Abstract
The experiment was laid out in split plot design with two factors namely, tillage practices and different conservation farming split with three replications. The treatment consisted of three tillage practices viz. T1- Conventional tillage, T2 –Minimum tillage and T3 – Summer plouging and five conservation farming viz. C1-Opening conservation, C2-Intercropping with redgram, C3-Mulching, C4-Herbicide application, C5-Combination of all treatments (C1+C2+C3+C4). Observations of crops are analyzed in Split plot design having three replications. The result revealed that conventional tillage gave Growth parameter like- plant population, plant height, root length, dry matter accumulation and leaf area index, crop growth rate, relative growth rate and net assimilation ratio in different stages mostly remained unaffected due to tillage practices. Number of effective tillers, 50% flowering date, number of finger lets penicale-1 and length of finger was not affected significantly due to tillage during experimentation. Whereas, number of seeds per finger, test weight, grain yield ha-1, stover yield and system productivity were recorded significantly highest in treatment summer plouging but harvest index was recorded significantly highest in minimum tillage. In case of Conservation farming system, finger millet recorded significantly higher growth parameter like – plant population, plant height, dry matter accumulation, LAI, CGR, RGR and NAR mostly affected in all combination of treatment practices, however combination of treatment recorded higher values. Number of finger lets penicale-1, length of finger and number of seeds per finger was significantly highest in all combination of treatment C5 except number of effective tillers was observed significantly higher in herbicide application treatment. Whereas, highest grains yield ha-1, test weight, stover yield and system productivity were recorded significantly highest in all combination of treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Growth traits mostly did not vary with tillage.
- Taxon
- Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)
Eleusine coracanat0 - Treatment
- tillage practicese0
- Outcome
- plant population, plant height, root lengthe0
- Direction
- remained unaffectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
e0“plant population, plant height, root length, dry matter accumulation and leaf area index, crop growth rate, relative growth rate and net assimilation ratio in different stages mostly remained unaffected due to tillage practices”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield components were not significantly affected by tillage.
- Taxon
- Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- tillagee0
- Outcome
- Number of effective tillers, 50% flowering datee0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
e0“Number of effective tillers, 50% flowering date, number of finger lets penicale-1 and length of finger was not affected significantly due to tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Summer plouging gave the highest seed number, test weight and grain yield.
- Taxon
- Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- summer plouginge0
- Outcome
- number of seeds per finger, test weight, grain yield ha-1e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
e0“number of seeds per finger, test weight, grain yield ha-1, stover yield and system productivity were recorded significantly highest in treatment summer plouging”
Claim · model-written summary
Summer plouging gave highest stover yield and system productivity.
- Taxon
- Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- summer plouginge0
- Outcome
- stover yield and system productivitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
e0“stover yield and system productivity were recorded significantly highest in treatment summer plouging”
Claim · model-written summary
Minimum tillage had the highest harvest index.
- Taxon
- Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- minimum tillagee0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
e0“harvest index was recorded significantly highest in minimum tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined conservation practices had higher growth parameters.
- Taxon
- Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- combination of treatmente0
- Outcome
- plant population, plant height, dry matter accumulatione0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
e0“plant population, plant height, dry matter accumulation, LAI, CGR, RGR and NAR mostly affected in all combination of treatment practices, however combination of treatment recorded higher values”
Claim · model-written summary
C5 had the highest finger number, length and seeds per finger.
- Taxon
- Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- all combination of treatment C5e0
- Outcome
- Number of finger lets penicale-1, length of finger and number of seeds per fingere0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
e0“Number of finger lets penicale-1, length of finger and number of seeds per finger was significantly highest in all combination of treatment C5”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide application gave the highest effective tiller number.
- Taxon
- Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- herbicide application treatmente0
- Outcome
- number of effective tillerse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
e0“number of effective tillers was observed significantly higher in herbicide application treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined conservation practices produced highest grain yield, test weight and stover yield.
- Taxon
- Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- all combination of treatmente0
- Outcome
- grains yield ha-1, test weight, stover yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
e0“highest grains yield ha-1, test weight, stover yield and system productivity were recorded significantly highest in all combination of treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined conservation practices produced highest system productivity.
- Taxon
- Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- all combination of treatmente0
- Outcome
- system productivitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”
e0“system productivity were recorded significantly highest in all combination of treatment”
The same questions in other papers
herbicide · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →tillage · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.