Paper · 2017 · Agronomy Journal

Pearl Millet and Cowpea Intercrop Response to Applied Nutrients in West Africa

Nouri Maman; Mohamed Dicko; Gonda Abdou; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Pearl millet and cowpea intercrop production is important in the Sahel. Inadequate nutrient supply constrains crop growth. Pearl millet sole crop nutrient response information is applicable for intercropping. Application of N and P to intercrop compared to sole crop has more profit potential. In the Sahel, crop production is dominated by pearl millet [ Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] cropping systems including intercropping with cowpea [ Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. The research objectives were to determine pearl millet sole crop (PMSC) and intercrop nutrient response functions, profit opportunities from fertilizer use, and a means of relating intercrop to PMSC response. Pearl millet–cowpea trials were conducted in Niger and Mali. The treatment structure was an incomplete factorial with five, four, and four levels of P, N, and K, respectively. Response functions were determined for intercropping with cowpea yield converted to a pearl millet grain yield equivalent for ratios of cowpea to pearl millet grain value (CpPm) ranging from 1 to 5 kg kg −1 . Response functions were also determined in consideration of fodder value. A method of adjusting PMSC response coefficients with CpPm as the independent variable was developed for determination of intercrop response functions. Yields and responses to nutrients were low but adequate for profitable N and P use. Value of intercrop production ranged from 50 to 125% more compared with PMSC for CpPm of 2 and 4, and the respective response to 10 kg ha −1 P was 28 and 135% more with intercrop. Consideration of fodder added 23% to the yield value. Application of N and P for intercrop compared with PMSC production has much more profit potential. The ability to apply PMSC functions in determination of pearl millet–cowpea responses to applied nutrients offers a means to improve fertilizer use for the intercrop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The value of pearl millet-cowpea intercrop production was 50 to 125% more than the pearl millet sole crop at CpPm of 2 and 4.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
intercrope1
Outcome
Value of intercrop productione1
Direction
moree1
Value
50 to 125%e1
Qualifier
CpPm of 2 and 4e1
Comparator
PMSCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl Millet and Cowpea Intercrop Response to Applied Nutrients in West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“Value of intercrop production ranged from 50 to 125% more compared with PMSC for CpPm of 2 and 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Response to 10 kg ha −1 P was 28 and 135% more with intercrop than with the pearl millet sole crop.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
10 kg ha −1 Pe2
Outcome
responsee2
Direction
moree2
Value
28 and 135%e2
Qualifier
CpPm of 2 and 4e1
Comparator
PMSCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl Millet and Cowpea Intercrop Response to Applied Nutrients in West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“Value of intercrop production ranged from 50 to 125% more compared with PMSC for CpPm of 2 and 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1483 · show in text ↑
e2

“the respective response to 10 kg ha −1 P was 28 and 135% more with intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consideration of fodder added 23% to the yield value of the pearl millet-cowpea intercrop.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Consideration of foddere3
Outcome
yield valuee3
Direction
addede3
Value
23%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl Millet and Cowpea Intercrop Response to Applied Nutrients in West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e3

“Consideration of fodder added 23% to the yield value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of N and P for the intercrop has much more profit potential than for the pearl millet sole crop.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Application of N and Pe4
Outcome
profit potentiale4
Direction
moree4
Comparator
PMSCe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl Millet and Cowpea Intercrop Response to Applied Nutrients in West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of N and P for intercrop compared with PMSC production has much more profit potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1621–1718 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearl millet yields and responses to nutrients were low but adequate for profitable N and P use.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
Yields and responses to nutrientse5
Qualifier
low but adequate for profitable N and P usee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl Millet and Cowpea Intercrop Response to Applied Nutrients in West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e5

“Yields and responses to nutrients were low but adequate for profitable N and P use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1385 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A method adjusting pearl millet sole crop response coefficients with CpPm gives intercrop response functions.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
intercrop response functionse6
Comparator
PMSC response coefficientse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl Millet and Cowpea Intercrop Response to Applied Nutrients in West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e6

“A method of adjusting PMSC response coefficients with CpPm as the independent variable was developed for determination of intercrop response functions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1301 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

60 papers: 47 positive, 13 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 65 positive, 1 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

150 papers: 144 positive, 6 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.