Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rainfall reduced grass weed seeds relative to supplementary irrigation in Namrood by 88.5%.

A claim from VIABILITY OF WEED SEED BANK UNDER DIFFERENT EFFECTS OF WEED CONTROL IN LENTIL · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall reduced grass weed seeds relative to supplementary irrigation in Namrood by 88.5%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
rainfalle0
Interactor
grasses weede0weed
Outcome
grasses weed seed (G.W.S.)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
88.5%e0
Comparator
(S.I.)e0
Setting
Namroode0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed seed population was significantly reduced under rainfall when compared to (S.I.) in Talkief and Namrood location which gave 14.9% , 88.5% for grasses weed seed (G.W.S.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–900
t0

“LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77

Title

VIABILITY OF WEED SEED BANK UNDER DIFFERENT EFFECTS OF WEED CONTROL IN LENTIL

A. M. Sultan Mağallaẗ zirāʿaẗ al-rāfidayn 2010. doi:10.33899/magrj.2010.34318

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-b40c0bb9b7f5e1bfcc51bce4b0ff01ffda5a6cd024f42cbacc167b87ee4048bb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

rainfall · weed · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.