Paper · 2017 · Plant Protection Science

Effects of potassium fertilisation on late potato blight and yield - short communication

Jolanta Kowalska; Dariusz Drożdżyński

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Potato yields and infestation by P. infestans are related to the supply of potassium. Potassium was applied as soil fertilisation combined with split foliar applications or only as split foliar treatments at a maximum dose of 150 kg/ha K2O in both strategies, Lord and Ditta cultivars were used. Additionally, water spraying was included as an alternative treatment in order to maintain uniform moisture in the rows of plants. Plants fertilised with foliar spraying only were more infested than plants fertilised with combined methods. The fertiliser increased the protection impact of copper treatments against P. infestans. This may suggest a possible synergistic effect in reducing the symptoms of the disease, however not always statistically significant in both cultivars. Plants sprayed with water but without soil application of fertiliser showed a statistically significantly higher infestation rate, both in Lord and Ditta cultivars, compared to plants with soil application of fertiliser but without watering.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar-only potassium fertilisation produced more infestation than combined application.

Treatment
foliar spraying onlye0
Outcome
infestede0
Direction
more infestede0
Comparator
combined methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants fertilised with foliar spraying only were more infested than plants fertilised with combined methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertiliser increased copper treatment protection against P. infestans, although significance was inconsistent across cultivars.

Interactor
P. infestanse0pathogen
Outcome
protection impact of copper treatments against P. infestanse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertiliser increased the protection impact of copper treatments against P. infestans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water spray without soil fertiliser caused significantly higher infestation than soil fertiliser without watering in Lord.

Material
Lorde0
Treatment
sprayed with water but without soil application of fertilisere0
Outcome
infestation ratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
plants with soil application of fertiliser but without wateringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants sprayed with water but without soil application of fertiliser showed a statistically significantly higher infestation rate, both in Lord and Ditta cultivars, compared to plants with soil application of fertiliser but without watering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water spray without soil fertiliser caused significantly higher infestation than soil fertiliser without watering in Ditta.

Material
Dittae0
Treatment
sprayed with water but without soil application of fertilisere0
Outcome
infestation ratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
plants with soil application of fertiliser but without wateringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants sprayed with water but without soil application of fertiliser showed a statistically significantly higher infestation rate, both in Lord and Ditta cultivars, compared to plants with soil application of fertiliser but without watering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑

fertilization · pest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 16 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

application · pest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.