Paper · 2017 · Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B

Effects of split applications of nitrogen fertilizers on the Cd level and nutritional quality of Chinese cabbage

Shi-kai Fan; Jun Zhu; Wen-hao Tian; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cadmium (Cd) contamination in soil is an increasingly serious problem. Management of plant nutrients has been proposed as a potentially promising strategy for minimizing Cd accumulation in crops grown in contaminated soil. This study investigated the effects of split applications of nitrogen (N) fertilizers on the Cd concentration in Chinese cabbage (Brassica chinensis L.) plants grown in Cd-contaminated soil. Compared with single applications, split applications of ammonium or urea resulted in significantly lower Cd concentrations, and higher biomass production and antioxidant-associated nutritional quality in the edible plant parts. However, when nitrate was used as the N fertilizer, there were no significant differences between the split and single applications for the same parameters. We conclude that a split application could be more beneficial than a single application method when ammonium or urea is used as the N fertilizer for vegetable cultivation in Cd-contaminated soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Split ammonium applications significantly lowered cadmium concentration in edible Chinese cabbage relative to single applications.

Organ / stage
edible plant partse0
Treatment
split applications of ammoniume0
Outcome
Cd concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
single applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with single applications, split applications of ammonium or urea resulted in significantly lower Cd concentrations, and higher biomass production and antioxidant-associated nutritional quality in the edible plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Split urea applications significantly lowered cadmium concentration in edible Chinese cabbage relative to single applications.

Organ / stage
edible plant partse0
Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
Cd concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
single applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with single applications, split applications of ammonium or urea resulted in significantly lower Cd concentrations, and higher biomass production and antioxidant-associated nutritional quality in the edible plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split ammonium applications increased cabbage biomass production and antioxidant-associated nutritional quality relative to single applications.

Organ / stage
edible plant partse0
Treatment
split applications of ammoniume0
Outcome
biomass production and antioxidant-associated nutritional qualitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
single applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with single applications, split applications of ammonium or urea resulted in significantly lower Cd concentrations, and higher biomass production and antioxidant-associated nutritional quality in the edible plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split urea applications increased cabbage biomass production and antioxidant-associated nutritional quality relative to single applications.

Organ / stage
edible plant partse0
Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
biomass production and antioxidant-associated nutritional qualitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
single applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with single applications, split applications of ammonium or urea resulted in significantly lower Cd concentrations, and higher biomass production and antioxidant-associated nutritional quality in the edible plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Split and single nitrate applications did not differ significantly for the measured cadmium, biomass and quality parameters.

Treatment
splite0
Outcome
same parameterse0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Qualifier
nitrate was used as the N fertilizere0
Comparator
single applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when nitrate was used as the N fertilizer, there were no significant differences between the split and single applications for the same parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favor split over single applications when ammonium or urea fertilizes vegetables in cadmium-contaminated soil.

Treatment
ammonium or ureae0
Outcome
a split application could be more beneficial than a single application methode0
Qualifier
Cd-contaminated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a split application could be more beneficial than a single application method when ammonium or urea is used as the N fertilizer for vegetable cultivation in Cd-contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.