Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Intercropping of Roselle with Red Gram and Nipped Castor is Beneficial to Dry Land Farmer

T.N. Pushpa; K. Umesha; M. Vasundhara; et al.

15
claims
15
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

This study was conducted on intercropping of medicinal crops viz., ashwagandha, garden rue, roselle and holy basil with pigeon pea and nipped castor in alfisols of eastern dry zone of Karnataka in kharif 2011. The growth and yield of pigeon pea and castor were high in sole crop than all intercropping systems. The growth and yield of ashwagandha, roselle and holy basils were reduced under intercropping systems. The highest fresh calyces yield of roselle was recorded in sole crop (6.75 t ha-1) followed by pigeon pea + roselle (4.06 t ha-1) and lowest in castor + roselle (3.39 t ha-1). The yield of holy basil in pigeon pea + holy basil intercropping (1.75 t ha-1) was at par with castor + holy basil (0.81 tha-1) intercropping system. The pigeon pea + roselle intercropping system recorded significantly highest LER, ATER and net returns (1.41, 1.35 and `76012.00 ha-1, respectively) followed by castor + roselle (1.29, 1.29 and `62944.00 ha-1, respectively).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeon pea growth and yield were higher in sole crop than in intercrops.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
sole crope0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
all intercropping systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and yield of pigeon pea and castor were high in sole crop than all intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor growth and yield were higher in sole crop than in intercrops.

Treatment
sole crope0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
all intercropping systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and yield of pigeon pea and castor were high in sole crop than all intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ashwagandha growth and yield declined under intercropping.

Taxon
ashwagandhaWithania somniferae0
Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Withania somnifera
Withania somnifera · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and yield of ashwagandha, roselle and holy basils were reduced under intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roselle growth and yield declined under intercropping.

Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and yield of ashwagandha, roselle and holy basils were reduced under intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Holy basil growth and yield declined under intercropping.

Taxon
holy basilsOcimum tenuiflorume0
Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum tenuiflorum
Ocimum tenuiflorum · TaxonI Gd Nj Prt · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and yield of ashwagandha, roselle and holy basils were reduced under intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–413 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole roselle yielded 6.75 t ha-1 fresh calyces, the highest.

Treatment
sole crope0
Outcome
fresh calyces yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.75 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest fresh calyces yield of roselle was recorded in sole crop (6.75 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–496 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeon pea plus roselle yielded 4.06 t ha-1 fresh calyces.

Treatment
pigeon pea + rosellee0
Outcome
rosellee0
Value
4.06 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pigeon pea + roselle (4.06 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–543 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor plus roselle gave the lowest roselle fresh calyx yield, 3.39 t ha-1.

Treatment
castor + rosellee0
Outcome
rosellee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3.39 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest in castor + roselle (3.39 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Holy basil yield in pigeon pea intercrop was 1.75 t ha-1, statistically at par with castor intercrop.

Taxon
holy basilOcimum tenuiflorume0
Treatment
pigeon pea + holy basil intercroppinge0
Outcome
yield of holy basile0
Direction
at pare0
Value
1.75 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
0.81 tha-1e0
Comparator
castor + holy basile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum tenuiflorum
Ocimum tenuiflorum · TaxonI Gd Nj Prt · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of holy basil in pigeon pea + holy basil intercropping (1.75 t ha-1) was at par with castor + holy basil (0.81 tha-1) intercropping system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–739 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeon pea plus roselle had the highest LER, 1.41.

Treatment
pigeon pea + roselle intercropping systeme0
Outcome
LERe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.41e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pigeon pea + roselle intercropping system recorded significantly highest LER, ATER and net returns (1.41, 1.35 and `76012.00 ha-1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–888 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeon pea plus roselle had the highest ATER, 1.35.

Treatment
pigeon pea + roselle intercropping systeme0
Outcome
ATERe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.35e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pigeon pea + roselle intercropping system recorded significantly highest LER, ATER and net returns (1.41, 1.35 and `76012.00 ha-1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–888 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeon pea plus roselle had the highest net returns, `76012.00 ha-1.

Treatment
pigeon pea + roselle intercropping systeme0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
`76012.00 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pigeon pea + roselle intercropping system recorded significantly highest LER, ATER and net returns (1.41, 1.35 and `76012.00 ha-1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–888 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor plus roselle had LER of 1.29.

Treatment
castor + rosellee0
Outcome
rosellee0
Value
1.29e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“castor + roselle (1.29, 1.29 and `62944.00 ha-1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–963 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor plus roselle had ATER of 1.29.

Treatment
castor + rosellee0
Outcome
rosellee0
Value
1.29e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“castor + roselle (1.29, 1.29 and `62944.00 ha-1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–963 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor plus roselle had net returns of `62944.00 ha-1.

Treatment
castor + rosellee0
Outcome
rosellee0
Value
`62944.00 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“castor + roselle (1.29, 1.29 and `62944.00 ha-1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–963 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

intercropping · yield · Ocimum tenuiflorum (holy basil)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · yield · Hibiscus sabdariffa (roselle)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

intercropping · yield · Ricinus communis (castor bean)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.