Paper · 2015

Testing salt tolerance to boost on chickpea (Cicer arietinum l. Mill Sp) biomass/cultivation

Pagadala Vijaya Kumari; Yemsrach Mesfin

3
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Salinity is an ever present threat to crop yield, especially in countries where irrigation is essential in agriculture. Although Saline tolerance conditions of the plants are variable. Many Crop species are generally intolerant to salinity. Excessive irrigation and poor drainage facilities are the major contributing factors of soil salinity in agricultural lands and one third of the world irrigated land is being affected by soil salinity. Attempts to enhance tolerance have involved conventional breeding programmers, use of invitro selection, pooling physiological traits, interspecific hybridization, using halophytes as alternative crops. Use of marker ‐ aided selection and the use of transgenic plants. Preliminary investigations were conducted on the Chickpea cultivar – DESI I.C.C. 9942 which has small dark seeds and rough coat common to Ethiopia. Experimental investigations were performed on the different soils giving different salinity treatments (NaCl in different percentages). Analysis was done on germination efficiency, number of leaves, and length of the plant and wet Biomass of the whole plant. At 6% of (NaCl) treated plants showed the maximum increase in terms of heights and Wet Biomass. There was twofold difference on germination, heights and biomass of the whole plant against the control. One can exploit this research for boosting the chickpea production in the saline soils where it is difficult to cultivate other crops and also for intercropping in saline soils of Ethiopia. Whether enhanced tolerance is due to the chance of alteration of a factor that is limiting in a complex chain or an effect on signaling remains to be elucidated. Even after many years of research on transgenic plants to alter salt tolerance, the value of this approach has yet to be established.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 6% NaCl, chickpea height showed maximum increase and was twofold above control.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume2
Material
DESI I.C.C. 9942e2
Treatment
6% of (NaCl)e0
Outcome
heightse0
Direction
maximum increasee0
Value
twofolde1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 6% of (NaCl) treated plants showed the maximum increase in terms of heights and Wet Biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1214 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was twofold difference on germination, heights and biomass of the whole plant against the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1319 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chickpea cultivar – DESI I.C.C. 9942”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 6% NaCl, chickpea wet biomass showed maximum increase and was twofold above control.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume2
Material
DESI I.C.C. 9942e2
Treatment
6% of (NaCl)e0
Outcome
Wet Biomasse0
Direction
maximum increasee0
Value
twofolde1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 6% of (NaCl) treated plants showed the maximum increase in terms of heights and Wet Biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1214 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was twofold difference on germination, heights and biomass of the whole plant against the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1319 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chickpea cultivar – DESI I.C.C. 9942”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea germination differed twofold from control under salinity treatments.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume2
Material
DESI I.C.C. 9942e2
Treatment
different salinity treatments (NaCl in different percentages)e1
Outcome
germinatione0
Value
twofolde0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was twofold difference on germination, heights and biomass of the whole plant against the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1319 · show in text ↑
e1

“different salinity treatments (NaCl in different percentages)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–994 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chickpea cultivar – DESI I.C.C. 9942”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–797 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

29 papers: 7 positive, 22 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.