Abstract
In this study, determining of reduced tillage techniques in green bean farming as a second crop after harvesting wheat was targeted. To this aim, four different soil tillage methods namely, heavy-duty disc harrow (HD), rotary tiller (ROT), heavy-duty disc harrow plus rotary tiller (HD+ROT) and no-tillage (NT) (seeding by direct drill) were examined. Experiments were arranged in a randomized block design with three replications. The highest green beans yields were obtained in HD+ROT and NT as 5,862.1 and 5,829.3 Mg/ha, respectively. The lowest green bean yield was found in HD as 3,076.7 Mg/ha. The highest fuel consumption was measured 30.60 L ha-1 for HD+ROT whereas the lowest value was found 7.50 L ha-1 for NT. No tillage method gave the best results for fuel consumption and effective power requirement. It is concluded that no-tillage method can be used in second crop green bean in the Thrace Region due to economic and erosion conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Heavy-duty disc harrow plus rotary tiller gave the highest green bean yield, 5,862.1.
- Taxon
- green beane1
- Treatment
- heavy-duty disc harrow plus rotary tiller (HD+ROT)e0
- Outcome
- green beans yieldse2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 5,862.1e2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“heavy-duty disc harrow (HD), rotary tiller (ROT), heavy-duty disc harrow plus rotary tiller (HD+ROT) and no-tillage (NT)”
e1“green bean farming as a second crop after harvesting wheat”
e2“The highest green beans yields were obtained in HD+ROT and NT as 5,862.1 and 5,829.3 Mg/ha, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage gave the highest green bean yield, 5,829.3.
- Taxon
- green beane1
- Treatment
- no-tillage (NT)e0
- Outcome
- green beans yieldse2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 5,829.3e2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“heavy-duty disc harrow (HD), rotary tiller (ROT), heavy-duty disc harrow plus rotary tiller (HD+ROT) and no-tillage (NT)”
e1“green bean farming as a second crop after harvesting wheat”
e2“The highest green beans yields were obtained in HD+ROT and NT as 5,862.1 and 5,829.3 Mg/ha, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Heavy-duty disc harrow gave the lowest green bean yield, 3,076.7 Mg/ha.
- Taxon
- green beane1
- Treatment
- heavy-duty disc harrow (HD)e0
- Outcome
- green bean yielde3
- Direction
- loweste3
- Value
- 3,076.7 Mg/hae3
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“heavy-duty disc harrow (HD), rotary tiller (ROT), heavy-duty disc harrow plus rotary tiller (HD+ROT) and no-tillage (NT)”
e1“green bean farming as a second crop after harvesting wheat”
e3“The lowest green bean yield was found in HD as 3,076.7 Mg/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Heavy-duty disc harrow plus rotary tiller had the highest fuel consumption, 30.60 L ha-1.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“green bean farming as a second crop after harvesting wheat”
e4“The highest fuel consumption was measured 30.60 L ha-1 for HD+ROT”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage had the lowest fuel consumption, 7.50 L ha-1.
- Taxon
- green beane1
- Treatment
- no-tillage (NT)e0
- Outcome
- fuel consumptione4
- Direction
- loweste5
- Value
- 7.50 L ha-1e5
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“heavy-duty disc harrow (HD), rotary tiller (ROT), heavy-duty disc harrow plus rotary tiller (HD+ROT) and no-tillage (NT)”
e1“green bean farming as a second crop after harvesting wheat”
e4“The highest fuel consumption was measured 30.60 L ha-1 for HD+ROT”
e5“the lowest value was found 7.50 L ha-1 for NT”
Claim · model-written summary
No tillage method gave the best results for fuel consumption and effective power requirement.
- Taxon
- green beane1
- Treatment
- No tillage methode6
- Outcome
- fuel consumption and effective power requiremente6
- Direction
- best resultse6
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“green bean farming as a second crop after harvesting wheat”
e6“No tillage method gave the best results for fuel consumption and effective power requirement”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage can be used for second-crop green bean in the Thrace Region, given economic and erosion conditions.
Verbatim
e7“no-tillage method can be used in second crop green bean in the Thrace Region due to economic and erosion conditions”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · pest · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →tillage · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
60 papers more in this group
See all 64 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.