Abstract
The combined pathogenic effects of Meloidogyne incognita and Ralstonia solanacearum on tomato were greater than independent effects of either. Inoculation of M. incognita, 10 days prior to the inoculation of R. solanacearum led to maximum wilt incidence (100%) followed by combined inoculation of both the pathogens (66.66%). Low wilt incidence was noticed in plants inoculated with bacterium alone and which was on par with inoculation of bacterium10 days before inoculation of nematode.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Combined Meloidogyne incognita and Ralstonia solanacearum inoculation had pathogenic effects on tomato greater than the independent effects of either.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- Meloidogyne incognita and Ralstonia solanacearume0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Second interactor
- Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearume0pathogen - Outcome
- combined pathogenic effectse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- independent effects of eithere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The combined pathogenic effects of Meloidogyne incognita and Ralstonia solanacearum on tomato were greater than independent effects of either”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculating M. incognita 10 days before R. solanacearum gave the maximum wilt incidence, 100%, in tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- Inoculation of M. incognita, 10 days prior to the inoculation of R. solanacearume1
- Interactor
- R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
- Second interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
- Outcome
- wilt incidencee1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 100%e1
- Comparator
- combined inoculation of both the pathogense1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The combined pathogenic effects of Meloidogyne incognita and Ralstonia solanacearum on tomato were greater than independent effects of either”
e1“Inoculation of M. incognita, 10 days prior to the inoculation of R. solanacearum led to maximum wilt incidence (100%) followed by combined inoculation of both the pathogens (66.66%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Wilt incidence was low in tomato plants inoculated with R. solanacearum alone, on par with R. solanacearum inoculated 10 days after M. incognita.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- bacterium alonee2
- Interactor
- R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
- Outcome
- wilt incidencee2
- Direction
- Lowe2
- Qualifier
- on par with inoculation of bacterium10 days before inoculation of nematodee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The combined pathogenic effects of Meloidogyne incognita and Ralstonia solanacearum on tomato were greater than independent effects of either”
e1“Inoculation of M. incognita, 10 days prior to the inoculation of R. solanacearum led to maximum wilt incidence (100%) followed by combined inoculation of both the pathogens (66.66%)”
e2“Low wilt incidence was noticed in plants inoculated with bacterium alone and which was on par with inoculation of bacterium10 days before inoculation of nematode”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined inoculation of both pathogens gave wilt incidence of 66.66% in tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- combined inoculation of both the pathogense1
- Interactor
- R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
- Second interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
- Outcome
- wilt incidencee1
- Value
- 66.66%e1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The combined pathogenic effects of Meloidogyne incognita and Ralstonia solanacearum on tomato were greater than independent effects of either”
e1“Inoculation of M. incognita, 10 days prior to the inoculation of R. solanacearum led to maximum wilt incidence (100%) followed by combined inoculation of both the pathogens (66.66%)”
The same questions in other papers
Ralstonia solanacearum · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Meloidogyne incognita · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →inoculation · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →inoculation · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
129 papers in the same direction as this paper · 136 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
262 papers more in this group
See all 266 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.