Paper · 2017 · PLoS ONE

Compatible bacterial mixture, tolerant to desiccation, improves maize plant growth

Dalia Molina-Romero; Antonino Baez; Verónica Quintero-Hernández; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
172
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) increase plant growth and crop productivity. The inoculation of plants with a bacterial mixture (consortium) apparently provides greater benefits to plant growth than inoculation with a single bacterial strain. In the present work, a bacterial consortium was formulated containing four compatible and desiccation-tolerant strains with potential as PGPR. The formulation had one moderately (Pseudomonas putida KT2440) and three highly desiccation-tolerant (Sphingomonas sp. OF178, Azospirillum brasilense Sp7 and Acinetobacter sp. EMM02) strains. The four bacterial strains were able to adhere to seeds and colonize the rhizosphere of plants when applied in both mono-inoculation and multi-inoculation treatments, showing that they can also coexist without antagonistic effects in association with plants. The effects of the bacterial consortium on the growth of blue maize were evaluated. Seeds inoculated with either individual bacterial strains or the bacterial consortium were subjected to two experimental conditions before sowing: normal hydration or desiccation. In general, inoculation with the bacterial consortium increased the shoot and root dry weight, plant height and plant diameter compared to the non-inoculated control or mono-inoculation treatments. The bacterial consortium formulated in this work had greater benefits for blue maize plants even when the inoculated seeds underwent desiccation stress before germination, making this formulation attractive for future field applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All four strains adhered to seeds and colonized the rhizosphere under individual and mixed inoculation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mono-inoculation and multi-inoculation treatmentse0
Outcome
adhere to seeds and colonize the rhizospheree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The four bacterial strains were able to adhere to seeds and colonize the rhizosphere of plants when applied in both mono-inoculation and multi-inoculation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four strains coexisted without antagonism in association with plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
coexist without antagonistic effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they can also coexist without antagonistic effects in association with plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium inoculation increased shoot and root dry weight versus uninoculated or single-strain treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
inoculation with the bacterial consortiume0
Outcome
shoot and root dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-inoculated control or mono-inoculation treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with the bacterial consortium increased the shoot and root dry weight, plant height and plant diameter compared to the non-inoculated control or mono-inoculation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium inoculation increased plant height and diameter versus uninoculated or single-strain treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
inoculation with the bacterial consortiume0
Outcome
plant height and plant diametere0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-inoculated control or mono-inoculation treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with the bacterial consortium increased the shoot and root dry weight, plant height and plant diameter compared to the non-inoculated control or mono-inoculation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The consortium benefited blue maize even after inoculated seeds were desiccated before germination.

Taxon
blue maizee0
Treatment
bacterial consortiume0
Outcome
benefits for blue maize plantse0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
desiccation stress before germinatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterial consortium formulated in this work had greater benefits for blue maize plants even when the inoculated seeds underwent desiccation stress before germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

695 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.