Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Insect Pests of Tomato and Their Weather Relations under Open and Cover Cultivation

Nagamandla Ramya Sri Shantanu Jha; Nagulapally Sneha Latha

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Tomato is most popular and widely grown vegetable in the world and suffering from both biotic and abiotic stresses. Aphis gossypii, Bemisia tabaci, Thrips tabaci, Liriomyza trifolii, Spodoptera liura and Helicoverpa armigera are the major important insects and causing severe losses under favorable weather condition. The proposed research study was conducted during 2016-17 at Central Research Farm, BCKV. On Tomato (Moula F1 hybrid) on Comparison of population dynamics of important insect pests and their relationship with weather parameters in open field and cover cultivation. The results revealed that whitefly, aphid and leaf miner were most important insects damaging tomato during November to March in this region under open conditions whereas leaf miner and whitefly in poly house. The peak population of these pests was observed during 8 and 9 SMW under both conditions. Pest population and density fluctuation is very low in poly house when compared to open condition expect the leaf miner whose population was high in poly house. Weather relations revealed that Pests under open condition showed greater association with weather variables than in poly house. Whereas canopy temperature, light intensity showed greater degree of association with pests in compression with air temperature and BSH recorded.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whitefly, aphid and leaf miner were the most important insects damaging tomato under open conditions, November to March.

Interactor
whiteflye1pest
Second interactor
aphide1pest
Outcome
most important insects damaging tomatoe1
Qualifier
leaf minere1
Setting
open conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“whitefly, aphid and leaf miner were most important insects damaging tomato during November to March in this region under open conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–744 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf miner and whitefly were the most important pests of tomato in poly house.

Interactor
leaf minere2pest
Second interactor
whiteflye2pest
Outcome
leaf miner and whiteflye2
Setting
poly housee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“whitefly, aphid and leaf miner were most important insects damaging tomato during November to March in this region under open conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–744 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas leaf miner and whitefly in poly house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–790 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The peak population of the tomato pests was observed during 8 and 9 standard meteorological weeks under both conditions.

Outcome
peak populatione3
Value
8 and 9 SMWe3
Setting
under both conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“whitefly, aphid and leaf miner were most important insects damaging tomato during November to March in this region under open conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–744 · show in text ↑
e3

“The peak population of these pests was observed during 8 and 9 SMW under both conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pest population and density fluctuation was very low in poly house compared with open condition.

Treatment
poly housee4
Outcome
Pest population and density fluctuatione4
Direction
very lowe4
Comparator
open conditione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“whitefly, aphid and leaf miner were most important insects damaging tomato during November to March in this region under open conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–744 · show in text ↑
e4

“Pest population and density fluctuation is very low in poly house when compared to open condition expect the leaf miner whose population was high in poly house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf miner population was high in poly house compared with open condition.

Treatment
poly housee4
Interactor
leaf minere4pest
Outcome
populatione4
Direction
highe4
Comparator
open conditione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“whitefly, aphid and leaf miner were most important insects damaging tomato during November to March in this region under open conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–744 · show in text ↑
e4

“Pest population and density fluctuation is very low in poly house when compared to open condition expect the leaf miner whose population was high in poly house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1041 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pests under open condition showed greater association with weather variables than in poly house.

Outcome
association with weather variablese5
Direction
greatere5
Comparator
poly housee5
Setting
open conditione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“whitefly, aphid and leaf miner were most important insects damaging tomato during November to March in this region under open conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–744 · show in text ↑
e5

“Pests under open condition showed greater association with weather variables than in poly house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1170 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy temperature and light intensity showed a greater degree of association with pests than air temperature and BSH.

Treatment
canopy temperature, light intensitye6
Outcome
association with pestse6
Direction
greater degreee6
Comparator
air temperature and BSHe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“whitefly, aphid and leaf miner were most important insects damaging tomato during November to March in this region under open conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–744 · show in text ↑
e6

“Whereas canopy temperature, light intensity showed greater degree of association with pests in compression with air temperature and BSH recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1316 · show in text ↑

protected cultivation · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.