Paper · 2017 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Nutrients management strategies to improve yield and quality of sugar beet in semi-arid regions

Irshad Ahmad; Bashir Ahmad; Shahzad Ali; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on the yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes (Beta vulgaris L.). Therefore, a field trial was carried out in Peshawar, Pakistan, during the winters in 2012–2013. The field experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with split plots, having three replications. Fertilizer treatments (control, composted manure Higo Organic Plus at 5 t ha−1, Maxicrop Sea Gold seaweed extract at 5 L ha−1, farm yard manure at 10 t ha−1, inorganic nitrogen–phosphorus (NP) at 90:60 kg ha−1, NP at 120:90 kg ha−1 and NP at 150:120 kg ha−1) were allotted to main plots, while genotypes (Sandrina, Serenada and Kawe Terma) were allotted to the sub-plots. Plots treated with the application of NP at 120:90 kg ha−1 produced the highest beet yield (76.4 t ha−1) and sugar yield (11.1 t ha−1), and had the second highest polarizable sugar content (14.52%) and more economic return (Rs. 553,000 per hectare) as compared to control plots. Sugar beet genotype Serenada had significantly higher beet yield (55.5 t ha−1) and sugar yield (7.9 t ha−1) and a higher economic return (Rs. 380,000 per hectare) than the other genotypes. Sugar beet genotype Serenada supplied with NP at 120:90 kg ha−1is recommended for the general cultivation in the agro-climatic conditions of Peshawar valley.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP at 120:90 kg ha−1 gave the highest beet yield in sugar beet compared with control plots.

Treatment
NP at 120:90 kg ha−1e1
Outcome
beet yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
76.4 t ha−1e1
Comparator
control plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plots treated with the application of NP at 120:90 kg ha−1 produced the highest beet yield (76.4 t ha−1) and sugar yield (11.1 t ha−1), and had the second highest polarizable sugar content (14.52%) and more economic return (Rs. 553,000 per hectare) as compared to control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–1026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP at 120:90 kg ha−1 gave the highest sugar yield in sugar beet compared with control plots.

Treatment
NP at 120:90 kg ha−1e1
Outcome
sugar yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
11.1 t ha−1e1
Comparator
control plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plots treated with the application of NP at 120:90 kg ha−1 produced the highest beet yield (76.4 t ha−1) and sugar yield (11.1 t ha−1), and had the second highest polarizable sugar content (14.52%) and more economic return (Rs. 553,000 per hectare) as compared to control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–1026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP at 120:90 kg ha−1 gave the second highest polarizable sugar content in sugar beet compared with control plots.

Treatment
NP at 120:90 kg ha−1e1
Outcome
polarizable sugar contente1
Direction
second higheste1
Value
14.52%e1
Comparator
control plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plots treated with the application of NP at 120:90 kg ha−1 produced the highest beet yield (76.4 t ha−1) and sugar yield (11.1 t ha−1), and had the second highest polarizable sugar content (14.52%) and more economic return (Rs. 553,000 per hectare) as compared to control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–1026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP at 120:90 kg ha−1 gave more economic return in sugar beet than control plots.

Treatment
NP at 120:90 kg ha−1e1
Outcome
economic returne1
Direction
moree1
Value
Rs. 553,000 per hectaree1
Comparator
control plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plots treated with the application of NP at 120:90 kg ha−1 produced the highest beet yield (76.4 t ha−1) and sugar yield (11.1 t ha−1), and had the second highest polarizable sugar content (14.52%) and more economic return (Rs. 553,000 per hectare) as compared to control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–1026 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet genotype Serenada had significantly higher beet yield than the other genotypes.

Material
Serenadae2
Outcome
beet yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
55.5 t ha−1e2
Comparator
the other genotypese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sugar beet genotype Serenada had significantly higher beet yield (55.5 t ha−1) and sugar yield (7.9 t ha−1) and a higher economic return (Rs. 380,000 per hectare) than the other genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1215 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet genotype Serenada had higher sugar yield than the other genotypes.

Material
Serenadae2
Outcome
sugar yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
7.9 t ha−1e2
Comparator
the other genotypese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sugar beet genotype Serenada had significantly higher beet yield (55.5 t ha−1) and sugar yield (7.9 t ha−1) and a higher economic return (Rs. 380,000 per hectare) than the other genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1215 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet genotype Serenada had higher economic return than the other genotypes.

Material
Serenadae2
Outcome
economic returne2
Direction
highere2
Value
Rs. 380,000 per hectaree2
Comparator
the other genotypese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sugar beet genotype Serenada had significantly higher beet yield (55.5 t ha−1) and sugar yield (7.9 t ha−1) and a higher economic return (Rs. 380,000 per hectare) than the other genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1215 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet genotype Serenada with NP at 120:90 kg ha−1 is recommended for general cultivation in the agro-climatic conditions of Peshawar valley.

Material
Serenadae3
Treatment
NP at 120:90 kg ha−1e3
Outcome
general cultivatione3
Setting
agro-climatic conditions of Peshawar valleye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Sugar beet genotype Serenada supplied with NP at 120:90 kg ha−1is recommended for the general cultivation in the agro-climatic conditions of Peshawar valley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1373 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.