Abstract
Abstract. Diversity of species is a cornerstone of horticulture, and the constant stream of new plant cultivars broadens the palette of options available to the industry. Fifteen Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris var. cicla) cultivars were evaluated during the fall/winter of 2014-2015 season (season 1) and 27 cultivars during the fall/winter of 2015-2016 season (season 2) to determine the best performing cultivars for production and landscape use for east Texas and the southeast by assessing survivability and yield. There was an increase in production of 3.0 ± 0.5 g per plant per harvest under the low tunnel. The cultivar ‘Verde de Taglio’ had the best overall performance during season 1 both in covered and uncovered environments. In season 2, ‘Verde a Costa Blanca’ yielded the most uncovered. ‘Verde de Taglio’ yielded the most covered for this season. It is recommended to use the low tunnels to extend production. A trial was also conducted to determine optimum, pre-plant organic fertilizer amendment for container production of Swiss chard. Ten pre-plant organic fertilizers were compared against a control (Osmocote). There were no significant differences in dry weight, plant height, or plant width among the treatments suggesting all fertilizers were sufficient to produce Swiss chard ‘Prima Rosa’. In the 2016 spring and fall semesters, students in the Crop Science course (AGN 110) at SFASU were given an assignment where they were instructed to use Google Sheets to assess diversity of traits of agronomic crops in a seed catalog. Students were assessed pre-and post-assignment on their experience level with agriculture, gardening, and seed catalogs’, their comfort level with Google Sheets and Microsoft Excel and collecting and analyzing data, and their opinion on the effectiveness of using multiple people to collect data and using Google Sheets. Overall, students were able to use Google Sheets to compile data from multiple people to gain insight on which traits occurred most often in seed catalogs. Combined students, agriculture students, female students, and fall semester students showed a higher level of comfort using Google Sheets and Microsoft Excel. The results also showed that students had a better grasp of what a trait was after finishing the post-survey. Additionally, students created more robust definitions for a trait and a cultivar post-assignment. From the comments provided from the survey, it was evident that students learned more about agriculture and gardening, traits and cultivars, how to interpret seed catalogs, how to use technology, and collaboration.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Low tunnels increased Swiss chard production by 3.0 ± 0.5 g per plant per harvest.
- Taxon
- Swiss Chard
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- low tunnele0
- Outcome
- productione0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 3.0 ± 0.5 g per plant per harveste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“There was an increase in production of 3.0 ± 0.5 g per plant per harvest under the low tunnel.”
t0“Swiss Chard”
Claim · model-written summary
The cultivar ‘Verde de Taglio’ had the best overall performance during season 1 both in covered and uncovered environments.
- Taxon
- Swiss Chard
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Material
- ‘Verde de Taglio’e0
- Outcome
- best overall performancee0
- Direction
- beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The cultivar ‘Verde de Taglio’ had the best overall performance during season 1 both in covered and uncovered environments.”
t0“Swiss Chard”
Claim · model-written summary
In season 2, ‘Verde a Costa Blanca’ yielded the most uncovered.
- Taxon
- Swiss Chard
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Material
- ‘Verde a Costa Blanca’e0
- Outcome
- yielded the moste0
- Direction
- moste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In season 2, ‘Verde a Costa Blanca’ yielded the most uncovered.”
t0“Swiss Chard”
Claim · model-written summary
‘Verde de Taglio’ yielded the most covered for this season.
- Taxon
- Swiss Chard
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Material
- ‘Verde de Taglio’e0
- Outcome
- yielded the moste0
- Direction
- moste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“‘Verde de Taglio’ yielded the most covered for this season.”
t0“Swiss Chard”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend low tunnels to extend production.
- Taxon
- Swiss Chard
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Outcome
- use the low tunnels to extend productione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“It is recommended to use the low tunnels to extend production.”
t0“Swiss Chard”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic fertilizer treatments did not differ significantly in dry weight, plant height, or width.
- Taxon
- Swiss chard
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Material
- ‘Prima Rosa’e0
- Treatment
- fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- dry weight, plant height, or plant widthe0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
- Comparator
- among the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“There were no significant differences in dry weight, plant height, or plant width among the treatments suggesting all fertilizers were sufficient to produce Swiss chard ‘Prima Rosa’.”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 97 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
105 papers more in this group
See all 109 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.