Paper · 2017 · Journal of fertilizers & pesticides

Potassium Fertilization and its Level on Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Yield in Shallow Depth Soils of Northern Ethiopia

Brhane H; Mamo T; Teka K

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
18
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Many un-updated reports indicated that potassium was not deficient in Ethiopian soils. However, it was later proved that many Ethiopian soils are potassium deficient. Hence, the Ethiopian Soil Information System (EthioSIS) has initiated potassium fertilizer demonstrations in 2014 using K containing blended fertilizers in different parts of the country. But, there were no evidences about the K in the blended fertilizer is enough for wheat demand or not. Thus, a field experiment was conducted to evaluate the response of wheat to additional K rates on top of the K containing blended fertilizers. The experiments were laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design with 4 levels of potassium (0, 30, 60, 90, of K2O kg/ha) replicated 3 times. Data on yield and yield components of wheat crop were collected and analysis of variance was done. Results depicted that plant height and harvest index were not significant. However, spike length, grain yield and straw yields of wheat were significantly affected by K application rates. Hence, the highest spike length was obtained at a rate of 90 kg/ha K2O but the highest grain and straw yield of wheat were obtained at 30 kg/ha K2O . Besides, the highest apparent K recovery and agronomic use efficiency were found at 30 kg K2O /ha. Therefore, potassium fertilization is important and its level in the blended formula did not meet the wheat requirement in the study area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium rates did not significantly affect wheat plant height.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
potassiume1
Outcome
plant heighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results depicted that plant height and harvest index were not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“4 levels of potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium rates did not significantly affect harvest index.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
potassiume1
Outcome
harvest indexe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results depicted that plant height and harvest index were not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“4 levels of potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium rates significantly affected spike length.

Treatment
K application ratese0
Outcome
spike lengthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike length, grain yield and straw yields of wheat were significantly affected by K application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium rates significantly affected grain yield.

Treatment
K application ratese0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike length, grain yield and straw yields of wheat were significantly affected by K application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium rates significantly affected straw yield.

Treatment
K application ratese0
Outcome
straw yieldse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike length, grain yield and straw yields of wheat were significantly affected by K application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1029 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest spike length occurred at 90 kg/ha K2O.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
90 kg/ha K2Oe0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest spike length was obtained at a rate of 90 kg/ha K2O”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest grain yield occurred at 30 kg/ha K2O.

Treatment
30 kg/ha K2Oe0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest grain and straw yield of wheat were obtained at 30 kg/ha K2O”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1177 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest straw yield occurred at 30 kg/ha K2O.

Treatment
30 kg/ha K2Oe0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest grain and straw yield of wheat were obtained at 30 kg/ha K2O”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1177 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent potassium recovery was highest at 30 kg K2O /ha.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
30 kg K2O /hae0
Outcome
apparent K recoverye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest apparent K recovery and agronomic use efficiency were found at 30 kg K2O /ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic use efficiency was highest at 30 kg K2O /ha.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
30 kg K2O /hae0
Outcome
agronomic use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest apparent K recovery and agronomic use efficiency were found at 30 kg K2O /ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–66 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded potassium in the blended formula did not meet wheat requirements.

Outcome
potassium fertilizatione0
Qualifier
did not meet the wheat requirement in the study areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potassium fertilization is important and its level in the blended formula did not meet the wheat requirement in the study area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1417 · show in text ↑

potassium · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 66 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 227 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Omission of P, K and liming reduced straw yield.

    Winter wheat shoot and root phenotypic plasticity under fertilized and nutrient-deficient field conditions · 2025

    Opposite directionCites this paperAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. positive

253 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.