Paper · 2010 · Mağallaẗ zirāʿaẗ al-rāfidayn

VIABILITY OF WEED SEED BANK UNDER DIFFERENT EFFECTS OF WEED CONTROL IN LENTIL

A. M. Sultan

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Weed seeds bank experiment was carried out to determine the viable numbers of weed after different weed control methods in lentil in Talkief and Namrood locations in Naniva provancy during winter season 2008-2009. Soil samples had been taken after lentil harvesting. Three factors used in this experiment tillage system (Zero tillage (Z.T.) + Gramaxon (Gr) , Zero tillage (Z.T.) + Glyphosate (Gl) , Zero tillage (Z.T.) , Conventional tillage (C.T.). Different seeding rate (S.R.) of lentil used (100, 120, 140 kg/ha). Also different irrigation systems (rainfall and supplementary irrigation (S.I.) of lentil had been used. Date were subjected in R.C.B.D. as split- split plots with four replications. The result indicated that weed seed population was significantly reduced under rainfall when compared to (S.I.) in Talkief and Namrood location which gave 14.9% , 88.5% for grasses weed seed (G.W.S.) and 13.2% , 64.4% for broad leaves weed seeds (B.W.S.) in two locations respectively. Under (C.T.) system had a significant lower number of (G.W.S.), in two locations while the lower numbers of (B.W.S.) had seen at (Z.T. + Gr.) in this two locations. On other hand , lowest (G.W.S.) was in 120 kg/ha of (S.R.) in two locations while (B.W.S.) was different in that two locations, which lower number had recorded in (140 and 100 kg/ha) in talkief and Namrood, respectively. The highest number of (G.W.S.) were recorded at (Z.T. + Gl.) under (S.I.) with 140 kg/ha (S.R.) in Talkief and under the same condition but with (Z.T.) at Namrood location.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall reduced grass weed seeds relative to supplementary irrigation in Talkief by 14.9%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
rainfalle0
Interactor
grasses weede0weed
Outcome
grasses weed seed (G.W.S.)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
14.9%e0
Comparator
(S.I.)e0
Setting
Talkiefe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed seed population was significantly reduced under rainfall when compared to (S.I.) in Talkief and Namrood location which gave 14.9% , 88.5% for grasses weed seed (G.W.S.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall reduced grass weed seeds relative to supplementary irrigation in Namrood by 88.5%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
rainfalle0
Interactor
grasses weede0weed
Outcome
grasses weed seed (G.W.S.)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
88.5%e0
Comparator
(S.I.)e0
Setting
Namroode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed seed population was significantly reduced under rainfall when compared to (S.I.) in Talkief and Namrood location which gave 14.9% , 88.5% for grasses weed seed (G.W.S.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall reduced broadleaf weed seeds relative to supplementary irrigation in Talkief by 13.2%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
rainfalle0
Interactor
broad leaves weede0weed
Outcome
broad leaves weed seeds (B.W.S.)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
13.2%e0
Comparator
(S.I.)e0
Setting
Talkiefe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed seed population was significantly reduced under rainfall when compared to (S.I.) in Talkief and Namrood location which gave 14.9% , 88.5% for grasses weed seed (G.W.S.) and 13.2% , 64.4% for broad leaves weed seeds (B.W.S.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall reduced broadleaf weed seeds relative to supplementary irrigation in Namrood by 64.4%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
rainfalle0
Interactor
broad leaves weede0weed
Outcome
broad leaves weed seeds (B.W.S.)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
64.4%e0
Comparator
(S.I.)e0
Setting
Namroode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed seed population was significantly reduced under rainfall when compared to (S.I.) in Talkief and Namrood location which gave 14.9% , 88.5% for grasses weed seed (G.W.S.) and 13.2% , 64.4% for broad leaves weed seeds (B.W.S.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage produced fewer grass weed seeds at both sites.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
(C.T.)e0
Outcome
(G.W.S.)e0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under (C.T.) system had a significant lower number of (G.W.S.), in two locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage plus Gramaxon produced fewer broadleaf weed seeds at both sites.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
(Z.T. + Gr.)e0
Outcome
(B.W.S.)e0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lower numbers of (B.W.S.) had seen at (Z.T. + Gr.) in this two locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 120 kg/ha lentil seeding rate had the fewest grass weed seeds at both sites.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
120 kg/ha of (S.R.)e0
Outcome
(G.W.S.)e0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest (G.W.S.) was in 120 kg/ha of (S.R.) in two locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 140 kg/ha seeding rate had the fewest broadleaf weed seeds in Talkief.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
140e0
Outcome
(B.W.S.)e0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
talkiefe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“(B.W.S.) was different in that two locations, which lower number had recorded in (140 and 100 kg/ha) in talkief and Namrood, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 100 kg/ha seeding rate had the fewest broadleaf weed seeds in Namrood.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
100 kg/hae0
Outcome
(B.W.S.)e0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
Namroode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“(B.W.S.) was different in that two locations, which lower number had recorded in (140 and 100 kg/ha) in talkief and Namrood, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage plus Glyphosate under supplementary irrigation and 140 kg/ha seeding had the most grass weed seeds in Talkief.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
(Z.T. + Gl.)e0
Outcome
highest number of (G.W.S.)e0
Qualifier
under (S.I.) with 140 kg/ha (S.R.)e0
Setting
Talkiefe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of (G.W.S.) were recorded at (Z.T. + Gl.) under (S.I.) with 140 kg/ha (S.R.) in Talkief”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage under supplementary irrigation and 140 kg/ha seeding had the most grass weed seeds in Namrood.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
(Z.T.)e0
Outcome
(G.W.S.)e0
Setting
Namroode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of (G.W.S.) were recorded at (Z.T. + Gl.) under (S.I.) with 140 kg/ha (S.R.) in Talkief and under the same condition but with (Z.T.) at Namrood location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1544 · show in text ↑
t0

“LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑

rainfall · weed · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.