Paper · 2016 · Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Accumulation of selenium in a Chinese cabbage of a grade Pak-choi in the course of cultivation

K. Yu. Murav’ev; N. V. Barakova; Yu. V. Khomyakov; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Most agricultural areas of Russia have soils poor in mineral selenium, causing higher oncology risks for population of such areas. The way to control malignancy incidence is selenium fortification of soils and plants. This can be achieved by agrochemical enrichment of cultivated plants with nutritive substrates containing essential minerals and trace elements. The current study aimed to assay the effect of inorganic selenium on the rate of Chinese pakchoi cabbage biomass gain for the development of agrochemical techniques for introducing selenium. The optimal selenium introduction technique would demonstrate the best balance of biomass gain rate and selenium ion accumulation in organic matter. Selenium ion accumulation dynamic was assessed during controlled growth of plants in soils enriched with nutritive substrate containing inorganic selenium (potassium selenite). The amount of selenium in plants was determined by spectroscopy. Mathematical functions describing the selenium uptake dynamic of controlled grown plants have been found, including derivatives of these functions that led to obtaining the numerical values of the respective uptake rates. It has been found that agricultural techniques that involve introduction of selenium at intermediate and late stages of cultivation are optimal for plant growth dynamic, as introducing selenium at early stages of cultivation has a negative impact on biomass uptake rates. Additionally, introducing potassium selenite to the nutritive substrate at 1.0 mg×dm–3 proved to be more effective than introducing potassium selenite at 0.5 mg×dm–3 as the former dosage led to a better plant growth dynamic.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Functions described selenium uptake dynamics and yielded numerical uptake rates.

Outcome
selenium uptake dynamice0
Value
numerical valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mathematical functions describing the selenium uptake dynamic of controlled grown plants have been found, including derivatives of these functions that led to obtaining the numerical values of the respective uptake rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early selenium introduction negatively affected biomass uptake rates.

Treatment
introducing selenium at early stages of cultivatione0
Outcome
biomass uptake ratese0
Direction
negative impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“introducing selenium at early stages of cultivation has a negative impact on biomass uptake rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Intermediate and late selenium introduction were judged optimal for growth dynamics.

Outcome
introduction of selenium at intermediate and late stages of cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“agricultural techniques that involve introduction of selenium at intermediate and late stages of cultivation are optimal for plant growth dynamic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1335 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium selenite at 1.0 mg×dm–3 produced better plant growth dynamics than 0.5 mg×dm–3.

Treatment
introducing potassium selenite to the nutritive substrate at 1.0 mg×dm–3e0
Outcome
plant growth dynamice0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
introducing potassium selenite at 0.5 mg×dm–3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“introducing potassium selenite to the nutritive substrate at 1.0 mg×dm–3 proved to be more effective than introducing potassium selenite at 0.5 mg×dm–3 as the former dosage led to a better plant growth dynamic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑

selenium atom · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

potassium · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

growing medium · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.