Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage had the lowest fuel consumption, 7.50 L ha-1.
- Taxon
- green beane1
- Treatment
- no-tillage (NT)e0
- Outcome
- fuel consumptione4
- Direction
- loweste5
- Value
- 7.50 L ha-1e5
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Verbatim
e0“heavy-duty disc harrow (HD), rotary tiller (ROT), heavy-duty disc harrow plus rotary tiller (HD+ROT) and no-tillage (NT)”
e1“green bean farming as a second crop after harvesting wheat”
e4“The highest fuel consumption was measured 30.60 L ha-1 for HD+ROT”
e5“the lowest value was found 7.50 L ha-1 for NT”
Title
Different Tillage Possibilities For Second Crop In Green Bean Farming
Yilmaz Bayhan; Güzel, Emin; Özlüoymak, Ömer Barış; et al. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2017. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1131484
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Heavy-duty disc harrow plus rotary tiller gave the highest green bean yield, 5,862.1.
- Intervention effect No-tillage gave the highest green bean yield, 5,829.3.
- Intervention effect Heavy-duty disc harrow gave the lowest green bean yield, 3,076.7 Mg/ha.
- Intervention effect Heavy-duty disc harrow plus rotary tiller had the highest fuel consumption, 30.60 L ha-1.
- Intervention effect No tillage method gave the best results for fuel consumption and effective power requirement.
- Recommendation No-tillage can be used for second-crop green bean in the Thrace Region, given economic and erosion conditions.