Paper · 2017 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROCESSING AND POST HARVEST TECHNOLOGY

Development of night time on-farm ventilated potato storage system inNilgiri Hills of Southern India

ARUN PRASATH VENUGOPAL; AARTHY VISWANATH; S. GANAPATHY

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Post harvest losses of potatoes can be minimized by maintaining proper temperature and relative humidity in storage environment and removing the respiratory heat and carbon dioxide. As the farmers in Nilgiri district do not have access to cheaper cold storages, alternative methods of storage taking advantage of prevailing weather conditions were investigated. The diurnal variation in temperature at the place of study was in the range of -3 to 14C in November and 12 to 28C in February. Ventilation at flow rate of 0.14 m 3 / min was adequate to cool the bulk of 250 kg of potatoes to safer limits. The total weight loss at the end of the storage period on the 120 th day was highest in ambient storage and least in cold storage. The weight losses were 53, 9.8, 3.6, 14.4, 27.7 and 2.6 per cent under ambient storage, ventilated storage, ventilation with evaporative cooled storage, simple ventilation in pits, traditional storage pit and cold storage, respectively. A similar trend was observed on the physiological loss of weight in the above listed trails. Rotting and sprouting levels were highest in ambient storage and were observed to be 40 per cent and 100 per cent, respectively on the 120 th day.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ventilation at 0.14 m 3 / min cooled a 250 kg bulk of potatoes to safer limits.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
Ventilation at flow rate of 0.14 m 3 / mine0
Outcome
cool the bulk of 250 kg of potatoes to safer limitse0
Value
0.14 m 3 / mine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ventilation at flow rate of 0.14 m 3 / min was adequate to cool the bulk of 250 kg of potatoes to safer limits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato weight loss after storage was 53 per cent under ambient storage.

Treatment
ambient storagee0
Outcome
weight lossese0
Value
53e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weight losses were 53, 9.8, 3.6, 14.4, 27.7 and 2.6 per cent under ambient storage, ventilated storage, ventilation with evaporative cooled storage, simple ventilation in pits, traditional storage pit and cold storage, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato weight loss after storage was 9.8 per cent under ventilated storage.

Treatment
ventilated storagee0
Outcome
weight lossese0
Value
9.8e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weight losses were 53, 9.8, 3.6, 14.4, 27.7 and 2.6 per cent under ambient storage, ventilated storage, ventilation with evaporative cooled storage, simple ventilation in pits, traditional storage pit and cold storage, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato weight loss after storage was 3.6 per cent under ventilation with evaporative cooled storage.

Treatment
ventilation with evaporative cooled storagee0
Outcome
weight lossese0
Value
3.6e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weight losses were 53, 9.8, 3.6, 14.4, 27.7 and 2.6 per cent under ambient storage, ventilated storage, ventilation with evaporative cooled storage, simple ventilation in pits, traditional storage pit and cold storage, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato weight loss after storage was 14.4 per cent under simple ventilation in pits.

Treatment
simple ventilation in pitse0
Outcome
weight lossese0
Value
14.4e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weight losses were 53, 9.8, 3.6, 14.4, 27.7 and 2.6 per cent under ambient storage, ventilated storage, ventilation with evaporative cooled storage, simple ventilation in pits, traditional storage pit and cold storage, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato weight loss after storage was 27.7 per cent under traditional storage pit.

Treatment
traditional storage pite0
Outcome
weight lossese0
Value
27.7e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weight losses were 53, 9.8, 3.6, 14.4, 27.7 and 2.6 per cent under ambient storage, ventilated storage, ventilation with evaporative cooled storage, simple ventilation in pits, traditional storage pit and cold storage, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato weight loss after storage was 2.6 per cent under cold storage.

Treatment
cold storagee0
Outcome
weight lossese0
Value
2.6e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weight losses were 53, 9.8, 3.6, 14.4, 27.7 and 2.6 per cent under ambient storage, ventilated storage, ventilation with evaporative cooled storage, simple ventilation in pits, traditional storage pit and cold storage, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato weight loss on day 120 was highest in ambient storage and least in cold storage.

Treatment
ambient storagee0
Outcome
total weight losse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
120 th daye0
Comparator
cold storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total weight loss at the end of the storage period on the 120 th day was highest in ambient storage and least in cold storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiological weight loss followed the same storage-treatment trend.

Outcome
physiological loss of weighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A similar trend was observed on the physiological loss of weight in the above listed trails.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotting was highest under ambient storage on day 120 at 40 per cent.

Treatment
ambient storagee0
Outcome
Rottinge0
Direction
higheste0
Value
40 per cente0
Qualifier
120 th daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rotting and sprouting levels were highest in ambient storage and were observed to be 40 per cent and 100 per cent, respectively on the 120 th day.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1209 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

sprouting was highest under ambient storage on day 120 at 100 per cent.

Treatment
ambient storagee0
Outcome
sproutinge0
Direction
higheste0
Value
100 per cente0
Qualifier
120 th daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rotting and sprouting levels were highest in ambient storage and were observed to be 40 per cent and 100 per cent, respectively on the 120 th day.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1209 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑