Abstract
The present study investigates the growth and developmental changes of Pearlmillet [(Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.)] and Ragi [Eleusine coracana (Gaertn )] under pot culture experiments with different concentrations of aqueous leaf extracts (5, 10, 20, 30 and 50g/l) of Teak. Teak leaf extracts showed an inhibitory and stimulatory effects on germination, seedling length, biomass, pigments and biochemical constituents of pearl millet and ragi. The 5g/l concentration of extract stimulated the seed germination, seedling growth and biochemical constituents of pearl millet and ragi.. The higher concentrations (10, 20, 30and 50g/l) showed an inhibitory effects in all the parameters studied in the two economically important cereals. The degree of retardation was dependent on the concentration of the Teak leaf extracts. Root length, Shoot length, Biomass and Biochemical constituents of ragi seedlings were highly reduced at 50g/l concentrations of aqueous leaf extracts of Teak. Between pearl millet and ragi seedlings, more allelopathic influence was observed in ragi than pearl millet seedlings.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
At 5g/l, Teak extract stimulated pearl millet germination, seedling growth and biochemical constituents.
- Taxon
- pearl millet
Cenchrus americanuse0 - Treatment
- 5g/l concentration of extracte0
- Interactor
- Teake1other
- Outcome
- seed germination, seedling growth and biochemical constituentse0
- Direction
- stimulatede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The 5g/l concentration of extract stimulated the seed germination, seedling growth and biochemical constituents of pearl millet and ragi”
e1“leaf extracts (5, 10, 20, 30 and 50g/l) of Teak”
Claim · model-written summary
At 5g/l, Teak extract stimulated ragi germination, seedling growth and biochemical constituents.
- Taxon
- ragi
Eleusine coracanae0 - Treatment
- 5g/l concentration of extracte0
- Interactor
- Teake1other
- Outcome
- seed germination, seedling growth and biochemical constituentse0
- Direction
- stimulatede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The 5g/l concentration of extract stimulated the seed germination, seedling growth and biochemical constituents of pearl millet and ragi”
e1“leaf extracts (5, 10, 20, 30 and 50g/l) of Teak”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher Teak extract concentrations inhibited measured pearl millet parameters.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- higher concentrations (10, 20, 30and 50g/l)e0
- Outcome
- all the parameters studiede0
- Direction
- inhibitorye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The higher concentrations (10, 20, 30and 50g/l) showed an inhibitory effects in all the parameters studied in the two economically important cereals”
e1“pearl millet and ragi.. The higher concentrations”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher Teak extract concentrations inhibited measured ragi parameters.
- Taxon
- ragiEleusine coracanae1
- Treatment
- higher concentrations (10, 20, 30and 50g/l)e0
- Outcome
- all the parameters studiede0
- Direction
- inhibitorye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The higher concentrations (10, 20, 30and 50g/l) showed an inhibitory effects in all the parameters studied in the two economically important cereals”
e1“pearl millet and ragi.. The higher concentrations”
Claim · model-written summary
Teak extract retardation depended on concentration.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- concentration of the Teak leaf extractse0
- Outcome
- degree of retardatione0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The degree of retardation was dependent on the concentration of the Teak leaf extracts”
e1“pearl millet and ragi.. The higher concentrations”
Claim · model-written summary
At 50g/l, Teak extract greatly reduced ragi root and shoot length, biomass and biochemical constituents.
- Taxon
- ragiEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- 50g/l concentrations of aqueous leaf extracts of Teake0
- Interactor
- Teake0other
- Outcome
- Root length, Shoot length, Biomass and Biochemical constituentse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Root length, Shoot length, Biomass and Biochemical constituents of ragi seedlings were highly reduced at 50g/l concentrations of aqueous leaf extracts of Teak”
Claim · model-written summary
Ragi seedlings were more affected by allelopathy than pearl millet seedlings.
- Taxon
- ragiEleusine coracanae0
- Outcome
- allelopathic influencee0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- pearl millet seedlingse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Between pearl millet and ragi seedlings, more allelopathic influence was observed in ragi than pearl millet seedlings”
The same questions in other papers
botanical · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →botanical · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.