Paper · 2017 · Index of Texas Archaeology Open Access Grey Literature from the Lone Star State

Cultivar, Season Extension, Fertilizer Trials of Swiss Chard and Pedagogy of Assessing Cultivars Using Technology

Chanelle Angeny

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract. Diversity of species is a cornerstone of horticulture, and the constant stream of new plant cultivars broadens the palette of options available to the industry. Fifteen Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris var. cicla) cultivars were evaluated during the fall/winter of 2014-2015 season (season 1) and 27 cultivars during the fall/winter of 2015-2016 season (season 2) to determine the best performing cultivars for production and landscape use for east Texas and the southeast by assessing survivability and yield. There was an increase in production of 3.0 ± 0.5 g per plant per harvest under the low tunnel. The cultivar ‘Verde de Taglio’ had the best overall performance during season 1 both in covered and uncovered environments. In season 2, ‘Verde a Costa Blanca’ yielded the most uncovered. ‘Verde de Taglio’ yielded the most covered for this season. It is recommended to use the low tunnels to extend production. A trial was also conducted to determine optimum, pre-plant organic fertilizer amendment for container production of Swiss chard. Ten pre-plant organic fertilizers were compared against a control (Osmocote). There were no significant differences in dry weight, plant height, or plant width among the treatments suggesting all fertilizers were sufficient to produce Swiss chard ‘Prima Rosa’. In the 2016 spring and fall semesters, students in the Crop Science course (AGN 110) at SFASU were given an assignment where they were instructed to use Google Sheets to assess diversity of traits of agronomic crops in a seed catalog. Students were assessed pre-and post-assignment on their experience level with agriculture, gardening, and seed catalogs’, their comfort level with Google Sheets and Microsoft Excel and collecting and analyzing data, and their opinion on the effectiveness of using multiple people to collect data and using Google Sheets. Overall, students were able to use Google Sheets to compile data from multiple people to gain insight on which traits occurred most often in seed catalogs. Combined students, agriculture students, female students, and fall semester students showed a higher level of comfort using Google Sheets and Microsoft Excel. The results also showed that students had a better grasp of what a trait was after finishing the post-survey. Additionally, students created more robust definitions for a trait and a cultivar post-assignment. From the comments provided from the survey, it was evident that students learned more about agriculture and gardening, traits and cultivars, how to interpret seed catalogs, how to use technology, and collaboration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low tunnels increased Swiss chard production by 3.0 ± 0.5 g per plant per harvest.

Treatment
low tunnele0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.0 ± 0.5 g per plant per harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was an increase in production of 3.0 ± 0.5 g per plant per harvest under the low tunnel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Swiss Chard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivar ‘Verde de Taglio’ had the best overall performance during season 1 both in covered and uncovered environments.

Material
‘Verde de Taglio’e0
Outcome
best overall performancee0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar ‘Verde de Taglio’ had the best overall performance during season 1 both in covered and uncovered environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Swiss Chard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In season 2, ‘Verde a Costa Blanca’ yielded the most uncovered.

Material
‘Verde a Costa Blanca’e0
Outcome
yielded the moste0
Direction
moste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In season 2, ‘Verde a Costa Blanca’ yielded the most uncovered.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“Swiss Chard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

‘Verde de Taglio’ yielded the most covered for this season.

Material
‘Verde de Taglio’e0
Outcome
yielded the moste0
Direction
moste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Verde de Taglio’ yielded the most covered for this season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Swiss Chard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend low tunnels to extend production.

Outcome
use the low tunnels to extend productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is recommended to use the low tunnels to extend production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Swiss Chard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer treatments did not differ significantly in dry weight, plant height, or width.

Material
‘Prima Rosa’e0
Treatment
fertilizerse0
Outcome
dry weight, plant height, or plant widthe0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
among the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences in dry weight, plant height, or plant width among the treatments suggesting all fertilizers were sufficient to produce Swiss chard ‘Prima Rosa’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1310 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 97 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 97 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.