Paper · 2017 · Acta Agronómica

Growth, yield and agronomic efficiency of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cv. IAPAR 117 affected by nitrogen rates and sources

Hector Augusto Sandoval Contreras; Renan Ribeiro Barzan; Mario Sandoval Contreras; et al.

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The aim of this research was to evaluate two traditional N sources (urea and ammonium sulfate) and an alternative one (sulfamoo) with increasing rates (0, 40, 80, 120 and 160 kg N ha-1, respectively) affecting aspects of upland rice crop cv. IAPAR 117. The experiment was carried out in greenhouse conditions, using a completely randomized design in 3x4 factorial scheme, with four replicates. It was evaluated the number of tillers (NT), plant mean height (PMH), dry matter of shoots (DMS), crop yield/mass of filled grains (MFG), content of N-DMS, agronomic efficiency of nitrogen (AE), mass of 100 filled grains (M100FG) and grain harvest index (GHI). The nitrogen rates application as ammonium sulfate resulted in a greater increasing of NT, DMS, MFG and N-DMS, respectively. In fact, higher agronomic efficiency obtained with urea and sulfamoo at 40 kg N. ha-1, although AE decreased within the higher rates of N, independently from the source. The M100FG and GHI were higher when sulfamoo and urea were used, although the high N supply negatively affected these two variables for all N evaluated sources.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate gave a greater increase in tiller number, shoot dry matter and mass of filled grains.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Material
cv. IAPAR 117e0
Treatment
ammonium sulfatee2
Outcome
NT, DMS, MFGe2
Direction
greater increasinge2
Setting
greenhouse conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“affecting aspects of upland rice crop cv. IAPAR 117”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“The experiment was carried out in greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“The nitrogen rates application as ammonium sulfate resulted in a greater increasing of NT, DMS, MFG and N-DMS, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate gave a greater increase in N content of shoot dry matter (N-DMS).

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Material
cv. IAPAR 117e0
Treatment
ammonium sulfatee2
Outcome
N-DMSe2
Direction
greater increasinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“affecting aspects of upland rice crop cv. IAPAR 117”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–252 · show in text ↑
e2

“The nitrogen rates application as ammonium sulfate resulted in a greater increasing of NT, DMS, MFG and N-DMS, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–779 · show in text ↑

ammonium sulfate · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 26 positive, 9 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.