Paper · 2015 · Trends in Biosciences/Trends in biosciences

Standardisation of Callus Culture Techniques for Efficient Micropropagation in Sugarcane

S. S. Gadakh; Dharshita Patel; Y. G. Ban

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sugarcane has a paramount importance among the cash crop in India. Commercially sugarcane is propagated by stem cutting with each cutting or set having two or three buds. After the development of clone or variety, major bottleneck in spreading of clone or variety is slow propagation rate through conventional method, which takes years. Micropropagation is only a realistic means of achieving rapid, large scale production of disease free seed cane of newly developed varieties in order to speeding and commercialization process in sugarcane. Standardization of protocol for induction of callus and shoot regeneration was established through in vitro culture of sugarcane. The best callus induction was observed at 4 mg/l of 2, 4-D. The best response in terms of multiple shoot formation was observed on MS medium supplemented with 0.5 mg/l BAP and 1 mg/l NAA. Best rooting was observed in half-strength MS medium + 2% sucrose supplemented with 0.5 mg/l NAA and 1 mg/l IBA among different auxin. Best hardening response was observed in potting mixture containing Clay + Sand + Bio-compost (1: 1: 1 ratio) in primary and secondary hardening.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane had the best callus induction with 4 mg/l of 2, 4-D.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
4 mg/l of 2, 4-De0
Outcome
callus inductione0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The best callus induction was observed at 4 mg/l of 2, 4-D.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane had the best multiple shoot formation with MS medium supplemented with 0.5 mg/l BAP and 1 mg/l NAA.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
MS medium supplemented with 0.5 mg/l BAP and 1 mg/l NAAe0
Outcome
multiple shoot formatione0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The best response in terms of multiple shoot formation was observed on MS medium supplemented with 0.5 mg/l BAP and 1 mg/l NAA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane had the best rooting with half-strength MS medium + 2% sucrose supplemented with 0.5 mg/l NAA and 1 mg/l IBA.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
half-strength MS medium + 2% sucrose supplemented with 0.5 mg/l NAA and 1 mg/l IBAe0
Outcome
rootinge0
Direction
Beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Best rooting was observed in half-strength MS medium + 2% sucrose supplemented with 0.5 mg/l NAA and 1 mg/l IBA among different auxin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane had the best hardening response with potting mixture containing Clay + Sand + Bio-compost (1: 1: 1 ratio).

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
potting mixture containing Clay + Sand + Bio-compost (1: 1: 1 ratio)e0
Outcome
hardening responsee0
Direction
Beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Best hardening response was observed in potting mixture containing Clay + Sand + Bio-compost (1: 1: 1 ratio) in primary and secondary hardening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–88 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

45 papers: 44 positive, 1 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

sucrose · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

2,4-D · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

27 papers: 27 positive, 0 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

in vitro · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 59 positive, 8 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.