Paper · 2017 · Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research

Sequential application of bio-pesticide, botanical and chemical insecticide to manage aphid and pod borer attacking yard long bean

MR Amin; AA Tarif; MM Rahman; et al.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Present study evaluated the effect of sequential application of a bio-pesticide (Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki) (Bt), a botanical (neem oil) and a chemical insecticide (cypermethrin 25EC) as well as cypermethrin 25EC alone in the management of aphid (Aphis craccivora) and pod borer (Maruca vitrata) attacking yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis) in the field. In each treatment Bt, neem oil and cypermethrin were applied in alternative sequence as well as cypermethrin alone at 07 days intervals. All the treatments reduced aphid population and flower infestation after 24, 48 and 72h of treatment compared to untreated control. Aphid population reduction by the treatments over control was ranged from 34.4 to 71.9%, and the treatment with cypermethrin alone had the lowest abundance of aphid and flower infestation. The Bt followed by neem oil and cypermethrin significantly reduced the pod infestation by pod borer and increased yield (38.9–41.4%) over control with BCR: 1.85-2.16. Use of cypermethrin alone was most effective and showed the lowest pod infestation and revealed the increased yield over control (47.7%) with BCR 4.70. Considering the hazardous affect of cypermethrin alone, its application followed by bio-pesticide and botanical sequentially would be promising components for integrated pest management strategies against aphid and pod borer attacking yard long bean.Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 42(3): 531-538, September 2017

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments reduced aphid population and flower infestation compared with untreated control after 24, 48 and 72 h.

Treatment
sequential applicatione1
Interactor
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorae1pest
Outcome
aphid population and flower infestatione2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
untreated controle2
Setting
in the fielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · InteractorSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“evaluated the effect of sequential application of a bio-pesticide (Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki) (Bt), a botanical (neem oil) and a chemical insecticide (cypermethrin 25EC) as well as cypermethrin 25EC alone in the management of aphid (Aphis craccivora) and pod borer (Maruca vitrata) attacking yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis) in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–380 · show in text ↑
e2

“All the treatments reduced aphid population and flower infestation after 24, 48 and 72h of treatment compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments reduced aphid population over control by 34.4 to 71.9%.

Treatment
sequential applicatione1
Interactor
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorae1pest
Outcome
Aphid population reductione3
Direction
reductione3
Value
34.4 to 71.9%e3
Comparator
over controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · InteractorSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“evaluated the effect of sequential application of a bio-pesticide (Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki) (Bt), a botanical (neem oil) and a chemical insecticide (cypermethrin 25EC) as well as cypermethrin 25EC alone in the management of aphid (Aphis craccivora) and pod borer (Maruca vitrata) attacking yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis) in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–380 · show in text ↑
e3

“Aphid population reduction by the treatments over control was ranged from 34.4 to 71.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cypermethrin alone had the lowest abundance of aphid and flower infestation among the treatments.

Treatment
cypermethrin alonee4
Interactor
aphide4pest
Outcome
lowest abundance of aphid and flower infestatione4
Direction
loweste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“evaluated the effect of sequential application of a bio-pesticide (Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki) (Bt), a botanical (neem oil) and a chemical insecticide (cypermethrin 25EC) as well as cypermethrin 25EC alone in the management of aphid (Aphis craccivora) and pod borer (Maruca vitrata) attacking yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis) in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–380 · show in text ↑
e4

“the treatment with cypermethrin alone had the lowest abundance of aphid and flower infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt followed by neem oil and cypermethrin significantly reduced pod infestation by pod borer.

Treatment
The Bt followed by neem oil and cypermethrine5
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae1pest
Outcome
pod infestation by pod borere5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“evaluated the effect of sequential application of a bio-pesticide (Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki) (Bt), a botanical (neem oil) and a chemical insecticide (cypermethrin 25EC) as well as cypermethrin 25EC alone in the management of aphid (Aphis craccivora) and pod borer (Maruca vitrata) attacking yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis) in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–380 · show in text ↑
e5

“The Bt followed by neem oil and cypermethrin significantly reduced the pod infestation by pod borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt followed by neem oil and cypermethrin increased yield by 38.9–41.4% over control.

Treatment
Bt followed by neem oil and cypermethrine5
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Value
38.9–41.4%e6
Comparator
over controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“evaluated the effect of sequential application of a bio-pesticide (Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki) (Bt), a botanical (neem oil) and a chemical insecticide (cypermethrin 25EC) as well as cypermethrin 25EC alone in the management of aphid (Aphis craccivora) and pod borer (Maruca vitrata) attacking yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis) in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–380 · show in text ↑
e5

“The Bt followed by neem oil and cypermethrin significantly reduced the pod infestation by pod borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–939 · show in text ↑
e6

“increased yield (38.9–41.4%) over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–985 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt followed by neem oil and cypermethrin gave a BCR of 1.85-2.16.

Treatment
Bt followed by neem oil and cypermethrine5
Outcome
BCRe7
Value
1.85-2.16e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“evaluated the effect of sequential application of a bio-pesticide (Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki) (Bt), a botanical (neem oil) and a chemical insecticide (cypermethrin 25EC) as well as cypermethrin 25EC alone in the management of aphid (Aphis craccivora) and pod borer (Maruca vitrata) attacking yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis) in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–380 · show in text ↑
e5

“The Bt followed by neem oil and cypermethrin significantly reduced the pod infestation by pod borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–939 · show in text ↑
e7

“with BCR: 1.85-2.16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cypermethrin alone showed the lowest pod infestation and was the most effective treatment.

Treatment
cypermethrin alonee2
Outcome
pod infestatione2
Direction
loweste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“evaluated the effect of sequential application of a bio-pesticide (Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki) (Bt), a botanical (neem oil) and a chemical insecticide (cypermethrin 25EC) as well as cypermethrin 25EC alone in the management of aphid (Aphis craccivora) and pod borer (Maruca vitrata) attacking yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis) in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–380 · show in text ↑
e2

“Use of cypermethrin alone was most effective and showed the lowest pod infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cypermethrin alone increased yield over control by 47.7%.

Treatment
cypermethrin alonee2
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
47.7%e3
Comparator
over controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“evaluated the effect of sequential application of a bio-pesticide (Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki) (Bt), a botanical (neem oil) and a chemical insecticide (cypermethrin 25EC) as well as cypermethrin 25EC alone in the management of aphid (Aphis craccivora) and pod borer (Maruca vitrata) attacking yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis) in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–380 · show in text ↑
e2

“Use of cypermethrin alone was most effective and showed the lowest pod infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1089 · show in text ↑
e3

“revealed the increased yield over control (47.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cypermethrin alone gave a BCR of 4.70.

Treatment
cypermethrin alonee2
Outcome
BCRe4
Value
4.70e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“evaluated the effect of sequential application of a bio-pesticide (Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki) (Bt), a botanical (neem oil) and a chemical insecticide (cypermethrin 25EC) as well as cypermethrin 25EC alone in the management of aphid (Aphis craccivora) and pod borer (Maruca vitrata) attacking yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis) in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–380 · show in text ↑
e2

“Use of cypermethrin alone was most effective and showed the lowest pod infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1089 · show in text ↑
e4

“with BCR 4.70”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1157 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential use of cypermethrin with bio-pesticide and botanical insecticides would be a promising component of integrated pest management against aphid and pod borer on yard long bean.

Treatment
its application followed by bio-pesticide and botanical sequentiallye5
Outcome
promising components for integrated pest management strategiese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“its application followed by bio-pesticide and botanical sequentially would be promising components for integrated pest management strategies against aphid and pod borer attacking yard long bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1408 · show in text ↑

cypermethrin · Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cypermethrin · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

cypermethrin · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

transgenic · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 78 positive, 2 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

transgenic · Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.