Paper · 2017 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Enhancing Crop Productivity and Soil Health from Intercropping Coriander with Autumn Sugarcane through Scheduling of Fertilizer and Irrigation

Navnit Kumar; Geeta Kumari; Vipin Kumar

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out during autumn seasons of 2010–13 to find out the suitable fertility level and irrigation schedule for coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) grown under sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid complex) + coriander intercropping system on a recent alluvial soil (Entisol) of Bihar. The maximum cane yield (90.1 t ha-1) was recorded with sole sugarcane as compared to intercropping system. Yield of intercropped sugarcane decreased by 8.9 per cent over sole sugarcane. The results indicated that cane yield was significantly higher under F1 as compared to F3 but statistically similar to rest of the treatments. Application of 100% RDF to both the crops with residue incorporation (F1) recorded significantly higher grain (1.38 t ha-1), haulm (1.95 t ha-1) and biomass yield (3.33 t ha-1) of coriander over rest of the treatments. The 100% RDF to both the crops with residue incorporation (F1) showed higher N, P and K uptake. The post-harvest available N, P and K status and soil nutrient balance improved with the application of 100% RDF to both the crops and residue incorporation (F1). Among irrigation schedule, application of 2 irrigations at 60 and 90 DAS (I3) produced significantly higher yield of sugarcane (88.4 t ha-1) and grain (1.44 t ha-1), haulm (2.06 t ha-1), biomass yield (3.49 t ha-1) of coriander. Nutrient uptake by crop was also higher with higher level of irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole sugarcane had maximum cane yield of 90.1 t ha-1 compared with intercropping.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
sole sugarcanee0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
90.1 t ha-1e0
Comparator
intercropping systeme0

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Coriander with Autumn Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum cane yield (90.1 t ha-1) was recorded with sole sugarcane as compared to intercropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced sugarcane yield by 8.9 per cent against sole sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
intercropped sugarcanee0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
8.9 per cente0
Comparator
sole sugarcanee0

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Coriander with Autumn Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield of intercropped sugarcane decreased by 8.9 per cent over sole sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane yield under F1 exceeded F3 significantly and was similar to other treatments.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
F1e0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
statistically similar to rest of the treatmentse0
Comparator
F3e0

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Coriander with Autumn Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“cane yield was significantly higher under F1 as compared to F3 but statistically similar to rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 raised coriander grain yield to 1.38 t ha-1 against other treatments.

Taxon
corianderCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
100% RDF to both the crops with residue incorporation (F1)e0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.38 t ha-1e0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Coriander with Autumn Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 100% RDF to both the crops with residue incorporation (F1) recorded significantly higher grain (1.38 t ha-1), haulm (1.95 t ha-1) and biomass yield (3.33 t ha-1) of coriander over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 raised coriander haulm yield to 1.95 t ha-1 against other treatments.

Taxon
corianderCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
100% RDF to both the crops with residue incorporation (F1)e0
Outcome
haulme0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.95 t ha-1e0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Coriander with Autumn Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 100% RDF to both the crops with residue incorporation (F1) recorded significantly higher grain (1.38 t ha-1), haulm (1.95 t ha-1) and biomass yield (3.33 t ha-1) of coriander over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 raised coriander biomass yield to 3.33 t ha-1 against other treatments.

Taxon
corianderCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
100% RDF to both the crops with residue incorporation (F1)e0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.33 t ha-1e0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Coriander with Autumn Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 100% RDF to both the crops with residue incorporation (F1) recorded significantly higher grain (1.38 t ha-1), haulm (1.95 t ha-1) and biomass yield (3.33 t ha-1) of coriander over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 gave higher N, P and K uptake.

Taxon
CorianderCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
100% RDF to both the crops with residue incorporation (F1)e0
Outcome
N, P and K uptakee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Coriander with Autumn Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“The 100% RDF to both the crops with residue incorporation (F1) showed higher N, P and K uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 improved postharvest available N, P and K and soil nutrient balance.

Taxon
CorianderCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
application of 100% RDF to both the crops and residue incorporation (F1)e0
Outcome
post-harvest available N, P and K status and soil nutrient balancee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Coriander with Autumn Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“The post-harvest available N, P and K status and soil nutrient balance improved with the application of 100% RDF to both the crops and residue incorporation (F1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at 60 and 90 DAS produced significantly higher sugarcane yield of 88.4 t ha-1.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
2 irrigations at 60 and 90 DAS (I3)e0
Outcome
yield of sugarcanee0
Direction
highere0
Value
88.4 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Coriander with Autumn Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of 2 irrigations at 60 and 90 DAS (I3) produced significantly higher yield of sugarcane (88.4 t ha-1) and grain (1.44 t ha-1), haulm (2.06 t ha-1), biomass yield (3.49 t ha-1) of coriander”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at 60 and 90 DAS raised coriander grain yield to 1.44 t ha-1.

Taxon
corianderCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
2 irrigations at 60 and 90 DAS (I3)e0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.44 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Coriander with Autumn Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of 2 irrigations at 60 and 90 DAS (I3) produced significantly higher yield of sugarcane (88.4 t ha-1) and grain (1.44 t ha-1), haulm (2.06 t ha-1), biomass yield (3.49 t ha-1) of coriander”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at 60 and 90 DAS raised coriander haulm yield to 2.06 t ha-1.

Taxon
corianderCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
2 irrigations at 60 and 90 DAS (I3)e0
Outcome
haulme0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.06 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Coriander with Autumn Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of 2 irrigations at 60 and 90 DAS (I3) produced significantly higher yield of sugarcane (88.4 t ha-1) and grain (1.44 t ha-1), haulm (2.06 t ha-1), biomass yield (3.49 t ha-1) of coriander”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at 60 and 90 DAS raised coriander biomass yield to 3.49 t ha-1.

Taxon
corianderCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
2 irrigations at 60 and 90 DAS (I3)e0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.49 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Coriander with Autumn Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of 2 irrigations at 60 and 90 DAS (I3) produced significantly higher yield of sugarcane (88.4 t ha-1) and grain (1.44 t ha-1), haulm (2.06 t ha-1), biomass yield (3.49 t ha-1) of coriander”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher irrigation increased crop nutrient uptake.

Taxon
CorianderCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
higher level of irrigatione0
Outcome
Nutrient uptake by crope0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Coriander with Autumn Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nutrient uptake by crop was also higher with higher level of irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1418 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

88 papers: 67 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 67 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

irrigation · yield · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · yield · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 62 positive, 5 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

irrigation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 129 positive, 13 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

organic · yield · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.