at higher crop density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hemp weediness fell about 87-90 percent by harvest relative to early vegetation.

Interactor
weedinesse0weed
Outcome
crop weedinesse0
Direction
much lowere0
Value
87-90 percente0
Comparator
beginning of vegetatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hemp crop weediness at harvesting time was much lower than that at the beginning of vegetation; reduction of weediness over the vegetation period was close to 87-90 percent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1048 · show in text ↑

density · weed · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.